
#67 C · Las Vegas Raiders
1 transaction this offseason
Height
6'4"
Weight
301 lbs
Age
25
College
Clemson
Draft
Undrafted
Experience
1 yr
Grade Will Putnam
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Will Putnam grades out as a shaky C for Las Vegas Raiders (D+ Performance). Against that production, his deal reads as fairly priced on the Contract Value Index (C+) — the team is paying below what the play would command. The public read is negative (D+ Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score. As a pro, expect these grades to move quickly as a real sample builds.
Length
1 year
Total Value
$1.0M
AAV
$1.0M/yr
The Raiders secured solid depth at center with Will Putnam's $1.0M deal, earning a C+ CVI that reflects reasonable value for a backup-caliber player. At just $1M annually, this contract represents the type of low-risk investment teams need to make in the trenches, particularly for a position where depth is crucial but premium talent commands significantly higher salaries. The one-year structure gives Las Vegas maximum flexibility while allowing Putnam to prove he deserves a longer-term commitment, creating a win-win scenario where neither side takes on excessive risk. For a Raiders offensive line that has struggled with consistency in recent years, adding a reliable reserve at this price point addresses a key need without handicapping future roster construction. This is the kind of under-the-radar move that doesn't generate headlines but can pay dividends when injuries inevitably strike — solid value for a necessary role player who won't break the bank.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where Will's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Will Putnam sits firmly in replacement-level territory among NFL centers, a second-year lineman whose D+ performance grade reflects the bare minimum contribution expected from a fringe roster player. The most telling data point is his appearance in 15 games, but with only two starts to his name, his role has been almost entirely limited to depth snaps — the kind of situational exposure that rarely translates into meaningful evaluation material. That lack of starting reps is both his clearest weakness and the defining story of his tenure: without sustained time at the pivot, there is simply no evidence he can hold down a starting job at this level. The Raiders retaining him via an exclusive rights tender is a procedural move, the front office maintaining control over a low-cost body rather than making any statement about his long-term viability. As the media framing makes clear, this is routine roster maintenance — Putnam will enter training camp competing for backup duties, with the real question being whether he can survive the roster bubble as the Raiders also brought in Jordan Meredith to compete at the same position. At 25, there is theoretical developmental runway, but nothing in the available data suggests a breakout is imminent or even probable heading into the 130 days before the regular season opener.
Will Putnam ranks 32nd of 71 graded centers by performance. That slots Will between Trystan Colon (C) just ahead and Sedrick Van Pran-granger (D) just behind.
Graded higher
Trystan ColonFree AgentCBlake BrandelMinnesota VikingsC-Cade MaysDetroit LionsC-Graded lower
Sedrick Van Pran-grangerBuffalo BillsWill Putnam's D+ sentiment grade reflects the NFL media's collective shrug at what most outlets are framing as a routine depth move rather than any meaningful roster upgrade. The Las Vegas Raiders center has generated minimal buzz across five headlines that consistently characterize him as a "low-risk depth signing" and "fringe center with minimal NFL experience" — the kind of language typically reserved for players fighting just to make the final roster. Having started only two games in his career, Putnam is viewed as barely above practice squad level, with most analysts positioning him as developmental roster bubble material who will compete for backup duties at best. The media narrative suggests this is pure roster maintenance, the NFL equivalent of keeping the lights on rather than making any serious investment in the position. Fan reaction appears equally muted, with most Raiders supporters seemingly indifferent to retaining what amounts to an unknown commodity on the offensive line. The overall sentiment paints Putnam as organizational depth rather than a player anyone expects to meaningfully impact games.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Will Putnam is a player on a rookie-scale contract listed at C for the Las Vegas Raiders. FanVerdicts covers every NFL player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Will Putnam, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C+, Performance D+, Sentiment D+.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NFL game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NFL hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NFL player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.