
#17 QB · Chicago Bears
Height
6'3"
Weight
212 lbs
Age
26
College
Shepherd
Draft
Undrafted
Experience
3 yrs
QB Rank
#67 / 106
Grade Tyson Bagent
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Tyson Bagent grades out as a middling QB for Chicago Bears (C- Performance). That places him 67th of 106 graded quarterbacks. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at C+, fairly priced. The public read is mixed (C+ Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | Yards | TD | INT | RTG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 12 | 917 | 3 | 6 | 73.0 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 3 | 47 | 0 | 0 | 113.5 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 4 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 89.6 |
Length
2 years
Total Value
$10.0M
Guaranteed
$2.5M
AAV
$5.0M/yr
The Bears secured solid backup quarterback insurance at a reasonable price, making this a fair deal that earns a C+ CVI despite Bagent's limited NFL resume. Paying $5.0M AAV for a rotational player at the most important position represents smart roster building, especially given how quickly backup quarterbacks can become expensive on the open market. At just 25 years old, Bagent still has developmental upside after his surprising rookie flashes, and Chicago is betting on continued growth rather than paying premium rates for a proven veteran backup. The contract structure provides excellent protection with only $2.5M guaranteed over two years, giving the Bears flexibility to move on without major financial consequences if Bagent doesn't progress as expected. While he hasn't proven himself as more than a rotational contributor yet, this deal positions Chicago well whether Bagent emerges as a capable long-term backup or simply provides competent depth behind Caleb Williams at a manageable cost.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where Tyson's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Tyson Bagent's performance grade lands at C-, capturing how he stacks up at QB this season. He remains a solid-backup-tier quarterback whose modest production across limited opportunities reflects the reality of his third-year standing in the league hierarchy. The 2025 season saw him appear in just three games, which underscores both his backup role and the limited sample size constraining any definitive assessment of his capabilities. As a 26-year-old with three seasons of professional experience, Bagent has yet to generate the sustained on-field excellence needed to break into the upper-tier quarterback conversation, and his placement squarely in the middle tier of backup signal-callers aligns with his grade. The current media narrative, while acknowledging his competitiveness and professional approach, frames him as a tradeable commodity rather than a long-term solution — the Bears are actively exploring options to move him before the regular season, a clear signal that the organization views him as expendable despite his status as one of the more respected backups in the division. His aspirational public comments about securing a starting opportunity suggest internal confidence that may not yet align with on-field production, leaving him in the familiar limbo of a capable backup awaiting either a meaningful opportunity or a fresh start elsewhere.
Tyson Bagent ranks 67th of 106 graded quarterbacks by performance. That slots Tyson between Tanner Mckee (C-) just ahead and Kyle Allen (C-) just behind.
Graded higher
Tanner MckeePhiladelphia EaglesC-Kedon SlovisArizona CardinalsC-Joe Milton IIIDallas CowboysC-Graded lower
Kyle AllenBuffalo BillsFan reaction and beat coverage cluster around a C+ sentiment grade for Tyson Bagent. The narrative has crystallized into a split take: analysts and commenters acknowledge his competitiveness and professional standing as a respected backup, yet the overwhelming media arc now centers on the Bears' apparent willingness to move on, with trade speculation and front office indifference dominating recent coverage. His 2025 season production across three games hasn't generated momentum, and the contrast between his aspirational public comments about starting opportunities and the organization's apparent cold shoulder creates a pointed disconnect—he's positioning himself as undervalued while the team signals he's expendable. Recent headlines underscore this tension, with analysts debating whether his trade value should command more or if he's simply a movable commodity the Bears can shed without consequence, and the Bears' recent offensive roster moves (signing Scott Miller, cycling through running backs) suggest internal confidence lies elsewhere at critical positions. The bottom line: Bagent occupies an uncomfortable limbo—good enough to generate modest trade interest, not compelling enough to retain, and aspirational enough in his public messaging to create a narrative of a player outpacing the organization's faith in him, leaving him exposed as the offseason deepens.
No transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Tyson Bagent is a player in his 3rd NFL season listed at QB for the Chicago Bears. FanVerdicts covers every NFL player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Tyson Bagent, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C+, Performance C-, Sentiment C+.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NFL game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NFL hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NFL player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 2023 | ![]() | 5 | 859 | 3 | 6 | 71.4 |
Updated Jun 17, 2026
Recent seasons are weighted more heavily in the overall performance grade.
C-
2025
(50% weight)
C-
2024
(30% weight)
D+
2023
(20% weight)
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.