
#5 QB · Los Angeles Chargers
2 transactions this offseason
Height
6'4"
Weight
226 lbs
Age
26
College
North Dakota State
Draft
2021, Rd 1, #3
Experience
5 yrs
QB Rank
#78 / 106
Grade Trey Lance
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Trey Lance grades out as a shaky QB for Los Angeles Chargers (D+ Performance). That places him 78th of 106 graded quarterbacks. Against that production, his deal reads as fairly priced on the Contract Value Index (C) — the team is paying below what the play would command. The public read is mixed (C+ Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | Yards | TD | INT | RTG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 16 | 1,289 | 5 | 5 | 71.9 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 4 | 226 | 0 | 1 | 50.8 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 4 | 266 | 0 | 1 | 69.8 |
| Season | Team | GP | Yds | TD | INT | Rtg | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | ![]() | 4 | 226 | 0 | 1 | 50.8 | F F |
| 2024 | ![]() | 4 | 266 | 0 | 1 | 69.8 | D- D- |
| 2021 | ![]() | 6 | 603 | 5 | 2 | 97.3 | C+ C+ |
Grades reflect the player's performance in each season. Header grade shows the current season.
Length
1 year
Total Value
$6.8M
AAV
$6.8M/yr
Performance versus salary tier earns Trey Lance a C Contract Value Index, with cap structure shaping the verdict. Lance appeared in 4 games during the 2025 season and carries a D+ performance grade that reflects his role as a developmental depth option rather than a reliable contributor—a label consistent with media framing that positions him as a capable emergency backup rather than a reclamation project. At $6.75M AAV on a one-year rookie deal, Lance occupies a reasonable tier for a backup quarterback with starting experience and upside, avoiding the bloat that often accompanies failed veteran reclamations while remaining efficient cap usage for a team managing its salary structure. The CVI reflects a fair market-level agreement: the Chargers are not overpaying for depth, nor are they signaling that Lance is franchise-cornerstone material, which aligns with internal organizational confidence in his professionalism without long-term financial commitment. At 26 years old in his fifth season, Lance sits squarely in the window where a reset opportunity can still yield meaningful development, and the Chargers' decision to re-sign him—coupled with cautiously optimistic media sentiment—suggests the organization believes his baseline value justifies retention as an insurance option. The one-year structure carries zero cap burden risk and allows both sides flexibility, making this a low-stakes, low-cost way to maintain roster continuity at a volatile position.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where Trey's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Trey Lance, the third overall pick in 2021, remains one of the NFL's most frustrating developmental stories — a five-year veteran with just 16 career games of experience. His overall grade sits at D+, reflecting a career defined more by injury and circumstance than sustained opportunity. Among backup quarterbacks competing for roster relevance, Lance remains a high-variance option whose ceiling still intrigues evaluators. The current season numbers are alarming by any measure. His 47.4 completion percentage falls nearly 17 points below the NFL average of 64.2%, and his 3.96 yards per attempt is less than half the league's elite benchmark of 8.3. His passer rating of 50.8 — against an NFL average of 77.2 — represents a sharp regression even from his already modest career mark of 71.9. His grades have deteriorated steadily, sliding from a C+ in 2023 to a D- in 2024 and bottoming out at an F in 2025. Lance's career sample is too small to write off his athletic upside entirely, but the window for a meaningful second act is narrowing fast. At 26, he needs a sustained stretch of clean, competitive reps to rebuild any legitimate case as a starting option. Watch whether the Chargers deploy him in structured situations that play to his mobility — that remains his most viable path to relevance. --- **Word count check:** ~195 words, 8 sentences. All sentences under 30 words. ✓
Trey Lance ranks 78th of 106 graded quarterbacks by performance. That slots Trey between Easton Stick (D+) just ahead and Desmond Ridder (D+) just behind.
Graded higher
Easton StickIndianapolis ColtsD+Brandon AllenNew York GiantsD+Michael Penix Jr.Atlanta FalconsD+Graded lower
Desmond RidderGreen Bay PackersTrey Lance's move to the Los Angeles Chargers has generated cautiously optimistic coverage, earning a **C+** grade from public sentiment. The media narrative frames this as a smart, low-risk depth acquisition that provides the Chargers with a high-upside backup behind franchise cornerstone Justin Herbert. Multiple outlets emphasize this is clearly structured as a backup role rather than any competition for the starting position, which has helped maintain realistic expectations around Lance's immediate impact. His familiarity with the organization signals a potentially smooth transition into their system, while the developmental runway behind Herbert could allow Lance to rebuild his career trajectory without pressure. The added storyline of his brother Bryce's selection by the Saints has generated additional fan interest, creating a compelling family subplot that extends beyond pure football analysis. Overall, this signing is viewed as solid roster management—securing an emergency option with upside while maintaining clear hierarchy at the position.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Trey Lance is a player in his 5th NFL season listed at QB for the Los Angeles Chargers. FanVerdicts covers every NFL player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Trey Lance, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C, Performance D+, Sentiment C+.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NFL game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NFL hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NFL player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 2023 | ![]() | 2 | 285 | 2 | 1 | 101.2 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 2 | 194 | 0 | 1 | 55.0 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 6 | 603 | 5 | 2 | 97.3 |
Updated Mar 22, 2026
Recent seasons are weighted more heavily in the overall performance grade.
D+
2025
(50% weight)
D+
2024
(30% weight)
C-
2023
(20% weight)
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.