
#93 DT · New York Giants
1 transaction this offseason
Height
6'2"
Weight
305 lbs
Age
32
College
Southern Miss
Draft
Undrafted
Experience
11 yrs
DT Rank
#77 / 216
Grade Rakeem Nunez-roches
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Rakeem Nunez-roches grades out as a middling DT for New York Giants (C+ Performance). That places him 77th of 216 graded defensive tackles. Against that production, his deal reads as good value on the Contract Value Index (B-) — the team is paying below what the play would command. The public read is negative (D- Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score. With 11+ seasons of track record, these grades rest on a deep sample.
| Year | Team | GP | Sacks | Tkl | TFL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 142 | 9.0 | 233 | 27.5 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 9 | 3.0 | 23 | 3 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 15 | 2.0 | 52 | 3 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 16 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$1.3M
Guaranteed
$300K
AAV
$1.3M/yr
Rakeem Nunez-Roches's value math nets a B- Contract Value Index — placing the deal in a clear band relative to the league median at DT. At $1.3M AAV on a one-year deal, this is a veteran-minimum anchor contract that reflects exactly what the market values an 11-year journeyman with modest production: a low-cost rotation body. His 2025 season stats of 23 tackles and 3 sacks across 9 games underscore the C+ performance grade—functional interior presence without star-level impact—and that modest output paired with the sub-$2M salary creates legitimate value for a team seeking depth without cap risk. At 32 years old in an established veteran role, Nunez-Roches occupies the realistic space of a serviceable rotational piece whose NFL future hinges on organizational need rather than proven playmaking; the media narrative confirms he's fighting for roster relevance rather than commanding meaningful opportunity. The one-year structure eliminates long-term commitment risk entirely, allowing the Giants (or any team that signs him) to iterate on interior defensive line depth without financial penalty. However, the D- sentiment grade and the headlines questioning his roster security underscore the central tension: he's cheap enough to keep, but not impactful enough to excite—a depth signing that checks a box but doesn't move the needle on unit performance.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the B band — a quick read on where Rakeem's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Rakeem Nunez-Roches's performance grade lands at C+, capturing how he stacks up at DT this season. At 32 years old with 11 seasons of NFL experience, he represents a classic established veteran on the tail end of his career arc—functional in a rotational capacity but no longer a cornerstone piece on the interior line. His 2025 season production of 23 tackles and 3 sacks across 9 games reflects a workable depth contributor, with his tackle total marking a solid floor for a reserve run-defender. However, those 3 sacks in limited snaps underscore a core limitation: he's not generating consistent pass-rush impact, which is the primary lever for defensive linemen to justify expanded playing time. The media narrative frames him with brutal honesty—a serviceable veteran whose NFL future is contingent on team need rather than proven dominance, and his mid-offseason departure from the Giants to Tampa Bay signals organizational acknowledgment that he's best suited as a rotation piece rather than a starter. At this career stage, durability and veteran presence matter more than statistical explosion, and Nunez-Roches delivers the former while falling short on the latter, making him a replacement-level option filling depth snaps rather than a building block.
Rakeem Nunez-roches ranks 77th of 216 graded defensive tackles by performance. That slots Rakeem between Bill Norton (C+) just ahead and Tim Settle Jr. (C+) just behind.
Graded higher
Bill NortonLos Angeles RamsC+T'vondre SweatNew York JetsC+Greg GainesTampa Bay BuccaneersC+Graded lower
Tim Settle Jr.Washington CommandersThe media narrative around Rakeem Nunez-Roches paints him as a serviceable veteran addition, but this D- sentiment grade reveals the public's lukewarm reception to what amounts to a predictable depth signing. While outlets frame his return to Tampa Bay as bringing "proven NFL experience" and "scheme familiarity," the harsh reality is that fans and analysts view this as the type of low-ceiling move that signals organizational complacency rather than meaningful roster improvement. The emphasis on his being a "quality rotation player" essentially confirms he's viewed as replacement-level talent—functional enough to fill snaps but unlikely to elevate the unit's performance. Despite the positive spin about "bolstering interior depth," the D- grade suggests most observers see this as Tampa Bay settling for mediocrity rather than pursuing impact talent. This type of reunion signing typically generates more indifference than excitement, and the sentiment data confirms that perception holds true for Nunez-Roches.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Rakeem Nunez-roches is a veteran in his 11th NFL season listed at DT for the New York Giants. FanVerdicts covers every NFL player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Rakeem Nunez-roches, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index B-, Performance C+, Sentiment D-.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NFL game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NFL hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NFL player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 0.5 |
| 26 |
| 2 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 17 | 2.0 | 33 | 7.5 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 16 | 0.0 | 17 | 6 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 16 | 0.0 | 20 | 0 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 16 | 0.0 | 9 | 1 |
| 2018 | ![]() | 3 | 0.0 | 2 | 0 |
| 2017 | ![]() | 16 | 0.5 | 24 | 1 |
| 2016 | ![]() | 11 | 1.0 | 23 | 4 |
| 2015 | ![]() | 7 | 0.0 | 4 | 0 |
Updated Jun 6, 2026
Recent seasons are weighted more heavily in the overall performance grade.
C+
2025
(50% weight)
C
2024
(30% weight)
D-
2023
(20% weight)
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.