
#41 LB · Pittsburgh Steelers
Height
6'4"
Weight
242 lbs
Age
26
College
NC State
Draft
2024, Rd 3, #98
Experience
2 yrs
LB Rank
#115 / 338
Grade Payton Wilson
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Payton Wilson grades out as a middling LB for Pittsburgh Steelers (C+ Performance). That places him 115th of 338 graded linebackers. Against that production, his deal reads as good value on the Contract Value Index (B) — the team is paying below what the play would command. The public read is positive (B- Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | Tkl | Sacks | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 34 | 204 | 2.0 | 2 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 17 | 126 | 2.0 | 1 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 17 | 78 | 0.0 | 1 |
Length
4 years
Total Value
$5.6M
Guaranteed
$890K
AAV
$1.4M/yr
Payton Wilson's contract earns a B Contract Value Index, with the AAV sitting where the comparable-tier deals tend to settle. At just $1.4 million annually on his rookie scale deal, Wilson occupies an almost risk-free position for Pittsburgh — the organization is paying third-round capital for a developmental linebacker whose 2025 season produced 126 tackles, 2 sacks, and an interception across 17 games, a volume that speaks to heavy involvement in the defense's scheme. His C+ performance grade reflects the gap between flash moments (highlighted by forced fumbles and physicality) and the inconsistencies that have prompted media skepticism — the "Payton Wilson Problem" narrative suggests he's not yet a reliable every-down option, particularly in coverage responsibilities. At 26 years old and entering only his second NFL season, Wilson sits at the exact inflection point where the Steelers' internal confidence in his developmental arc can either validate or collapse; the recent roster moves suggest Pittsburgh is building around younger defensive pieces rather than chasing immediate production, which makes his sub-$1.5M cap hit a steal if he breaks through. The four-year rookie deal structure gives Pittsburgh maximum runway to let him develop without cap penalty, and his B- sentiment grade indicates cautious belief that he can evolve from rotational contributor into a foundational linebacker — a leap that hinges entirely on whether he can eliminate the coverage lapses that currently prevent him from being a true starter. This is a textbook case of lottery-ticket value: minimal financial downside, proven athleticism, organizational endorsement, and years of control to prove whether the potential translates to consistency.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the B band — a quick read on where Payton's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Among linebackers on the Pittsburgh Steelers, Payton Wilson's output grades to a C+ performance level. The 26-year-old second-year player logged a full 17-game slate in 2025, accumulating 126 tackles and demonstrating the durability required for an every-down role in Pittsburgh's retooled defensive scheme. His tackle volume represents the clearest statistical strength, translating into the physicality and instinct that recent coverage has highlighted — including a forced fumble that exemplifies his hit-stick capability at the position. However, his secondary production — 2 sacks and 1 interception across 17 appearances — reveals a significant gap in impact plays and coverage reliability that appears to be the core of the emerging "Payton Wilson Problem" narrative. The media framing around Wilson suggests the Steelers organization views him as foundational to their defensive rebuild and positioned for a leadership role, yet the skepticism creeping into analyst discourse indicates he remains at a crossroads where consistency in coverage situations will determine whether he evolves into a reliable starter or settles into a rotational contributor. At this stage of his second year, Wilson carries both the tools and organizational trust to break through, but sustained improvement in scheme mastery and game-to-game reliability will be the decisive factor heading into 2026.
Payton Wilson ranks 115th of 338 graded linebackers by performance. That slots Payton between Tatum Bethune (C+) just ahead and Jamon Johnson (C+) just behind.
Graded higher
Tatum BethuneSan Francisco 49ersC+Trace FordNew York GiantsC+Trevin WallaceCarolina PanthersC+Graded lower
Jamon JohnsonGreen Bay PackersPayton Wilson carries a B- sentiment grade heading into 2026, reflecting the cautious optimism surrounding Pittsburgh's intriguing defensive development project. The second-year linebacker has generated legitimate buzz after reportedly making history in his sophomore campaign, with his natural instincts and physicality translating into highlight-reel moments like recent forced fumbles that showcase his NFL-caliber athletic tools. However, the emergence of critical analysis framing "The Payton Wilson Problem" indicates that evaluators have identified concerning inconsistencies — likely in coverage situations or scheme adaptation — that prevent him from taking the next step as a reliable every-down player. At just $1.4 million annually, Wilson represents the ideal low-risk, high-upside asset that Pittsburgh's front office views as a long-term core piece rather than a temporary solution. The media narrative suggests Wilson sits at a crucial juncture where sustained improvement could vault him into legitimate starting conversations, while continued growing pains risk cementing him as a rotational contributor. Overall, the perception is one of measured enthusiasm — recognizing his undeniable talent while acknowledging the developmental hurdles that still need clearing.
No transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Payton Wilson is a player in his 2nd NFL season listed at LB for the Pittsburgh Steelers. FanVerdicts covers every NFL player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Payton Wilson, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index B, Performance C+, Sentiment B-.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NFL game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NFL hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NFL player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
Recent seasons are weighted more heavily in the overall performance grade.
C
2025
(50% weight)
C
2024
(30% weight)
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.