
QB · Tennessee Titans
1 transaction this offseason
Height
6'3"
Weight
222 lbs
Age
31
College
North Carolina
Draft
2017, Rd 1, #2
Experience
9 yrs
QB Rank
#47 / 106
Grade Mitchell Trubisky
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Mitchell Trubisky grades out as a middling QB for Tennessee Titans (C Performance). That places him 47th of 106 graded quarterbacks. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at C+, fairly priced. The public read is mixed (C Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | Yards | TD | INT | RTG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 82 | 13,028 | 78 | 48 | 86.9 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 4 | 313 | 4 | 0 | 137.0 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 9 | 179 | 2 | 0 | 117.3 |
Length
2 years
Total Value
$10.5M
Guaranteed
$6.8M
AAV
$5.3M/yr
The Titans landed a solid backup quarterback at market rate, making this a fair deal that earns a C+ CVI. Trubisky's $5.3M AAV sits right where you'd expect for a serviceable starter who can step in during injury situations — not a bargain, but not an overpay for a former first-round pick with starting experience. At 30 years old, he's in that sweet spot where he's seasoned enough to handle spot duty but not so old that he's completely washed, and his brief resurgence in Pittsburgh showed he can still manage games competently when needed. The contract structure is quarterback-friendly with $6.8M guaranteed on a two-year deal, but that level of security makes sense given Tennessee's uncertainty behind Will Levis. This signing reflects smart roster building — paying slightly above backup money for a player who gives you legitimate starter upside if your young quarterback struggles, without breaking the bank on a premium veteran.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where Mitchell's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Mitchell Trubisky's tape and counting stats together earn a C performance grade. At 31 years old and nine seasons into his NFL career, he occupies the tier of a below-average starting option or viable backup—a former second-overall pick whose early promise never materialized into sustained excellence, leaving him squarely in the veteran reclamation conversation rather than among the league's functional franchisers. The 2025 season offered only four games of evidence, which is too thin a sample to isolate statistical strengths or pinpoint correctable weaknesses; what emerges instead is a career passer rating of 86.9 that encapsulates his entire arc—competent enough to keep a team alive on any given Sunday, but without the efficiency or big-play production to elevate a roster. His durability has never been in question; the issue is that nine years of NFL snaps have produced a floor of mediocrity rather than a ceiling of upside, and the Titans' recent roster moves—adding defensive line depth, linebacker support, and receiving weapons—read as organizational hedging, suggesting the front office views him as a bridge while hunting for a longer-term solution. The media narrative captures this perfectly: Trubisky is understood as a placeholder rather than an architect, and with Tennessee sitting at 3-14 and already pivoting conversation toward what comes next at the position, there's no indication his role will expand beyond the functional minimum required to keep games competitive.
Mitchell Trubisky ranks 47th of 106 graded quarterbacks by performance. That slots Mitchell between Brett Rypien (C) just ahead and Skylar Thompson (C) just behind.
Graded higher
Brett RypienMinnesota VikingsCJacoby BrissettArizona CardinalsCSam EhlingerDenver BroncosCGraded lower
Skylar ThompsonBaltimore RavensRecent headlines push Mitchell Trubisky's sentiment grade to a C, with Tennessee's broader season shaping the read. The media framing is unambiguous: Trubisky is understood as a "serviceable bridge signing" rather than a franchise solution, a former second-overall pick whose nine-year career arc from high-profile starter to backup has established a clear ceiling that nobody is pretending doesn't exist. His arrival generated modest but broadly positive attention—the kind of relief that comes from plugging a hole, not the enthusiasm that follows a transformative acquisition—and coverage has already pivoted to what this signing means for Will Levis's future, signaling that both the fanbase and media are thinking past Trubisky rather than investing in him. The Titans' recent roster moves—defensive end and linebacker additions, wide receiver signings—read like an organization patching holes around a placeholder quarterback, which reinforces the narrative that this is functional but uninspiring band-aid work rather than a coherent plan under center. The 3-14 record and mounting offseason activity underscore the real story: a team hunting for something better, and a veteran quarterback filling space while that search plays out.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Mitchell Trubisky is a veteran in his 9th NFL season listed at QB for the Tennessee Titans. FanVerdicts covers every NFL player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Mitchell Trubisky, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C+, Performance C, Sentiment C.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NFL game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NFL hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NFL player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 2023 | ![]() | 5 | 632 | 4 | 5 | 71.9 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 7 | 1,252 | 4 | 5 | 81.1 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 6 | 43 | 0 | 1 | 47.4 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 10 | 2,055 | 16 | 8 | 52.1 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 15 | 3,138 | 17 | 10 | 52.1 |
| 2018 | ![]() | 14 | 3,223 | 24 | 12 | 56.3 |
| 2017 | ![]() | 12 | 2,193 | 7 | 7 | 52.1 |
Updated May 29, 2026
Recent seasons are weighted more heavily in the overall performance grade.
C-
2025
(50% weight)
C-
2024
(30% weight)
D+
2023
(20% weight)
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.