
#9 QB · Los Angeles Rams
Height
6'3"
Weight
214 lbs
Age
38
College
Georgia
Draft
2009, Rd 1, #1
Experience
17 yrs
QB Rank
#7 / 106
Grade Matthew Stafford
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Matthew Stafford grades out as an excellent QB for Los Angeles Rams (A- Performance). That places him 7th of 106 graded quarterbacks. The contract is harder to defend: the Contract Value Index calls it fairly priced (C+), with the cost outrunning the output. The public read is very positive (A- Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score. With 17+ seasons of track record, these grades rest on a deep sample.
| Year | Team | GP | Yards | TD | INT | RTG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 239 | 64,516 | 423 | 196 | 92.4 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 17 | 4,707 | 46 | 8 | 109.2 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 16 | 3,762 | 20 | 8 | 93.7 |
Length
2 years
Total Value
$84.0M
Guaranteed
$40.0M
AAV
$42.0M/yr
Matthew Stafford's Contract Value Index lands at C+, putting the deal in a defined slice of comparable signings. At $42M average annual value across two years, the extension represents a premium for an elite-tier quarterback coming off a 2025 MVP season and All-Pro 1st Team honors—performance that would justify top-market compensation. However, the C+ verdict reflects the inherent risk premium baked into a two-year pact for a 38-year-old signal-caller, where durability and decline trajectory carry outsized weight relative to his current on-field excellence. Stafford's A- performance grade and his 2025 MVP credentials anchor the deal's legitimacy, but the Rams are banking on compressed remaining runway; at his career stage as a 17-year veteran, the organization appears to be operating within a defined competitive window rather than a long-term investment. The media narrative—oscillating between celebration of his proven winner status and skepticism about sustained success without a fully loaded roster—suggests the market itself views this as a calculated gamble on peak years remaining. The Rams' aggressive defensive retooling (trading for Myles Garrett, adding linebacker and defensive line depth) signals front-office conviction that Stafford's two-year window justifies roster construction around him, even as broader questions about his sustainability linger on the margins of analyst discussion.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where Matthew's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Matthew Stafford, the 2009 first-overall pick, enters his 17th NFL season as a proven championship-caliber quarterback anchoring Sean McVay's high-powered Rams offense. Earning an A- grade overall, Stafford remains a legitimate starter whose Super Bowl LVI ring underscores a career built on elite arm talent and competitive durability across 239 games. His 92.4 career passer rating and 63.5% completion percentage reflect a body of work that surpasses what any single-season snapshot can fully capture. This season, Stafford is operating well above league average in the areas that matter most, posting a 109.2 passer rating against an NFL average of 87.8 and generating 7.88 yards per attempt compared to the league average of 6.73. His TD percentage of 7.71% nearly touches the elite threshold of 8.28%, and his 276.9 passing yards per game comfortably exceeds the league average of 189.3. The lone statistical footnote is mobility — his 0.06 rushing yards per game against an NFL average of 12.3 — though that has never been his game and McVay's scheme doesn't demand it. Recent seasonal grades tell a complicated story: a C- in 2024 and a C in 2023 raised durability and consistency concerns, making his current B- bounce-back in 2025 an encouraging sign. At 38, Stafford isn't rebuilding — he's recalibrating, and the arm is clearly still there. Watch whether McVay can limit his snap count and protect him through January, where Stafford's ceiling remains legitimate playoff-contender territory.
Matthew Stafford ranks 7th of 106 graded quarterbacks by performance. That slots Matthew between Jared Goff (A-) just ahead and Patrick Mahomes (A-) just behind.
Graded higher
Jared GoffDetroit LionsA-Josh AllenBuffalo BillsA-Jalen HurtsPhiladelphia EaglesA-Graded lower
Patrick MahomesKansas City ChiefsMatthew Stafford's public perception scores an A- sentiment grade as fan and media tone converge. The narrative remains anchored by his 2025 MVP season and All-Pro credentials, along with the Rams' organizational stability under Sean McVay—both of which reinforce his standing as a franchise cornerstone and elite quarterback. However, the media ecosystem has grown decidedly mixed in recent weeks, with coverage pivoting from pure celebration toward questions about his capacity to win without a fully loaded roster, alongside some friction from off-field tabloid involvement that's introduced minor erosion into an otherwise stellar reputation. His A- performance grade aligns cleanly with this perception: he's viewed as a proven winner delivering at the highest level on the field, even as broader media scrutiny nibbles at the edges of goodwill. The Rams' aggressive offseason moves—trading for Myles Garrett and retooling the defense—signal that the organization remains committed to building around Stafford as a centerpiece, a vote of confidence reflected in his one-year, $55M extension. All told, Stafford sits in a position of strength heading into 2026: his elite pedigree insulates him from serious reputational damage, and he's being treated as a player navigating normal seasonal noise rather than one in decline.
No transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Matthew Stafford is a veteran in his 17th NFL season listed at QB for the Los Angeles Rams. FanVerdicts covers every NFL player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Matthew Stafford, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C+, Performance A-, Sentiment A-.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NFL game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NFL hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NFL player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 2023 | ![]() | 15 | 3,965 | 24 | 11 | 92.5 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 9 | 2,087 | 10 | 8 | 87.4 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 17 | 4,886 | 41 | 17 | 102.9 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 16 | 4,084 | 26 | 10 | 56.3 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 8 | 2,499 | 19 | 5 | 60.4 |
| 2018 | ![]() | 16 | 3,777 | 21 | 11 | 52.1 |
| 2017 | ![]() | 16 | 4,446 | 29 | 10 | 56.3 |
| 2016 | ![]() | 16 | 4,327 | 24 | 10 | 56.3 |
| 2015 | ![]() | 16 | 4,262 | 32 | 13 | 56.3 |
| 2014 | ![]() | 16 | 4,257 | 22 | 12 | 56.3 |
| 2013 | ![]() | 16 | 4,650 | 29 | 19 | 56.3 |
| 2012 | ![]() | 16 | 4,967 | 20 | 17 | 79.8 |
| 2011 | ![]() | 16 | 5,038 | 41 | 16 | 97.2 |
| 2010 | ![]() | 3 | 535 | 6 | 1 | 91.3 |
| 2009 | ![]() | 10 | 2,267 | 13 | 20 | 61.0 |
Updated May 25, 2026
Recent seasons are weighted more heavily in the overall performance grade.
B-
2025
(50% weight)
C-
2024
(30% weight)
C
2023
(20% weight)
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.