
#15 PK · Buffalo Bills
Height
5'10"
Weight
175 lbs
Age
41
College
UCF
Draft
Undrafted
Experience
19 yrs
PK Rank
#6 / 39
Grade Matt Prater
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Matt Prater grades out as a strong PK for Buffalo Bills (B- Performance). That places him 6th of 39 graded pks. Against that production, his deal reads as a clear bargain on the Contract Value Index (A-) — the team is paying below what the play would command. The public read is positive (B- Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score. With 19+ seasons of track record, these grades rest on a deep sample.
| Year | Team | GP | FG% |
|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 91 | 83.8% |
| 2025 | ![]() | 15 | 90.0% |
| 2024 | ![]() | 4 | 100.0% |
| 2023 | ![]() | 17 | 84.8% |
| 2022 | ![]() | 13 | 88.0% |
| 2021 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$1.3M
AAV
$1.3M/yr
Among PK contracts at this AAV tier, Matt Prater earns a A- Contract Value Index (CVI). At $1.255M per year on a one-year deal, Prater's contract represents efficient roster management for a franchise needing proven reliability at a premium position—his B- performance grade on the 2025 season (15 games played) reflects a kicker still capable of clutch production without commanding the kind of guaranteed money that would handcuff the Bills' flexibility. The kicker market at this salary level typically demands either younger prospects with upside or veteran anchors locked in for multiple seasons; Prater's single-year structure is the rare middle ground that lets Buffalo test durability at 41 while preserving the option to pivot without dead-cap consequences. His 19-year career pedigree and recent playoff heroics—the 50-yard game-winning field goal to force overtime—justify the CVI grade despite the Week 16 injury absence and the open competition with Tyler Bass that signals organizational hedging rather than full commitment. The Bills' recent roster moves, including receiver additions and cornerback reshuffles, show a team in active roster-maintenance mode, which means every dollar counts; Prater's contract hits that efficiency target while the one-year term ensures he won't become a legacy overpay if durability concerns prove prescient. Unless the Bass competition resolves decisively in Prater's favor, his public standing will likely remain in the cautious-respect tier, and the CVI grade appropriately reflects a contract that costs next to nothing while demanding nothing long-term in return.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the A band — a quick read on where Matt's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Matt Prater remains one of the NFL's most durable specialists, a 19-year veteran whose longevity alone separates him from most kickers in league history. Now with the Buffalo Bills, Prater earns a B- overall grade — solid, if not spectacular — but his career body of work demands respect that a single-season snapshot cannot fully capture. At 41, he occupies the role of reliable veteran stabilizer rather than elite difference-maker, comparable to where Adam Vinatieri and John Carney landed in their later years. His current 90.0% field goal accuracy sits meaningfully above the NFL average of 85.0%, though it still trails the elite threshold of 93.0% — a gap worth monitoring. That accuracy mark reflects a genuine strength, suggesting Prater remains a functional starter rather than a declining liability. The concern is sustainability; deep-range attempts and cold-weather performance in Buffalo will be the real tests of whether that number holds. His season trajectory tells an interesting story — after a rough C- in 2023, Prater responded with a B+ in 2024 before settling at a B in 2025, suggesting a stabilized but modest rebound. That recovery arc is encouraging and mirrors how veteran kickers like Phil Dawson extended careers through mechanical refinement rather than raw leg strength. At this stage, consistency over splash is the standard, and Prater largely meets it. If his accuracy holds above 88% through the back half of the season, he projects as a dependable low-risk option in Buffalo's playoff push — but a dip below league average would quickly accelerate roster questions heading into the offseason.
Matt Prater ranks 6th of 39 graded pks by performance. That slots Matt between Ka'imi Fairbairn (B-) just ahead and Chris Boswell (B-) just behind.
Graded higher
Ka'imi FairbairnHouston TexansB-Eddy PineiroSan Francisco 49ersB-Cam LittleJacksonville JaguarsB-Graded lower
Chris BoswellPittsburgh SteelersMatt Prater's public standing with the Buffalo Bills sits at a warm but genuinely uncertain B- heading into the 2026 offseason, a grade that captures the tension between affection and anxiety surrounding a 41-year-old kicker with 19 seasons of professional equity. The dominant narrative is shaped by two competing forces: his game-winning 50-yard field goal that sent a playoff contest to overtime — the kind of clutch, high-leverage moment that cements legendary status in a fanbase — and a Week 16 injury absence that reignited every durability concern that comes with evaluating a veteran at this stage of his career. On-field, his performance grade mirrors his sentiment grade, a B-, suggesting the production is real but bounded, not the work of a declining player coasting on reputation but also not someone who has silenced the doubters entirely. The Tyler Bass competition storyline is the most consequential cloud hanging over Prater's perception right now; open kicker battles at this point in a veteran's career rarely generate the kind of celebratory coverage that builds confidence, and analysts are framing this as a genuine decision rather than a formality. The Bills have been active in reshaping their roster this offseason — signing Damar Hamlin to an extension and adding pieces across multiple positions — signaling a franchise in aggressive roster-maintenance mode, which only intensifies the scrutiny around every roster spot, including kicker. Fan sentiment remains meaningfully warmer than the professional media temperature, with Prater's character and clutch moments buying him genuine goodwill that a pure production analysis might not fully explain. The narrative is steady rather than deteriorating, but unless the kicker competition resolves cleanly in his favor this offseason, the B- ceiling on his public perception is unlikely to move.
No transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Matt Prater is a veteran in his 19th NFL season listed at PK for the Buffalo Bills. FanVerdicts covers every NFL player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Matt Prater, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index A-, Performance B-, Sentiment B-.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NFL game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NFL hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NFL player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
![]() |
| 17 |
| 81.1% |
| 2020 | ![]() | 16 | 75.0% |
| 2019 | ![]() | 16 | 83.9% |
| 2018 | ![]() | 16 | 87.5% |
| 2017 | ![]() | 16 | 85.7% |
| 2016 | ![]() | 16 | 86.1% |
| 2015 | ![]() | 16 | 91.7% |
| 2014 | ![]() | 11 | 80.8% |
| 2013 | ![]() | 16 | 96.2% |
| 2012 | ![]() | 16 | 81.3% |
| 2011 | ![]() | 16 | 76.0% |
| 2010 | ![]() | 12 | 88.9% |
| 2009 | ![]() | 16 | 85.7% |
| 2008 | ![]() | 16 | 73.5% |
| 2007 | ![]() | 2 | 25.0% |
Updated May 25, 2026
Recent seasons are weighted more heavily in the overall performance grade.
C+
2025
(50% weight)
B-
2024
(30% weight)
C-
2023
(20% weight)
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.