
#65 C · Cincinnati Bengals
1 transaction this offseason
Height
6'4"
Weight
310 lbs
Age
25
College
Miami
Draft
2024, Rd 7, #237
Experience
2 yrs
Grade Matt Lee
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Matt Lee grades out as a shaky C for Cincinnati Bengals (D- Performance). Against that production, his deal reads as fairly priced on the Contract Value Index (C+) — the team is paying below what the play would command. The public read is sharply negative (F Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
Length
4 years
Total Value
$4.1M
Guaranteed
$102K
AAV
$1.0M/yr
Matt Lee's four-year, $4.1M deal with Cincinnati registers as a fair deal that slightly favors the Bengals, earning a C+ CVI that reflects solid value for a depth center. At just $1.0M AAV with minimal guaranteed money, this contract represents the type of low-risk investment teams make when securing reliable interior line depth without breaking the bank. Lee enters his prime years as a proven backup who can step in when needed, making the modest annual commitment reasonable for a player in that tier. The contract structure heavily favors Cincinnati with only $100K guaranteed, giving them maximum flexibility to move on if Lee doesn't fit their system or if younger players emerge. This signing fills a clear roster need at center depth while maintaining the financial flexibility to address bigger priorities, representing the kind of prudent roster management that championship contenders execute throughout the offseason.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where Matt's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Matt Lee's release by the Cincinnati Bengals tells the full story of his short NFL tenure — a seventh-round center drafted 237th overall in 2024 who never established himself as even a viable backup option at the position. In just five games of action across his two seasons, Lee failed to carve out a defined role on the offensive line, and the Bengals ultimately determined that his development trajectory didn't justify the roster spot. For a late-round pick, the margin for error is razor-thin, and Lee couldn't clear the bar of replacement-level production that would have made him a credible depth piece. The cut lands especially hard because it exposes a real vulnerability at backup center — Cincinnati now faces the uncomfortable reality of scouring the waiver wire and free agency to fill a position that should have been addressed through the draft process. At 24, Lee is young enough that another team might take a flier on him, but the Bengals' decision signals he hasn't shown the technical consistency or football IQ required to hold an NFL roster spot. This move has justifiably drawn scrutiny toward the front office's ability to evaluate interior offensive linemen in the late rounds, and with the regular season still 134 days away, Cincinnati needs to solve this depth problem before it becomes a Week 1 liability.
Matt Lee ranks 48th of 71 graded centers by performance. That slots Matt between Willie Lampkin (D+) just ahead and Brett Toth (F) just behind.
Graded higher
Willie LampkinPhiladelphia EaglesD+Jerome CarvinJacksonville JaguarsD+Sedrick Van Pran-grangerBuffalo BillsDGraded lower
Brett TothSan Francisco 49ersThe media and fanbase are deeply concerned about Matt Lee's situation with the Cincinnati Bengals, earning him an F grade in public perception. Multiple outlets are framing any roster decisions involving the young center as "concerning moves" that expose Cincinnati's glaring offensive line depth problems. The narrative centers on the Bengals potentially losing a 2024 seventh-round developmental piece before he could provide meaningful backup value, which has fans rightfully alarmed given the franchise's troubling history with offensive line fragility and Joe Burrow's injury concerns. Media coverage consistently highlights how Cincinnati now faces an "immediate need" at backup center, with analysts calling for the organization to prioritize adding proven depth before the season opener. The overwhelming sentiment reflects legitimate worry about the Bengals' ability to protect their franchise quarterback, with Lee's situation serving as a symbol of the team's ongoing struggles to build adequate offensive line insurance.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Matt Lee is a player in his 2nd NFL season listed at C for the Cincinnati Bengals. FanVerdicts covers every NFL player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Matt Lee, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C+, Performance D-, Sentiment F.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NFL game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NFL hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NFL player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.