
QB · Minnesota Vikings
2 transactions this offseason
Height
5'10"
Weight
207 lbs
Age
28
College
Oklahoma
Draft
Undrafted
Experience
7 yrs
QB Rank
#16 / 106
Grade Kyler Murray
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Kyler Murray grades out as a strong QB for Minnesota Vikings (B+ Performance). That places him 16th of 106 graded quarterbacks. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at B, good value. The public read is positive (B+ Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | Yards | TD | INT | RTG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 87 | 20,460 | 121 | 60 | 92.2 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 5 | 962 | 6 | 3 | 88.6 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 17 | 3,851 | 21 | 11 | 93.5 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$1.3M
AAV
$1.3M/yr
Minnesota Vikings got a B Contract Value Index out of the Kyler Murray signing because the guaranteed money matches the production tier. At $1.3M AAV on a one-year deal, Murray is priced as a depth option or bridge starter—a realistic valuation for a 28-year-old veteran entering his seventh season who has seen his market standing erode from his 2019 Offensive Rookie of the Year peak. His B+ performance grade provides some cushion, but the 2025 season brought only five games of production, leaving the market thesis unproven in Minnesota's system. The Contract Value Index reflects that the Vikings have structured this deal with zero long-term commitment; one year means no dead cap risk, no years of regret, and complete flexibility to pivot if the quarterback competition tilts decisively toward the first-round pick. Media framing captures the duality perfectly—Murray arrives as a "high-upside reclamation project" with "legitimate starting credentials," yet he's simultaneously operating as a depth option rather than a franchise cornerstone, which is exactly what his modest salary communicates. The front office's recent roster moves (defensive signings, receiver shuffles, no offensive line reinforcement) suggest Minnesota is betting Murray can carry the load himself, betting that will not materially improve until his on-field production climbs to match the initial hype. This is astute contract construction for a calculated gamble: low risk, meaningful upside, and an escape hatch if the QB room dynamic resolves in McCarthy's favor.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the B band — a quick read on where Kyler's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Kyler Murray enters his seventh NFL season as a former No. 1 overall pick now tasked with resurrecting a Minnesota Vikings offense in transition. Earning a B+ performance grade, Murray remains a viable starting quarterback with a track record that outpaces his recent struggles. His career 92.2 passer rating and 67.1% completion rate reflect a player whose body of work runs deeper than a difficult recent stretch. This season, Murray's 68.8% completion rate sits meaningfully above the NFL average of 63.6%, and his 226.5 passing yards per game exceeds the league average of 189.3. His rushing production is legitimately elite — 33.6 rush yards per game dwarfs the NFL average of 12.3, echoing prime Lamar Jackson or Jalen Hurts comparisons in terms of dual-threat value. The concern lies in touchdown efficiency: his 3.88% TD rate falls short of the NFL average of 4.38%, and his 7.12 yards per attempt is merely functional rather than explosive. Most troubling is the trend line — grades of C- in 2023, C in 2024, and C- again in 2025 suggest Murray hasn't found consistent footing after his serious knee injury. Minnesota's offensive infrastructure will heavily influence whether he recaptures his 2021-level production. If his mobility stays intact and the Vikings invest in weapons around him, Murray's ceiling remains that of a legitimate playoff-caliber starter worth watching closely entering 2026.
Kyler Murray ranks 16th of 106 graded quarterbacks by performance. That slots Kyler between Joe Burrow (B+) just ahead and Dak Prescott (B) just behind.
Graded higher
Joe BurrowCincinnati BengalsB+Jordan LoveGreen Bay PackersB+C.j. StroudHouston TexansB+Graded lower
Dak PrescottDallas CowboysBVikings adding Murray creates intrigue but signals QB uncertainty rather than upgrades. Five headlines reveal internal dynamics concerns and competition narrative dominating coverage. Murray's talent ceiling suggests upside potential, yet his injury history and inconsistency remain red flags. Fans debate whether this energizes the room or indicates McCarthy's development problems. Success depends on Murray's health and whether O'Connell can unlock his mobility efficiently.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Kyler Murray is a player in his 7th NFL season listed at QB for the Minnesota Vikings. FanVerdicts covers every NFL player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Kyler Murray, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index B, Performance B+, Sentiment B+.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NFL game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NFL hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NFL player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 2023 | ![]() | 8 | 1,799 | 10 | 5 | 89.4 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 11 | 2,368 | 14 | 7 | 87.2 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 14 | 3,787 | 24 | 10 | 100.6 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 16 | 3,971 | 26 | 12 | 56.3 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 16 | 3,722 | 20 | 12 | 52.1 |
Updated May 24, 2026
Recent seasons are weighted more heavily in the overall performance grade.
C-
2025
(50% weight)
C
2024
(30% weight)
C-
2023
(20% weight)
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.