
#58 LB · Minnesota Vikings
1 transaction this offseason
Height
6'3"
Weight
259 lbs
Age
29
College
Florida
Draft
2020, Rd 3, #90
Experience
6 yrs
LB Rank
#70 / 338
Grade Jonathan Greenard
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Jonathan Greenard grades out as a strong LB for Minnesota Vikings (B Performance). That places him 70th of 338 graded linebackers. The contract is harder to defend: the Contract Value Index calls it fairly priced (C-), with the cost outrunning the output. The public read is very positive (A- Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | Tkl | Sacks | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 78 | 217 | 38.0 | 1 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 12 | 38 | 3.0 | 0 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 17 | 59 | 12.0 | 0 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 15 |
Length
4 years
Total Value
$60.0M
Guaranteed
$50.0M
AAV
$30.0M/yr
Salary-cap math on Jonathan Greenard's contract works out to a C- Contract Value Index given the dead-cap exposure and term. At $30M AAV over four years, Greenard is being compensated at a level typically reserved for elite pass rushers or franchise-caliber defensive anchors—a tier he does not consistently occupy. His 2025 season production of 38 tackles and 3 sacks across 12 games reflects a solid-starter profile: reliable, professional, and productive enough to justify a roster spot, but lacking the dominant pressure metrics or tackle-for-loss frequency that would command premium dollars. The real tension in this deal is the gap between his compensation and his positional scarcity: the market for edge rushers and linebackers with proven NFL experience is robust, but Greenard's $30M AAV positions him as a centerpiece rather than a complementary piece, which is a structural mismatch. Minnesota's recent pivots—releasing multiple receivers, signing depth linebackers like Jake Golday, and bringing in defensive line help at Isaiahh Loudermilk—underscore that the Vikings viewed Greenard as replaceable enough to trade for multiple draft picks, a decision that ESPN-driven criticism has called into question but that also validates the organization's assessment that his contract was better allocated elsewhere. The four-year term compounds the concern, locking the Eagles into escalating cap commitments to a player whose production has been consistent but not explosive, making this a contract that earns fair value only if he significantly elevates his play in Philadelphia's scheme.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where Jonathan's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Jonathan Greenard has developed into a legitimate pass-rush threat in his sixth NFL season, earning a solid B grade as a starting edge presence for Minnesota. After years of flashing upside in Houston, he's now a reliable starter commanding attention from offensive coordinators weekly. Among veteran edge defenders at his experience level, Greenard sits comfortably above average and trending in the right direction. His calling card this season is his elite TFL production, posting 0.88 tackles for loss per game against an NFL average of just 0.27 — a genuinely elite backfield disruption rate. His sack rate of 0.25 per game also clears the league average of 0.15, confirming he's a legitimate threat on passing downs. His tackles per game sit at a modest 3.17, slightly above the 2.19 average, though pass deflections at 0.25 per game remain pedestrian and won't define his value. Greenard's grade has climbed steadily from a C+ in 2023 to back-to-back B- marks in 2024 and 2025, suggesting a player finding his footing as a true starter rather than a rotational piece. If his TFL dominance carries into next season alongside continued sack production, an A-range ceiling isn't out of reach. The key question is whether he can sustain that backfield disruption rate over a full 17-game schedule without fading late in the season.
Jonathan Greenard ranks 70th of 338 graded linebackers by performance. That slots Jonathan between Kyzir White (B) just ahead and Cole Holcomb (B) just behind.
Graded higher
Kyzir WhiteSan Francisco 49ersBCody BartonTennessee TitansBKenneth Murray Jr.Free AgentBGraded lower
Cole HolcombPittsburgh SteelersEagles addressed pass rush with a proven veteran in Greenard. Media consensus praises the acquisition as smart depth and competitive upgrade. Trading two third-round picks signals Philadelphia values immediate defensive help. Fans highlight his $100M deal and willingness to compete at elite level. Greenard should provide consistent pressure opposite established Eagles defenders going forward.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Jonathan Greenard is a player in his 6th NFL season listed at LB for the Minnesota Vikings. FanVerdicts covers every NFL player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Jonathan Greenard, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C-, Performance B, Sentiment A-.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NFL game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NFL hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NFL player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 52 |
| 12.5 |
| 0 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 8 | 16 | 1.5 | 1 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 13 | 33 | 8.0 | 0 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 13 | 19 | 1.0 | 0 |
Updated Jun 6, 2026
Recent seasons are weighted more heavily in the overall performance grade.
B-
2025
(50% weight)
B-
2024
(30% weight)
C+
2023
(20% weight)
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.