
#26 RB · Washington Commanders
1 transaction this offseason
Height
5'9"
Weight
205 lbs
Age
30
College
Boise State
Draft
Undrafted
Experience
5 yrs
RB Rank
#125 / 175
Grade Jeremy Mcnichols
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Jeremy Mcnichols grades out as a shaky RB for Washington Commanders (D+ Performance). That places him 125th of 175 graded running backs. Against that production, his deal reads as fairly priced on the Contract Value Index (C-) — the team is paying below what the play would command. The public read is positive (B- Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | Yards | TD | YPC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 65 | 846 | 6 | 4.5 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 17 | 221 | 1 | 5.0 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 17 | 261 | 4 | 4.7 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 3 |
Guaranteed
$563K
AAV
$1.5M/yr
Jeremy McNichols' Contract Value Index lands at C-, putting the deal in a defined slice of comparable signings. At $1.49M AAV, McNichols represents a modest depth commitment that aligns with his production tier—the 2025 season saw him accumulate 196 receiving yards across 17 games, a limited but consistent role that justified the Commanders' decision to retain him as an established veteran heading into the offseason. The salary sits comfortably below the market for starting-caliber backs, reflecting his reality as a reliably productive depth piece rather than a position cornerstone, and his appearance on an NFL top-10 list signals legitimate special teams value that offsets pedestrian offensive touches. At 30 years old with eight seasons of experience, McNichols has settled into the career trajectory of a multi-phase contributor—not a starting back with upside, but a known quantity that coaching staffs deploy with confidence in situational packages. The media consensus frames this as a sensible continuity move that stabilizes the backfield without committing premium resources, and the Commanders' subsequent signings at running back indicate they view him as a complementary piece rather than a primary option. This deal carries minimal risk given its one-year structure and modest cap footprint, making it the kind of low-leverage retention that allows Washington flexibility elsewhere on the roster.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where Jeremy's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Jeremy McNichols produces at a tier that grades a D+ performance mark for Washington. At 30 years old and eight seasons into his NFL career, McNichols occupies the replacement-level end of the running back spectrum—a depth piece whose on-field contributions are marginal relative to the demands of the position. His 2025 season output of 196 receiving yards across 17 games illustrates the limited offensive touches he commanded, a stat line befitting a situational back rather than a meaningful ball-carrier. Where McNichols carves out utility is in the special teams and pass-catching role, a niche that justified his re-signing despite the modest production numbers. The Commanders' roster moves—including the signing of RB Kaytron Allen in early May—confirm that McNichols slots into a depth-and-versatility lane rather than a feature-back role, a reality that aligns with media framing positioning him as "quality depth" who provides continuity without threatening for meaningful snap share. At this stage of his career, McNichols functions as the kind of proven, low-risk depth contributor who allows coaching staffs to address other roster needs, not a player whose performance warrants starting reps or significant offensive investment.
Jeremy Mcnichols ranks 125th of 175 graded running backs by performance. That slots Jeremy between Samaje Perine (D+) just ahead and Jaret Patterson (D+) just behind.
Graded higher
Samaje PerineCincinnati BengalsD+Devin NealJacksonville JaguarsD+Kendall MiltonCincinnati BengalsD+Graded lower
Jaret PattersonLos Angeles ChargersJeremy McNichols' re-signing with Washington earned a B- sentiment grade, reflecting measured approval for a sensible depth move that prioritizes continuity over upside. The media framed this as a reliable veteran retention that keeps the Commanders' backfield stable, with multiple outlets covering the signing—unusual attention for a typical depth piece that signals McNichols has carved out legitimate value beyond just roster filler. His appearance on an NFL top-10 list suggests he brings tangible special teams contributions and situational versatility that coaches clearly value. While fans appreciate the continuity and proven reliability, there's underlying sentiment questioning whether Washington missed an opportunity to upgrade the position with a higher-ceiling back who could push for meaningful touches. The consensus views McNichols as quality depth who won't threaten for a starting role but provides the kind of steady, multi-phase contributions that keep coaching staffs comfortable with their roster construction.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Jeremy Mcnichols is a player in his 5th NFL season listed at RB for the Washington Commanders. FanVerdicts covers every NFL player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Jeremy Mcnichols, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C-, Performance D+, Sentiment B-.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NFL game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NFL hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NFL player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 2021 | ![]() | 14 | 156 | 0 | 3.8 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 16 | 204 | 1 | 4.3 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 1 | — | — | — |
| 2018 | ![]() | 1 | 4 | 0 | 2.0 |
| 2017 | ![]() | 2 | — | — | — |
Updated Jun 8, 2026
Recent seasons are weighted more heavily in the overall performance grade.
D
2025
(50% weight)
D+
2024
(30% weight)
C-
2023
(20% weight)
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.