Jarrett Kingston

Current Contract

Contract Value Index (CVI)

Houston struck a sensible low-risk gamble with Jarrett Kingston's one-year, $1.1M deal, earning a solid C+ CVI that reflects prudent roster management rather than marquee acquisition. At just over $1M annually with zero guaranteed money, this represents textbook depth signing economics — the Texans can evaluate Kingston's fit without any meaningful financial commitment while addressing interior line depth. The complete lack of guaranteed money gives Houston maximum flexibility to move on if Kingston doesn't prove he belongs, making this essentially a training camp audition with minimal downside exposure. While Kingston's performance tier remains unclear, the contract structure suggests the Texans view him as a developmental piece or emergency depth option rather than expecting immediate starter-level production. This deal exemplifies smart salary cap stewardship — Houston gets to kick the tires on a guard prospect without handicapping their ability to pursue higher-impact acquisitions elsewhere on the roster.

Contracts in the Same Value Band

Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where Jarrett's contract sits relative to comparable money.

Performance Analysis

Jarrett Kingston grades out as a replacement-level guard at this stage of his career, and a D- performance grade reflects a second-year player who has not yet carved out a dependable role on Houston's offensive line. The data here is thin by design — two games of action across two professional seasons tells you everything about where he sits on the depth chart, and that volume alone signals a fringe roster presence rather than a developing starter. Houston's offseason activity at his position is telling context: the Texans signed Wyatt Teller and Evan Brown this spring, which is aggressive investment at guard that further complicates any path to meaningful snaps for Kingston. His rookie scale contract at $1.1M reflects his standing as organizational depth — the kind of low-cost insurance that teams carry precisely because the expectation is limited impact, not production. Media framing around Kingston has been defined entirely by routine administrative moves — practice squad transactions and ERFA re-signings — rather than any performance-driven narrative, which is itself a verdict on his standing. Drafted in the sixth round with pick 215 in 2024, the upside ceiling was always modest, and two seasons in, nothing in the public record suggests that assessment has changed. Unless he forces the issue in training camp this summer with the regular season 130 days out, Kingston looks locked into a depth designation with a tenuous grip on a final roster spot.

How Jarrett Compares at the Position

Jarrett Kingston ranks 118th of 172 graded gs by performance. That slots Jarrett between Doug Nester (D+) just ahead and Lecitus Smith (F) just behind.

Current Sentiment

Jarrett Kingston exists in the media dead zone that swallows most sixth-round offensive linemen, and his D+ sentiment grade reflects that near-total absence of public discourse rather than any active backlash. Coverage surrounding the 26-year-old guard has been limited exclusively to administrative roster transactions — practice squad signings, re-signings, and ERFA tender news — with no beat writer analysis, competitive storylines, or developmental buzz cutting through to fans or national audiences. That narrative vacuum aligns squarely with his D- performance grade; appearing in just two games during the 2025 season, Kingston has given observers almost nothing to evaluate, and indifference is the predictable result. Houston's offseason activity has only deepened the perception of his peripheral status — the Texans added guard Wyatt Teller and guard Evan Brown in March, signaling that the front office is investing meaningfully in offensive line upgrades above Kingston's roster tier. On a team carrying a nine-game winning streak into the offseason and clearly building toward sustained relevance, second-year depth pieces on rookie scale deals are not part of the conversation. Kingston's sentiment is best characterized not as criticism but as organizational invisibility — a fringe reserve occupying a roster spot without generating a shred of optimism or concern from anyone paying attention.