
#56 LB · Houston Texans
Height
6'0"
Weight
227 lbs
Age
25
College
Oregon
Draft
2024, Rd 6, #188
Experience
2 yrs
LB Rank
#311 / 338
Grade Jamal Hill
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Jamal Hill grades out as a shaky LB for Houston Texans (D Performance). That places him 311th of 338 graded linebackers. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at D+, a slight overpay. The public read is negative (D Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | Tkl | Sacks | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 20 | 10 | — | — |
| 2025 | ![]() | 12 | 6 | 0.0 | 0 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 8 | 4 | 0.0 | 0 |
Length
4 years
Total Value
$4.2M
Guaranteed
$189K
AAV
$1.1M/yr
Salary-cap math on Jamal Hill's contract works out to a D+ Contract Value Index given the dead-cap exposure and term. At $1.05M annually across four years, Hill's rookie scale deal is priced appropriately for a sixth-round pick, but the D-grade performance undermines any value proposition—his 2025 season yielded just six tackles across 12 games, the kind of minimal statistical output that defines a pure reserve role. For a linebacker in year two, this production total signals he has not established himself as a legitimate contributor, let alone someone capable of providing positional scarcity value that would justify even a modest cap commitment. The CVI grade reflects the disconnect between contract term (four years is long for depth at this stage) and actual on-field impact; Hill's rookie deal locks Houston into evaluating a player who appears to be organizational filler rather than a building block. The recent linebacker additions to the Texans' roster (K.C. Ossal signed in late May) further suggest Houston views Hill as replaceable depth rather than part of the team's linebacker solution. Unless Hill demonstrates a measurable role change or production spike during the upcoming season, this contract's full term will likely prove unnecessary, turning a low-dollar deal into a subtle cap inefficiency through redundancy.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the D band — a quick read on where Jamal's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Tape review and box-score baselines converge on a D performance grade for Jamal Hill. At 25 years old and entering his third NFL season, Hill remains a below-average contributor at linebacker—a position where even depth pieces are expected to accumulate tackle production and situational impact. His 2025 season output of 6 tackles across 12 games underscores the core problem: minimal statistical production that fails to justify meaningful playing time or argue for elevated roster status. Hill appeared in a dozen games but generated negligible impact, registering zero sacks and the kind of tackle totals that suggest he operated in limited snaps or struggled to diagnose plays effectively when on the field. As a sixth-round pick operating on a rookie-scale contract worth $1.1M annually, he occupies the exact organizational space where the Texans view him as replacement-level depth rather than a developmental building block—and his lack of measurable progress through two seasons offers little evidence he'll escape that tier. Unless Hill demonstrates a dramatic shift in production efficiency or earns a clearly defined role in Houston's defensive scheme during the 2026 campaign, his trajectory points toward the margins of the roster, competing for reserve linebacker snaps rather than establishing himself as a legitimate contributor to the defense.
Jamal Hill ranks 311th of 338 graded linebackers by performance. That slots Jamal between Levelle Bailey (D) just ahead and Cameron Goode (D) just behind.
Graded higher
Levelle BaileyDenver BroncosDDavid WalkerTampa Bay BuccaneersDMarkees WattsCleveland BrownsDGraded lower
Cameron GoodeMiami DolphinsJamal Hill's public perception reflects his status as a largely anonymous depth linebacker who has failed to make meaningful contributions through two NFL seasons. The media coverage—or lack thereof—tells the story of a player stuck in organizational limbo, with zero sacks and minimal impact plays despite ample time to establish himself as a legitimate contributor. His modest $1.1M annual contract signals that even the Texans view him as replacement-level depth rather than a building block, resulting in virtually no fan engagement or mainstream recognition. The absence of both positive breakthrough stories and concerning setbacks has left Hill in the most damaging position for an NFL player: complete irrelevance. For a linebacker entering his third season, this level of invisibility suggests he's running out of runway to prove he belongs as anything more than practice squad fodder, with his current trajectory pointing toward becoming another cautionary tale of unrealized potential in Houston's linebacker room.
No transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Jamal Hill is a player in his 2nd NFL season listed at LB for the Houston Texans. FanVerdicts covers every NFL player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Jamal Hill, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index D+, Performance D, Sentiment D.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NFL game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NFL hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NFL player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
Recent seasons are weighted more heavily in the overall performance grade.
D-
2025
(50% weight)
D
2024
(30% weight)
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.