
#33 LB · Free Agent
Height
6'1"
Weight
213 lbs
Age
30
College
LSU
Draft
2017, Rd 1, #6
Experience
9 yrs
LB Rank
#64 / 338
Grade Jamal Adams
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Jamal Adams grades out as a strong LB for Free Agent (B Performance). That places him 64th of 338 graded linebackers. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at B-, good value. The public read is mixed (C+ Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | Tkl | Sacks | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | 102 | 546 | 22.5 | 4 | |
| 2025 | ![]() | 17 | 45 | 1.0 | 0 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 5 | 7 | 0.0 | 0 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 9 | 48 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$1.3M
AAV
$1.3M/yr
The Jamal Adams signing at $1.3M represents a shrewd low-risk gamble that earns a B- CVI, positioning him as a potential value pickup for a defense willing to bet on bounce-back ability. Adams, once an elite safety who commanded $17.5M annually from Seattle, has seen his stock crater due to injury concerns and positional uncertainty, but this rotational player contract removes virtually all downside while preserving upside if he can recapture even a fraction of his former All-Pro form. At 28, he's young enough to have meaningful football left, and the single-year structure gives both sides flexibility to reassess without long-term commitment. The linebacker designation suggests teams view him as a hybrid defender who can contribute in sub-packages and special situations rather than as a every-down player, which aligns perfectly with his current market value. For a franchise looking to add veteran depth with championship experience, this B- CVI deal represents exactly the type of calculated roster building that separates smart front offices from those that overpay for past production.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the B band — a quick read on where Jamal's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Jamal Adams enters free agency as a nine-year veteran and former top-six pick whose elite ceiling made him one of the most hyped safeties of his generation. Now playing a hybrid linebacker role, he earns a B overall grade — respectable, but no longer reflective of his Pro Bowl peak. At 30, he remains a serviceable veteran presence, though his window as a difference-maker is narrowing. Adams' tackle rate of 2.65 per game sits above the NFL average of 2.19, confirming he still contributes reliably in run support and short-zone coverage. However, his sack rate of 0.06 per game trails the league average of 0.15, a concerning dip for a player once celebrated as a blitz specialist. His TFL rate of 0.26 per game nearly matches the NFL average of 0.27, suggesting functional but unspectacular play in the backfield. The season trend tells the fuller story — Adams graded C+ in 2023, slipped to D+ in 2024, and checked in at C- in 2025, a volatile trajectory that raises durability and consistency concerns for any prospective team. His best football may be behind him, but a scheme-specific role — think Tampa 2 linebacker or rotational chess piece — could help him stabilize. Teams seeking a veteran locker-room presence with residual positional versatility will find Adams a low-risk, moderate-reward signing in free agency.
Jamal Adams ranks 64th of 338 graded linebackers by performance. That slots Jamal between Mack Wilson Sr (B) just ahead and Logan Wilson (B) just behind.
Graded higher
Mack Wilson SrBMack Wilson Sr.Arizona CardinalsBChristian RozeboomTampa Bay BuccaneersBGraded lower
Logan WilsonDallas CowboysBJamal Adams enters 2026 free agency as a veteran depth linebacker with a modest nine-year resume marked by solid but unspectacular production—22.5 career sacks and four interceptions without Pro Bowl or All-Pro recognition. Media coverage remains largely neutral, positioning him as a potential reclamation candidate for teams like the Raiders rather than a marquee free agent, reflecting his status as a role player rather than a franchise cornerstone. Recent headlines focus on generic free agency churn and roster construction rather than any specific endorsement or criticism of Adams himself, indicating minimal buzz in either direction. His $1.3M salary floor suggests teams view him as a low-risk, veteran presence rather than a premium signing, consistent with his career trajectory as a reliable but unheralded contributor. Overall perception reflects a journeyman linebacker in the twilight of his career seeking a landing spot, with neither strong positive momentum nor concerning red flags driving current sentiment.
No transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Jamal Adams is a veteran in his 9th NFL season listed at LB for the Free Agent. FanVerdicts covers every NFL player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Jamal Adams, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index B-, Performance B, Sentiment C+.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NFL game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NFL hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NFL player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 0.0 |
| 0 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 1 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 12 | 87 | 0.0 | 2 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 12 | 83 | 9.5 | 0 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 14 | 75 | 6.5 | 1 |
| 2018 | ![]() | 16 | 115 | 3.5 | 1 |
| 2017 | ![]() | 16 | 83 | 2.0 | 0 |
Updated May 28, 2026
Recent seasons are weighted more heavily in the overall performance grade.
C-
2025
(50% weight)
D+
2024
(30% weight)
C+
2023
(20% weight)
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.