
QB · Arizona Cardinals
Height
6'1"
Weight
225 lbs
Age
30
College
Washington State
Draft
2019, Rd 6, #178
Experience
7 yrs
QB Rank
#97 / 106
Grade Gardner Minshew
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Gardner Minshew grades out as a poor QB for Arizona Cardinals (F Performance). That places him 97th of 106 graded quarterbacks. Against that production, his deal reads as fairly priced on the Contract Value Index (C) — the team is paying below what the play would command. The public read is mixed (C- Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | Yards | TD | INT | RTG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 63 | 11,987 | 68 | 35 | 88.0 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 4 | 37 | 0 | 1 | 21.0 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 10 | 2,013 | 9 | 10 | 81.0 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$5.8M
Guaranteed
$5.1M
AAV
$5.8M/yr
Arizona struck a fair deal with Gardner Minshew's one-year, $5.8M contract, earning a solid C CVI that reflects competent backup quarterback economics. While Minshew profiles as a depth piece rather than a franchise solution, his $5.8M AAV sits appropriately in the backup tier—especially for a player who's proven capable of stepping in and managing games when called upon. At 28, he's entering his prime years with enough starting experience (37 games) to provide legitimate insurance behind Kyler Murray without breaking the bank. The contract structure heavily favors Arizona with $5.1M guaranteed on just a one-year commitment, giving them flexibility to reassess their quarterback room next offseason while minimizing long-term risk. This signing represents smart roster building—paying market rate for a reliable backup who can keep the season afloat if Murray faces injury issues, without overcommitting resources to a non-starter position.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where Gardner's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Production at quarterback earns Gardner Minshew an F performance grade in the current sample. A 30-year-old seventh-year veteran thrust into a reserve role, Minshew appeared in just four games during the 2025 season, accumulating minimal tape and doing little to influence Arizona's abysmal 3-14 record or suggest he remains a viable starting-caliber option at his position. His limited exposure—a far cry from meaningful snap volume—underscores the reality that the Cardinals view him as organizational depth rather than a developmental asset or competitive alternative, a perception that aligns squarely with his demotion to backup status behind Jacoby Brissett entering 2026. With seven years of NFL experience and a career arc defined by journeyman reliability, Minshew has earned respect as a professional who understands scheme and can step in during emergency circumstances, but his playing time and production offer no evidence of upside or pathway back to starter consideration on this roster. Coach Mike LaFleur's diplomatic framing of both quarterbacks as "good fits in the system" is organizational cover language; the contract structure and offseason priorities—a flurry of roster moves across safety, linebacker, and defensive line—reveal that Arizona's quarterback future rests elsewhere. At this stage of his career, Minshew's sole value proposition is his availability and veteran presence on the bench, not his ability to elevate an NFL offense.
Gardner Minshew ranks 97th of 106 graded quarterbacks by performance. That slots Gardner between Will Howard (D-) just ahead and Drew Lock (F) just behind.
Graded higher
Will HowardPittsburgh SteelersD-Bailey ZappeNew York JetsD-Kyle MccordGreen Bay PackersFGraded lower
Drew LockSeattle SeahawksGardner Minshew's public perception heading into 2026 is best described as a collective shrug — a C- sentiment that captures widespread indifference rather than any strong positive or negative reaction. The narrative driving that grade is almost entirely transactional: his one-year deal to back up Jacoby Brissett generated confirmatory coverage rather than genuine intrigue, and coach Mike LaFleur's diplomatic comments about both quarterbacks being good fits in the system read as roster management language rather than any signal of open competition. That lukewarm reception aligns squarely with a D- performance grade, and the disconnect isn't surprising — Minshew appeared in just four games during the 2025 season, doing little to shift the perception that his ceiling on this roster is a capable emergency option rather than a legitimate starter. The Cardinals' recent offseason activity — a wave of late-April signings at safety, linebacker, guard, tight end, and along the defensive line — reinforces the sense that Arizona is busy building around its core rather than treating the quarterback room as a priority story, which only further marginalizes Minshew's narrative footprint. At 29 with seven years in the league as a sixth-round survivor, there is a grudging respect for what he represents as a veteran safety net, but the market has clearly plateaued his value in the backup tier, and nothing about this signing or the surrounding coverage suggests that changes anytime soon.
No transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Gardner Minshew is a player in his 7th NFL season listed at QB for the Arizona Cardinals. FanVerdicts covers every NFL player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Gardner Minshew, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C, Performance F, Sentiment C-.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NFL game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NFL hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NFL player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 2023 | ![]() | 17 | 3,305 | 15 | 9 | 84.6 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 5 | 663 | 3 | 3 | 83.4 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 4 | 439 | 4 | 1 | 104.8 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 9 | 2,259 | 16 | 5 | 52.1 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 14 | 3,271 | 21 | 6 | 52.1 |
Updated Jun 2, 2026
Recent seasons are weighted more heavily in the overall performance grade.
D+
2025
(50% weight)
D+
2024
(30% weight)
D+
2023
(20% weight)
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.