
#5 WR · Washington Commanders
1 transaction this offseason
Height
6'0"
Weight
195 lbs
Age
26
College
North Carolina
Draft
2021, Rd 3, #82
Experience
5 yrs
WR Rank
#196 / 295
Grade Dyami Brown
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Dyami Brown grades out as a middling WR for Washington Commanders (C- Performance). That places him 196th of 295 graded wide receivers. The contract is harder to defend: the Contract Value Index calls it a slight overpay (D), with the cost outrunning the output. The public read is positive (B- Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | Rec | Yards | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | 77 | 79 | 1,011 | 5 | |
| 2025 | ![]() | 14 | 20 | 227 | 1 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 16 | 30 | 308 | 1 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 17 | 12 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$3.0M
AAV
$3.0M/yr
This one-year, $3M deal for Dyami Brown represents a slight overpay for an unproven commodity who hasn't delivered on his draft pedigree. The former third-round pick has struggled to carve out a consistent role in Washington's receiving corps, making this $3M AAV investment a questionable allocation of resources for a player whose production remains largely theoretical. At 25, Brown is theoretically entering his prime years, but three seasons of minimal impact suggest he's closer to replacement-level than the reliable contributor this contract suggests the Commanders view him as. The one-year structure does limit long-term risk, essentially making this a prove-it deal where Washington can walk away cleanly if Brown continues to underwhelm. This D CVI reflects a franchise paying above-market rate for potential rather than proven production — a gamble that rarely pays dividends for receivers who haven't shown consistent NFL-level skills by their fourth season.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the D band — a quick read on where Dyami's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Per-game impact for Dyami Brown pencils out to a C- performance grade. Brown occupies a below-average tier among NFL receivers—his 2025 season production of 227 receiving yards across 14 games reflects the output of a depth piece, not a contributor expected to move the needle in Washington's passing game. The limited yardage total represents his primary weakness: an inability to generate consistent separation or reliability, which aligns with the narrative around his early-career inconsistency and drops that have dogged his five-year tenure since being drafted in the third round in 2021. On the durability front, Brown proved available (all 14 games), which is a floor-level positive for a veteran wideout, yet his per-game output underscores why Jacksonville declined to retain him. The gap between his B- sentiment grade and C- performance grade tells the real story: fans and media are banking on his claimed mental development during his Jacksonville year translating into improved production, but the tape and statistics haven't validated that optimism yet. For Brown to justify the cautious faith being placed in him, he'll need to demonstrate that his supposed improved football IQ actually converts to fewer mistakes and more reliable route running—right now, the resume suggests a rotational depth option, not the "reliable target" he's promised to become.
Dyami Brown ranks 196th of 295 graded wide receivers by performance. That slots Dyami between Cornelius Johnson (C-) just ahead and Kevin Austin Jr. (C-) just behind.
Graded higher
Cornelius JohnsonBaltimore RavensC-Pat BryantDenver BroncosC-Josh KellyHouston TexansC-Graded lower
Kevin Austin Jr.New Orleans SaintsThe Commanders faithful are cautiously optimistic about Dyami Brown's return, earning a B- sentiment grade despite his underwhelming on-field production. Multiple reports suggest Brown has matured mentally during his Jacksonville stint and now understands NFL concepts better than his inconsistent early career suggested, with fans banking on legitimate development rather than just hoping for a breakout. This positive narrative stands in stark contrast to his F performance grade, highlighting how much the perception hinges on potential growth rather than actual production — his 227 receiving yards across 14 games this season hardly screams impact player. The recent headlines emphasize Brown's eagerness to return to Washington and his self-awareness about needing to become more reliable, which resonates with a fanbase that remembers his playoff experience but also his frustrating drops. The sentiment reflects classic NFL optimism around a former third-round pick finding his footing as a veteran, even though the performance gap suggests fans might be setting themselves up for disappointment if Brown's supposed mental growth doesn't translate to consistent production.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Dyami Brown is a player in his 5th NFL season listed at WR for the Washington Commanders. FanVerdicts covers every NFL player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Dyami Brown, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index D, Performance C-, Sentiment B-.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NFL game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NFL hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NFL player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 168 |
| 1 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 15 | 5 | 143 | 2 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 15 | 12 | 165 | 0 |
Updated May 22, 2026
Recent seasons are weighted more heavily in the overall performance grade.
D
2025
(50% weight)
D
2024
(30% weight)
D
2023
(20% weight)
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.