Blake Freeland

Current Contract

Contract Value Index (CVI)

The Indianapolis Colts secured solid value with Blake Freeland's four-year, $4.7M extension, earning a C+ CVI that reflects a fair deal for a developing offensive tackle. At just $1.2M per year, this contract represents shrewd asset management for a young lineman who's shown flashes of competence in limited action. Freeland's age profile works heavily in Indianapolis' favor here — locking up a 25-year-old tackle through his prime developmental window at well below market rate gives the Colts significant upside if he continues progressing. The minimal $0.8M guarantee keeps the team's risk exposure incredibly low, essentially making this a low-cost lottery ticket on a player who could develop into a quality starter. While Freeland hasn't proven himself as more than a rotational piece yet, the contract structure allows Indianapolis to cut bait without major financial pain if he doesn't pan out, while potentially reaping huge rewards if he emerges as their long-term solution at tackle. This represents exactly the type of calculated gamble contending teams should be making on young talent.

Contracts in the Same Value Band

Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where Blake's contract sits relative to comparable money.

Performance Analysis

Blake Freeland is a third-year offensive tackle for the Indianapolis Colts, a former first-round selection still searching for consistent footing in the league after just 27 games played across three professional seasons. For a position where availability is the most foundational form of value, that number tells a concerning story — Freeland has yet to establish himself as a reliable weekly presence, falling well short of the threshold that separates developing players from true starters in this league. His performance grade reflects those struggles, earning an F designation that signals significant room for growth in both his execution and his ability to stay on the field. When Freeland has been available, the Colts have been working to unlock the athleticism and length that made him an enticing prospect, but translating raw physical tools into consistent, professional-level protection has proved elusive. Indianapolis needs answers along the offensive line to protect Anthony Richardson and sustain any semblance of offensive identity, which makes Freeland's development a franchise-level priority rather than a depth conversation. The upcoming season represents a pivotal crossroads — if he cannot demonstrate durability and meaningful improvement in Year 4, the Colts may be forced to look elsewhere for a long-term solution at the position. Watch for how the coaching staff deploys him in training camp and whether he can finally string together a full season's worth of snaps, because consistency, not ceiling, will define his professional legacy.

How Blake Compares at the Position

Blake Freeland ranks 173rd of 189 graded offensive tackles by performance. That slots Blake between Hakeem Adeniji (F) just ahead and Landon Young (F) just behind.

Current Sentiment

Blake Freeland enters the 2026 offseason with about as bleak a public perception as a depth offensive tackle can carry, an F-grade narrative driven almost entirely by the fractured right leg that cut his 2025 season to just two games before landing him on injured reserve. The injury has completely hijacked what little coverage Freeland generates, shifting the conversation away from any developmental trajectory and toward hard questions about durability and long-term viability at the NFL level. That sentiment aligns squarely with his on-field performance grade, which tells the same story — a third-year player drafted in the fourth round in 2023 who has yet to carve out a reliable starting role or accumulate any recognizable accolades through three seasons. The Colts' recent offseason roster activity compounds the skepticism: Indianapolis signed OT Luke Tenuta to an extension and added other contributors at multiple positions, signaling that the front office is actively reinforcing depth at the very spots where Freeland has failed to establish himself. The release of several fringe roster pieces in late April and early May underscores that this organization is trimming aggressively, and a minimum-contract tackle coming off a serious fracture is exactly the profile that ends up as a casualty of those evaluations. Until Freeland produces a clean recovery timeline and forces his way into the conversation during training camp, the prevailing narrative will remain one of roster vulnerability rather than opportunity — a depth piece on the wrong side of the depth chart conversation.