
#86 TE · Detroit Lions
1 transaction this offseason
Height
6'2"
Weight
245 lbs
Age
31
College
Harvard
Draft
Undrafted
Experience
7 yrs
TE Rank
#98 / 164
Grade Anthony Firkser
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Anthony Firkser grades out as a middling TE for Detroit Lions (C- Performance). That places him 98th of 164 graded tight ends. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at C, fairly priced. The public read is positive (B Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | Rec | Yards | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 76 | 123 | 1,260 | 5 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 7 | 8 | 53 | 0 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 7 | — | — | — |
| 2023 | ![]() | 2 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$1.3M
AAV
$1.3M/yr
Anthony Firkser's Contract Value Index lands at C, putting the deal in a defined slice of comparable signings. At $1.17M on a one-year deal for an established veteran at 31 years old, this contract reflects realistic market pricing for a depth tight end—neither an overpay nor a bargain, but a straightforward roster maintenance move. His 2025 season production of 53 receiving yards across 7 games underscores limited offensive opportunity, which aligns with his performance grade of C-; he remains a functional contributor rather than a high-volume option. The $1.17M AAV sits firmly in the below-starter range for the position, appropriate for a player with eight seasons of experience whose role is explicitly defined as veteran backup and camp body, as media framing consistently emphasizes. Detroit's recent addition of complementary pieces at multiple positions—including fellow depth signings at linebacker, edge, and receiver—suggests the Lions are building around depth competition and organizational continuity rather than targeting marquee upgrades, and Firkser fits squarely into that pattern. The one-year structure carries zero long-term cap commitment, making this a low-risk, no-upside depth transaction that poses negligible financial exposure to the organization.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where Anthony's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Anthony Firkser produces at a tier that grades a C- performance mark for Detroit. At 31 years old with eight seasons of NFL experience, Firkser occupies the established veteran depth category—a complementary tight end whose modest production output places him squarely in below-average starter to solid reserve territory. In the 2025 season, his 53 receiving yards across 7 games reflects the limited offensive role typical of a depth piece, far removed from featured tight end production. His strength lies in durability and familiarity within the system; media coverage emphasizes his functional integration with quarterback Jared Goff and the organizational confidence reflected in bringing him back, suggesting reliable hands and situational reliability in pass-game situations. The key weakness is production ceiling—his career totals (123 receptions, 1,260 yards) and current-season output underscore that he operates as a complementary weapon rather than a primary target, limiting his offensive impact. Firkser's role is best understood as insurance depth: he knows the system, keeps the chains moving in limited opportunities, but does not drive offensive game plans. His C- grade reflects a player who executes his role competently within the constraints of a backup/tertiary tight end profile, neither dragging down the offense nor elevating it.
Anthony Firkser ranks 98th of 164 graded tight ends by performance. That slots Anthony between Luke Farrell (C-) just ahead and Nick Vannett (C-) just behind.
Graded higher
Luke FarrellSan Francisco 49ersC-Payne DurhamTampa Bay BuccaneersC-Lucas KrullDenver BroncosC-Graded lower
Nick VannettLos Angeles RamsAnthony Firkser's public perception reflects the steady, workmanlike reputation of a reliable veteran depth piece rather than a difference-maker. The Detroit Lions tight end has cultivated modest positive coverage through his functional integration into the offense, with media consistently framing him as a dependable contributor who knows his role within the system. His seven-year NFL experience and affordable $1.2 million contract reinforce the narrative of a seasoned professional who brings stability without commanding significant attention or fan excitement. While recent coverage highlights his connection with Jared Goff and organizational confidence in re-signing him, Firkser's career production totals (123 receptions, 1,260 yards) underscore his status as a complementary player unlikely to generate breakout storylines. The media tone remains neutral-to-positive, reflecting appreciation for his veteran presence while acknowledging the ceiling limitations that place him firmly in above-average depth territory rather than as a featured offensive weapon.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Anthony Firkser is a player in his 7th NFL season listed at TE for the Detroit Lions. FanVerdicts covers every NFL player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Anthony Firkser, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C, Performance C-, Sentiment B.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NFL game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NFL hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NFL player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 2022 | ![]() | 11 | 9 | 100 | 0 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 15 | 34 | 291 | 2 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 16 | 39 | 387 | 1 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 15 | 14 | 204 | 1 |
| 2018 | ![]() | 12 | 19 | 225 | 1 |
Updated Jan 1, 1970
Recent seasons are weighted more heavily in the overall performance grade.
D
2025
(50% weight)
C-
2024
(30% weight)
C-
2023
(20% weight)
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.