
#3PG · Washington Wizards
Height
6'2"
Weight
164 lbs
Age
27
College
Oklahoma
Experience
7 yrs
Wingspan
6'3.0"
Reach
7'11.5"
Hand Size
8" × 9.25"
Grade Trae Young
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Trae Young grades out as a strong PG for Washington Wizards (B+ Impact). That places him 28th of 93 graded point guards. In his on-court role, the grade is strong (B Role), reflecting how he produces relative to others at his position. The contract is harder to defend: the Contract Value Index calls it a significant overpay (F), with the cost outrunning the output. The public read is very positive (A- Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 498 | 17.9 | 2.0 | 8.0 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 45.8% | 35.2% | 87.2% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 15 | 17.9 | 2.0 | 8.0 |
| Season | Team | GP | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 15 | 17.9 | 2.0 | 8.0 | 45.8% | B+ B+ |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 76 | 24.2 | 3.1 | 11.6 | 41.1% | B+ B+ |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 54 | 25.7 | 2.8 | 10.8 | 43.0% | A- A- |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 73 | 26.2 | 3.0 | 10.2 | 43.0% | A- A- |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 76 | 28.4 | 3.7 | 9.7 | 46.0% | A- A- |
| 2020-21 | ![]() | 63 | 25.3 | 3.9 | 9.4 | 43.8% | A- A- |
| 2019-20 | ![]() | 60 | 29.6 | 4.3 | 9.3 | 43.7% | A- A- |
| 2018-19 | ![]() | 81 | 19.1 | 3.7 | 8.1 | 41.8% | B B |
Grades reflect the player's performance in each season. Header grade shows the current season.
Length
2 years
Total Value
$95.4M
Guaranteed
$95.4M
AAV
$46.4M/yr
Trae Young's value math nets an F Contract Value Index relative to the league median at PG. At $46.4M AAV over two years, Young is operating at max-contract territory while delivering a B- performance grade — a misalignment that reflects the structural problem: he remains an elite offensive talent (17.9 PPG and 8.0 APG through 15 games in 2025-26), but the Wizards' 17-65 record and deliberate rebuild strip any competitive context from his individual production. For a point guard in his eighth season and at age 27, a max-level deal demands either championship-window urgency or a trajectory pointing toward sustained contention — neither applies here. Young's 2025 Cup All-Tournament Team honor and All-NBA 3rd Team selection in 2022 confirm his star-caliber ceiling remains real, yet the media narrative is increasingly bifurcated: genuine excitement about his talent and individual brand sits uncomfortably alongside skepticism about whether this organization can ever construct a winning product around him. The injury cloud hanging over the remainder of his season only compounds the value erosion, as a health setback in a non-competitive environment offers no offsetting playoff visibility. With two years remaining on this deal, Young is locked into a franchise in full-scale tank mode at precisely the moment when his prime years demand winning basketball — a mismatched timeline that explains the downward grade trend and justifies the CVI verdict.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the F band — a quick read on where Trae's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Trae Young ranks 28th of 93 graded point guards by performance. That slots Trae between T.J. McConnell (B-) just ahead and Andrew Nembhard (B-) just behind.
Graded higher
T.J. McConnellIndiana PacersB-CJ McCollumAtlanta HawksB-Fred VanVleetHouston RocketsB-Graded lower
Andrew NembhardIndiana PacersAuto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Trae Young is a player in his 7th NBA season listed at PG for the Washington Wizards. FanVerdicts covers every NBA player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Trae Young, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index F, Performance B-, Sentiment A-.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NBA game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NBA hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NBA player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 0.9 |
| 0.1 |
| 45.8% |
| 33.8% |
| 82.5% |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 76 | 24.2 | 3.1 | 11.6 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 41.1% | 34.0% | 87.5% |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 54 | 25.7 | 2.8 | 10.8 | 1.3 | 0.2 | 43.0% | 37.3% | 85.5% |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 73 | 26.2 | 3.0 | 10.2 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 43.0% | 33.5% | 88.6% |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 76 | 28.4 | 3.7 | 9.7 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 46.0% | 38.2% | 90.4% |
| 2020-21 | ![]() | 63 | 25.3 | 3.9 | 9.4 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 43.8% | 34.3% | 88.6% |
| 2019-20 | ![]() | 60 | 29.6 | 4.3 | 9.3 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 43.7% | 36.1% | 86.0% |
| 2018-19 | ![]() | 81 | 19.1 | 3.7 | 8.1 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 41.8% | 32.4% | 82.8% |
Trae Young earns a B- Performance grade this season — a quality starter-level point guard putting up solid numbers for the Washington Wizards. This season, Trae is putting up 17.9 points, 2.0 rebounds, and 8.0 assists per game across 498 games. Trae's strongest area is APG at 8.0, which compares favorably to the point guard median of 4.0. The biggest area for growth is RPG at 2.0 (point guard median: 5.0). Among 93 NBA point guards graded this season, Trae ranks 28th. Trae is a reliable contributor who the Washington Wizards can count on game to game.
Fan reaction and beat coverage cluster around an A- sentiment grade for Trae Young. The narrative around Young has undergone a genuine reset following his trade to Washington — media and fans are treating his arrival as a fresh start story, with his mid-season debut generating real excitement despite limited minutes and visible rust, proof that his elite offensive capabilities remain credible even in a low-stakes environment. His 2025-26 performance of 17.9 PPG and 8.0 APG across 15 games aligns reasonably well with his B- on-court grade, reinforcing that he is still an above-average playmaker capable of driving offense at a high level when healthy. However, the optimism is shadowed by two material headwinds: a reported injury threat that looms over his season availability, and Washington's deliberate rebuild — the Wizards sit at 17-65 and are actively tanking — which strips his individual brilliance of any competitive context at exactly the wrong moment for visibility. The broader perception tension is real and unresolved: Young is simultaneously a marquee star whose talent is undisputed and a player whose playoff relevance remains deeply uncertain, trapped in an organization whose peer reputation is so damaged that other players actively avoid signing there. His 2025 Cup All-Tournament Team honor still serves as a credibility anchor, reminding the audience his ceiling is star-level, but health uncertainty and organizational dysfunction are the twin forces that could stall momentum before next season begins.
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.