
#21SF · Denver Nuggets
Height
6'7"
Weight
225 lbs
Age
25
College
Stanford
Experience
1 yrs
Grade Spencer Jones
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Spencer Jones grades out as a shaky SF for Denver Nuggets (D+ Impact). That places him 95th of 119 graded small forwards. In his on-court role, the grade is middling (C- Role), reflecting how he produces relative to others at his position. Against that production, his deal reads as fairly priced on the Contract Value Index (C-) — the team is paying below what the play would command. The public read is mixed (C+ Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score. As a pro, expect these grades to move quickly as a real sample builds.
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 79 | 5.7 | 3.3 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 50.6% | 36.3% | 64.0% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 61 | 5.7 | 3.3 | 0.8 |
| Season | Team | GP | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 61 | 5.7 | 3.3 | 0.8 | 50.6% | D+ D+ |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 20 | 1.3 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 32.4% | D D |
Grades reflect the player's performance in each season. Header grade shows the current season.
| Date | OPP | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG | 3PT | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri, 5/1 | @ MIN | L 98-110 | 35 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3-4 | 2-3 | -9 |
| Tue, 4/28 | vs MIN | W 125-113 | 37 | 20 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$624K
Guaranteed
$624K
AAV
$624K/yr
Spencer Jones's contract with the Denver Nuggets earns a C- CVI — roughly what you'd expect for this level of production and salary. Spencer's production is currently below the league median for small forwards, which is the main factor pulling the CVI grade down. His $624K average annual value ranks as minimum-level money for the small forward market. The production lines up closely with the price tag, which is essentially paying fair market value. At 25, Spencer is entering his prime window — historically when small forwards post their best numbers. The 1-year deal limits the Denver Nuggets' downside — if the fit doesn't work, they'll have cap flexibility soon.
Spencer Jones earns a D- Performance grade, indicating below-average production relative to other NBA small forwards this season. Through 79 games, Spencer is contributing 5.7 points, 3.3 rebounds, and 0.8 assists per game in his role. Spencer's strongest area is FG% at 50.6, which compares favorably to the small forward median of 46.0. The biggest area for growth is APG at 0.8 (small forward median: 4.0). Among 119 NBA small forwards graded this season, Spencer ranks 95th.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where Spencer's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Spencer Jones ranks 95th of 119 graded small forwards by performance. That slots Spencer between Caleb Martin (D) just ahead and Keshad Johnson (D-) just behind.
Graded higher
Caleb MartinDallas MavericksDSvi MykhailiukUtah JazzDLuguentz DortOklahoma City ThunderDGraded lower
Keshad JohnsonMiami HeatAuto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Spencer Jones is a player on a rookie-scale contract listed at SF for the Denver Nuggets. FanVerdicts covers every NBA player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Spencer Jones, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C-, Performance D-, Sentiment C+.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NBA game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NBA hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NBA player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 0.8 |
| 0.5 |
| 50.6% |
| 40.1% |
| 61.7% |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 20 | 1.3 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 32.4% | 5.9% | 100.0% |
| 3 |
| 1 |
| 3 |
| 3 |
| 7-9 |
| 4-5 |
| +13 |
| Sun, 4/26 | @ MIN | L 96-112 | 25 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | -14 |
| Fri, 4/24 | @ MIN | L 96-113 | 28 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-3 | 2-2 | -5 |
| Tue, 4/21 | vs MIN | L 114-119 | 10 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | -4 |
| Sat, 4/18 | vs MIN | W 116-105 | 9 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-1 | 1-1 | +2 |
Fan reaction and beat coverage cluster around a C+ sentiment grade for Spencer Jones. The narrative around him is bifurcated: media outlets have positioned him as a feel-good breakout candidate after his playoff heroics, crediting him as a key factor in Denver's postseason survival and amplifying the human-interest angle of his journey from undrafted status to NBA contributor. Yet that rosy framing masks a harder reality underneath—his 2025-26 season production (5.7 PPG, 3.3 RPG, 0.8 APG across 61 games) remains modest, and recent headlines have pivoted sharply to expose defensive lapses and high-leverage mistakes that contradicted his playoff-run image. The performance grade of D- reflects genuine on-court struggles, and the sentimentContext makes clear that viral criticism over back-to-back game-winners and poor defensive metrics has eroded what initial organizational credibility his NBA contract conversion provided. Denver's investment in him signals belief, but the gap between the heartwarming narrative and the measurable production has widened enough that fan confidence is cooling—his standing as a bench-level contributor with visible flaws means he lacks the resume to weather sustained negative coverage, leaving the overall perception cautiously optimistic at best, increasingly skeptical at worst.
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.