
#7PG · Chicago Bulls
Height
6'2"
Weight
175 lbs
Age
21
College
Kentucky
Experience
1 yrs
Grade this player:
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 102 | 5.3 | 1.8 | 2.2 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 37.7% | 32.9% | 68.6% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 54 | 5.3 | 1.8 | 2.2 |
| Date | OPP | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG | 3PT | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon, 4/13 | @ DAL | L 128-149 | 30 | 25 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 11-18 | 1-5 | -19 |
Length
3 years
Total Value
$22.2M
Guaranteed
$13.5M
AAV
$6.6M/yr
Rob Dillingham's contract with the Chicago Bulls grades as a B- CVI — the team is getting good return on this investment relative to other point guards around the league. Rob's current production grades out in the middle of the pack among NBA point guards. His $6.6M average annual value ranks as role player money for the point guard market. The production-to-cost ratio is favorable — solid output at a reasonable price point represents good asset management. At 21, Rob has years of development ahead, which adds significant upside to this contract. The 3-year contract represents a moderate investment with room to exit if needed.
Rob Dillingham earns a C Performance grade — solid for a sophomore, with room to grow into a larger role. Through 102 games, Rob is contributing 5.3 points, 1.8 rebounds, and 2.2 assists per game in his role. Rob's best relative area is FG% at 37.7, though it still falls below the point guard median of 46.0. The biggest area for growth is PPG at 5.3 (point guard median: 15.0). Among 93 NBA point guards graded this season, Rob ranks 46th. At 21, Rob is still developing. The production should improve as he gains experience and a larger role with the Chicago Bulls.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
| 0.7 |
| 0.1 |
| 37.7% |
| 32.6% |
| 75.0% |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 3 | 2.7 | 0.7 | 2.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 37.5% | 50.0% | 50.0% |
Dillingham shows promise with Chicago but remains unproven after Minnesota disappointment. His C-grade performance and 7.7 PER reflect early-career inconsistency despite positive headlines. Wrist injury explanation provides context but doesn't guarantee improved results. Bulls organization publicly supports him, suggesting internal optimism outpaces external validation. At 1 year in, perception hinges entirely on whether emerging flashes become sustainable production.