
#29PG · Indiana Pacers
Height
6'4"
Weight
173 lbs
Age
27
College
Texas A&M
Experience
3 yrs
Grade Quenton Jackson
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Quenton Jackson grades out as a shaky PG for Indiana Pacers (D+ Impact). That places him 84th of 93 graded point guards. In his on-court role, the grade is shaky (D+ Role), reflecting how he produces relative to others at his position. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at D, a slight overpay. The public read is positive (B Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 79 | 8.6 | 2.2 | 2.4 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 46.7% | 34.9% | 80.1% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 39 | 8.6 | 2.2 | 2.4 |
| Season | Team | GP | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 39 | 8.6 | 2.2 | 2.4 | 46.7% | D- D- |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 28 | 5.8 | 1.6 | 1.9 | 47.5% | D D |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 3 | 0.7 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 0.0% | D+ D+ |
Grades reflect the player's performance in each season. Header grade shows the current season.
| Date | OPP | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG | 3PT | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun, 4/12 | vs DET | L 121-133 | 30 | 21 | 0 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 7-15 | 1-4 | -8 |
| Fri, 4/10 | vs PHI | L 94-105 | 27 | 16 |
Length
3 years
Total Value
$3.2M
Guaranteed
$3.2M
AAV
$1.1M/yr
Net of age, position, and term, Quenton Jackson's deal earns a D Contract Value Index. The contract—$1.06M AAV over three years—is a reasonable salary commitment for a fourth-year point guard, but the D grade reflects a stark mismatch between organizational investment and on-court output: across 39 games in the 2025-26 season, Jackson has averaged 8.6 points, 2.2 rebounds, and 2.4 assists per game, production that sits well below what you'd expect from a player being handed genuine job security. The Pacers' decision to convert him off a minimum deal onto a standard NBA contract signals real confidence in his ceiling and defensive activity, yet his current performance grade remains at F, creating a precarious foundation where sentiment is riding the contract announcement rather than proven results. For a 27-year-old in his fourth season, Jackson sits squarely in a prove-it window—the modest AAV gives the organization flexibility to retain him without cap strain, but that same low salary means he has limited margin for error before the optimism embedded in the signing begins to erode. The recent roster activity and exit interview coverage indicate the Pacers view him as part of their directional reset, which offers opportunity, but only if his counting stats and efficiency metrics trend meaningfully upward to justify the organizational commitment.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the D band — a quick read on where Quenton's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Quenton Jackson ranks 84th of 93 graded point guards by performance. That slots Quenton between Daniss Jenkins (D-) just ahead and Aaron Holiday (F) just behind.
Graded higher
Daniss JenkinsDetroit PistonsD-Isaiah StevensSacramento KingsFTyler KolekNew York KnicksFGraded lower
Aaron HolidayHouston RocketsAuto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Quenton Jackson is a player in his 3rd NBA season listed at PG for the Indiana Pacers. FanVerdicts covers every NBA player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Quenton Jackson, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index D, Performance F, Sentiment B.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NBA game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NBA hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NBA player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 0.6 |
| 0.2 |
| 46.7% |
| 37.2% |
| 81.5% |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 28 | 5.8 | 1.6 | 1.9 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 47.5% | 37.5% | 77.5% |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 3 | 0.7 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 9 | 6.2 | 0.9 | 1.7 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 45.2% | 8.3% | 77.3% |
| 4 |
| 6 |
| 1 |
| 0 |
| 6-15 |
| 2-8 |
| 0 |
| Thu, 4/9 | @ BKN | W 123-94 | 26 | 12 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 5-11 | 0-1 | +20 |
| Tue, 4/7 | vs MIN | L 104-124 | 25 | 9 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2-7 | 0-1 | -17 |
| Sun, 4/5 | @ CLE | L 108-117 | 29 | 15 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 5-14 | 1-4 | +3 |
| Fri, 4/3 | @ CHA | L 108-129 | 25 | 16 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 6-8 | 2-3 | -12 |
Quenton Jackson earns a F Performance grade, indicating below-average production relative to other NBA point guards this season. Through 79 games, Quenton is contributing 8.6 points, 2.2 rebounds, and 2.4 assists per game in his role. Quenton's strongest area is FG% at 46.7, which compares favorably to the point guard median of 46.0. The biggest area for growth is RPG at 2.2 (point guard median: 5.0). Among 93 NBA point guards graded this season, Quenton ranks 84th.
Public perception around Quenton Jackson sits at a solid B — meaningfully above where his on-court performance alone would place him, but grounded in a legitimate storyline that has earned the optimism. The defining narrative driving that sentiment is the contract elevation: converting Jackson off a minimum deal onto a three-year standard NBA agreement is the kind of organizational commitment that shifts a player's public profile overnight, signaling that the Pacers view him as a fixture rather than a depth placeholder. The disconnect between that warm reception and his D- performance grade is real and worth noting — in the 2025-26 season across 39 games, Jackson has posted 8.6 points, 2.2 rebounds, and 2.4 assists per game, numbers that reflect a developing role player still far from establishing himself as a reliable contributor on a team sitting at 19-63 in a brutal stretch run. His end-of-season exit interview coverage reinforces the narrative of a player invested in the organization's direction, and the modest but positive media footprint he's built suggests he's being perceived as part of the solution rather than a symptom of the losing. Recent roster moves — the trade for Ivica Zubac and the addition of Jalen Slawson — indicate a front office actively reshaping the roster, which creates both opportunity and competition for a player like Jackson who needs a defined role to develop. The bottom line is that Jackson's public narrative is riding the contract buzz more than his production at the moment, which is a fragile foundation — if his on-court performance doesn't trend upward to meet the organizational investment, that B sentiment grade has nowhere to go but down.
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.