
#93SF · Orlando Magic
Height
6'7"
Weight
215 lbs
Age
21
Draft
2025, Rd 2, #2
Experience
0 yrs
Grade Noah Penda
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Noah Penda grades out as a middling SF for Orlando Magic (C- Impact). That places him 82nd of 119 graded small forwards. In his on-court role, the grade is shaky (D+ Role), reflecting how he produces relative to others at his position. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at C, fairly priced. The public read is negative (D- Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score. As a prospect, expect these grades to move quickly as a real sample builds.
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 51 | 4.2 | 3.4 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 41.5% | 34.5% | 68.8% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 53 | 4.2 | 3.4 | 1.2 |
| Season | Team | GP | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 53 | 4.2 | 3.4 | 1.2 | 41.5% | D D |
Grades reflect the player's performance in each season. Header grade shows the current season.
| Date | OPP | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG | 3PT | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed, 4/22 | @ DET | L 83-98 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | +3 |
| Fri, 4/17 | vs CHA | W 121-90 | 6 | 4 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$1.3M
Guaranteed
$3.4M
AAV
$1.3M/yr
Noah Penda delivered enough rotation-tier impact to earn a C Contract Value Index against the NBA pay band. At $1.27M on a one-year rookie scale deal, Penda's contract carries minimal cap risk and reflects his second-round draft positioning; the value verdict rests on whether his 2025-26 season output of 4.2 PPG, 3.4 RPG, and 1.2 APG across 53 games translates into sustained rotation relevance or settles into bench-depth territory. His D performance grade signals that on-court production hasn't yet justified anything beyond a fringe role, yet the rookie deal structure itself is sound—the Magic are paying market rate for a 21-year-old in his first year, with no long-term salary obligation. What complicates the CVI picture is the sentiment disconnect: mediaFraming emphasizes internal organizational confidence and locker-room credibility (teammates have publicly praised his professionalism), but his D- sentiment grade and the recent mix of viral controversy and character-focused coverage reveal that public perception remains reactive and anchored to potential rather than performance. With Orlando sitting at the eight seed and the playoffs arriving in ten days, Penda's contract value will hinge entirely on whether he can convert the organizational goodwill into consistent minutes down the stretch—a short window for a rookie to prove the bet was worth making. For now, the C grade reflects a fair, risk-neutral rookie deal on a young prospect whose ceiling remains unclear but whose floor is protected by the low financial commitment.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where Noah's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Noah Penda ranks 82nd of 119 graded small forwards by performance. That slots Noah between Wendell Moore Jr. (D) just ahead and Jamison Battle (D) just behind.
Graded higher
Wendell Moore Jr.Detroit PistonsDJulian PhillipsMinnesota TimberwolvesDCam WhitmoreWashington WizardsDGraded lower
Jamison BattleToronto RaptorsNo transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Noah Penda is a player on a rookie-scale contract listed at SF for the Orlando Magic. FanVerdicts covers every NBA player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Noah Penda, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C, Performance D, Sentiment D-.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NBA game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NBA hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NBA player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 0.5 |
| 0.3 |
| 41.5% |
| 33.7% |
| 68.8% |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 2-2 |
| 0-0 |
| -1 |
Noah Penda earns a D Performance grade, indicating below-average production relative to other NBA small forwards this season. Through 51 games, Noah is contributing 4.2 points, 3.4 rebounds, and 1.2 assists per game in his role. Noah's best relative area is FG% at 41.5, though it still falls below the small forward median of 46.0. The biggest area for growth is PPG at 4.2 (small forward median: 15.0). Among 119 NBA small forwards graded this season, Noah ranks 82nd. At 21, Noah is still developing. The production should improve as he gains experience and a larger role with the Orlando Magic.
The talk around Noah Penda this stretch nets a D- sentiment grade. The Orlando Magic rookie's public perception has cooled noticeably over the past month, despite a foundation built almost entirely on isolated bright spots—a praised performance against Utah, favorable coverage from a high-profile Boston matchup, and consistent internal organizational backing that frames him as a "pro's pro" with genuine locker-room credibility. That narrative disconnect is the real story: his performance grade sits at a D, and his 2025-26 numbers of 4.2 PPG, 3.4 RPG, and 1.2 APG across 53 games reveal a second-round rookie still logging minutes without yet commanding them, which makes the media's cautious optimism feel thin and reactive. Recent headlines oscillate between the viral pregame handshake controversy—which drew criticism from former NBA voices but hasn't substantially damaged his standing—and character-focused praise, neither of which moves the needle on actual on-court impact as the Magic sit at the eight seed with the playoffs 11 days away. With Orlando actively reshaping the back end of its roster and the window for Penda to convert developmental promise into trusted rotation minutes closing fast, his perception remains anchored to ceiling potential rather than floor production—a fragile foundation for a young player fighting for relevance in a playoff-bound rotation.
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.