
#0PF · Charlotte Hornets
Height
6'7"
Weight
225 lbs
Age
28
College
Michigan State
Experience
6 yrs
Wingspan
6'9.5"
Reach
8'7.5"
Hand Size
9" × 9.75"
Grade Miles Bridges
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Miles Bridges grades out as a strong PF for Charlotte Hornets (B+ Impact). That places him 9th of 84 graded power forwards. In his on-court role, the grade is strong (B+ Role), reflecting how he produces relative to others at his position. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at B, good value. The public read is mixed (C- Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 501 | 17.1 | 5.8 | 3.2 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 46.0% | 33.8% | 82.5% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 77 | 17.1 | 5.8 | 3.2 |
| Season | Team | GP | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 77 | 17.1 | 5.8 | 3.2 | 46.0% | B- B- |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 64 | 20.3 | 7.5 | 3.9 | 43.1% | B+ B+ |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 69 | 21.0 | 7.3 | 3.3 | 46.2% | B B |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 80 | 20.2 | 7.0 | 3.8 | 49.1% | B+ B+ |
| 2020-21 | ![]() | 66 | 12.7 | 6.0 | 2.2 | 50.3% | B- B- |
| 2019-20 | ![]() | 65 | 13.0 | 5.6 | 1.8 | 42.4% | C+ C+ |
| 2018-19 | ![]() | 80 | 7.5 | 4.0 | 1.2 | 46.4% | D+ D+ |
Grades reflect the player's performance in each season. Header grade shows the current season.
| Date | OPP | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG | 3PT | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri, 4/17 | @ ORL | L 90-121 | 28 | 15 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5-12 | 1-6 | -29 |
| Tue, 4/14 | vs MIA | W 127-126 | 43 | 28 |
Length
2 years
Total Value
$47.8M
Guaranteed
$47.8M
AAV
$25.0M/yr
Miles Bridges' contract earns a B Contract Value Index, sitting where comparable NBA deals tend to settle. At $25M AAV over two years, the structure reflects what a 7-year veteran posting a B+ performance grade should command — and his 2025-26 season validates that assessment, with 17.1 PPG, 5.8 RPG, and 3.2 APG across 77 games marking him as a credible two-way contributor capable of carrying secondary offensive load. The salary sits squarely in the mid-tier forward market, neither punitive nor a bargain, which is exactly right for a player delivering solid starter-level production without elite scoring volume or defensive upside. At 28, Bridges is in the prime earning window of his career, and the front office clearly believes in his on-court value — the media narrative acknowledges his "genuine contributions" to Charlotte's system and his ascent up the franchise scoring charts. However, the CVI grade ceiling is templated by the disconnect between individual production and team results: the Hornets extended the NBA's longest active playoff drought with a Play-In elimination, and a $25M forward anchored to a losing environment can only carry so much contract value regardless of his per-game efficiency. The two-year term limits long-term downside risk, but without postseason traction, sentiment will remain muted and his market reputation will lag his actual on-court standing — a classic case of individual performance being outweighed by organizational failure at the contract-grading level.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the B band — a quick read on where Miles's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Miles Bridges ranks 9th of 84 graded power forwards by performance. That slots Miles between Lauri Markkanen (A-) just ahead and OG Anunoby (B+) just behind.
Graded higher
Lauri MarkkanenUtah JazzA-Paolo BancheroOrlando MagicA-Julius RandleMinnesota TimberwolvesA-Graded lower
OG AnunobyNew York KnicksNo transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Miles Bridges is a player in his 6th NBA season listed at PF for the Charlotte Hornets. FanVerdicts covers every NBA player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Miles Bridges, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index B, Performance B+, Sentiment C-.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NBA game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NBA hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NBA player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 0.6 |
| 0.4 |
| 46.0% |
| 33.3% |
| 82.2% |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 64 | 20.3 | 7.5 | 3.9 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 43.1% | 31.3% | 87.0% |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 69 | 21.0 | 7.3 | 3.3 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 46.2% | 34.9% | 82.5% |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 80 | 20.2 | 7.0 | 3.8 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 49.1% | 33.1% | 80.2% |
| 2020-21 | ![]() | 66 | 12.7 | 6.0 | 2.2 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 50.3% | 40.0% | 86.7% |
| 2019-20 | ![]() | 65 | 13.0 | 5.6 | 1.8 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 42.4% | 33.0% | 80.9% |
| 2018-19 | ![]() | 80 | 7.5 | 4.0 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 46.4% | 32.5% | 75.3% |
| 9 |
| 2 |
| 1 |
| 3 |
| 10-18 |
| 5-10 |
| -7 |
| Sun, 4/12 | @ NYK | W 110-96 | 24 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3-8 | 0-2 | +6 |
| Fri, 4/10 | vs DET | L 100-118 | 23 | 10 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 3-7 | 1-4 | -14 |
| Wed, 4/8 | @ BOS | L 102-113 | 32 | 13 | 12 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 5-9 | 1-4 | -4 |
| Fri, 4/3 | vs IND | W 129-108 | 26 | 19 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7-16 | 3-5 | +4 |
| Thu, 4/2 | vs PHX | W 127-107 | 27 | 25 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 10-16 | 4-8 | +12 |
Miles Bridges earns a B+ Performance grade this season — a quality starter-level power forward putting up solid numbers for the Charlotte Hornets. This season, Miles is putting up 17.1 points, 5.8 rebounds, and 3.2 assists per game across 501 games. Miles's strongest area is RPG at 5.8, which compares favorably to the power forward median of 5.0. The biggest area for growth is APG at 3.2 (power forward median: 4.0). Among 84 NBA power forwards graded this season, Miles ranks 9th. Miles is a reliable contributor who the Charlotte Hornets can count on game to game.
The public narrative around Miles Bridges has cooled sharply over the past two weeks, and the sentiment grade reflects a fanbase running out of patience with sustained organizational failure projected onto its most visible veteran. The core tension is straightforward: Bridges is valued for effort and flashes of genuine talent — a buzzer-block against Miami in the Play-In being the most recent exhibit — but the Hornets' Play-In elimination extended what is now the NBA's longest active postseason drought, and that weight lands squarely on the shoulders of a 28-year-old pulling $25M AAV. His B+ performance grade tells you the on-court production is real — 17.2 PPG, 5.9 RPG, and 3.3 APG across 67 games is a credible two-way contributor season — but a disconnect between individual output and team results is exactly the kind of friction that drives sentiment grades downward regardless of the box score. His exit interview messaging conveyed self-awareness and renewed motivation, which buys some goodwill in the short term, but Bridges has been here before rhetorically, and the results haven't consistently matched the urgency he projects publicly. The Hornets' recent roster churn — cycling through fringe players like Malaki Branham, KJ Simpson, and Tosan Evbuomwan in the span of days — paints a picture of a franchise still searching for the right complementary pieces, which amplifies the scrutiny on Bridges as the highest-profile anchor expected to elevate that uncertainty. Right now, the narrative sits at a precarious crossroads: the talent is undeniable and the effort is acknowledged, but without a postseason appearance to point to, fan frustration will continue bleeding onto the player most associated with this era of Hornets basketball.
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.