
#0SG · Sacramento Kings
Height
6'3"
Weight
200 lbs
Age
28
College
Kentucky
Experience
8 yrs
Grade Malik Monk
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Malik Monk grades out as a shaky SG for Sacramento Kings (D- Impact). That places him 32nd of 147 graded shooting guards. In his on-court role, the grade is strong (B+ Role), reflecting how he produces relative to others at his position. Against that production, his deal reads as good value on the Contract Value Index (B-) — the team is paying below what the play would command. The public read is positive (B+ Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 585 | 12.5 | 1.9 | 3.0 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 43.8% | 35.5% | 85.1% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 62 | 12.5 | 1.9 | 3.0 |
| Season | Team | GP | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 62 | 12.5 | 1.9 | 3.0 | 43.8% | B- B- |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 65 | 17.2 | 3.8 | 5.6 | 43.9% | B+ B+ |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 72 | 15.4 | 2.9 | 5.1 | 44.3% | B B |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 77 | 13.5 | 2.6 | 3.9 | 44.8% | B B |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 76 | 13.8 | 3.4 | 2.9 | 47.3% | B B |
| 2020-21 | ![]() | 42 | 11.7 | 2.4 | 2.1 | 43.4% | C C |
| 2019-20 | ![]() | 55 | 10.3 | 2.9 | 2.1 | 43.4% | C C |
| 2018-19 | ![]() | 73 | 8.9 | 1.9 | 1.6 | 38.7% | D+ D+ |
| 2017-18 | ![]() | 63 | 6.7 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 36.0% | D- D- |
Grades reflect the player's performance in each season. Header grade shows the current season.
| Date | OPP | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG | 3PT | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat, 4/11 | vs GSW | W 124-118 | 10 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4-6 | 3-4 | +3 |
| Wed, 4/8 | @ GSW | L 105-110 | 11 | 4 |
Length
3 years
Total Value
$60.6M
Guaranteed
$40.0M
AAV
$18.8M/yr
Malik Monk earns a B- Contract Value Index (CVI), a grade that reflects solid starter production at a fair-market rate, though one that sits slightly below the sentiment his recent performances have generated. His 2025-26 season stats—12.5 points, 3.0 assists, and 1.9 rebounds across 62 games—align with a dependable offensive contributor rather than a franchise cornerstone; the B- performance grade validates that tier, placing him squarely in the solid starter category rather than above-average territory. At $18.8 million annually over three years, the contract sits in reasonable alignment with what the market has paid non-All-Star guards of his experience level, neither a steal nor an albatross heading into what remains of the current season. At 28 years old with nine seasons of NBA experience, Monk occupies the established veteran bucket where consistency matters more than upside, and his CVI reflects that maturity—the deal prices in a known commodity, not lottery-ticket potential. The disconnect between his B- CVI and his B+ sentiment grade is revealing: media and fan perception have been lifted by clutch individual performances and his reputation as a reliable scoring spark plug, a narrative that outpaces his full-season production and the team's 22-60 record. Sacramento's recent roster activity—multiple depth signings rather than competitive upgrades—quietly undercuts any "championship window" framing, yet Monk's standing as a well-regarded, fair-value starter remains intact regardless of team trajectory. This is a contract that prices in exactly what Monk has delivered: a legitimate NBA rotation piece with genuine closing ability, neither overpaid nor a bargain.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the B band — a quick read on where Malik's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Malik Monk ranks 32nd of 147 graded shooting guards by performance. That slots Malik between Luke Kennard (B) just ahead and Kevin Huerter (B-) just behind.
Graded higher
Luke KennardLos Angeles LakersBReed SheppardHouston RocketsB-Cason WallaceOklahoma City ThunderB-Graded lower
Kevin HuerterDetroit PistonsNo transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Malik Monk is a veteran in his 8th NBA season listed at SG for the Sacramento Kings. FanVerdicts covers every NBA player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Malik Monk, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index B-, Performance B-, Sentiment B+.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NBA game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NBA hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NBA player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 0.6 |
| 0.4 |
| 43.8% |
| 39.5% |
| 87.8% |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 65 | 17.2 | 3.8 | 5.6 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 43.9% | 32.5% | 86.5% |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 72 | 15.4 | 2.9 | 5.1 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 44.3% | 35.0% | 82.9% |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 77 | 13.5 | 2.6 | 3.9 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 44.8% | 35.9% | 88.9% |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 76 | 13.8 | 3.4 | 2.9 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 47.3% | 39.1% | 79.5% |
| 2020-21 | ![]() | 42 | 11.7 | 2.4 | 2.1 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 43.4% | 40.1% | 81.9% |
| 2019-20 | ![]() | 55 | 10.3 | 2.9 | 2.1 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 43.4% | 28.4% | 82.0% |
| 2018-19 | ![]() | 73 | 8.9 | 1.9 | 1.6 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 38.7% | 33.0% | 88.2% |
| 2017-18 | ![]() | 63 | 6.7 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 36.0% | 34.2% | 84.2% |
| 1 |
| 1 |
| 1 |
| 0 |
| 2-3 |
| 0-1 |
| -2 |
Malik Monk earns a B- Performance grade this season — a quality starter-level shooting guard putting up solid numbers for the Sacramento Kings. This season, Malik is putting up 12.5 points, 1.9 rebounds, and 3.0 assists per game across 585 games. Malik's best relative area is FG% at 43.8, though it still falls below the shooting guard median of 46.0. The biggest area for growth is RPG at 1.9 (shooting guard median: 5.0). Among 147 NBA shooting guards graded this season, Malik ranks 32nd. Malik is a reliable contributor who the Sacramento Kings can count on game to game.
Malik Monk carries a B+ public sentiment grade heading into the stretch run of a 2025-26 season that has seen his reputation grow well beyond his role on the Kings' roster. The narrative engine driving that favorable perception is a 32-point eruption against Brooklyn that sent beat reporters and podcast analysts scrambling to reframe Monk not as a complementary piece but as an identity-defining player for Sacramento — the kind of clutch offensive spark plug a franchise builds around, not just alongside. That sentiment sits a notch above his B performance grade, which is a meaningful distinction: the public is buying into Monk's ceiling slightly more than his full-body-of-work production in the 2025-26 season warrants, where he has averaged 12.5 points, 3.0 assists, and 1.9 rebounds across 62 games as a solid starter at $18.8M annually. The perception picture is complicated, however, by Sacramento's 22-60 record and the franchise's recent roster activity — multiple signings of Killian Hayes and the addition of DaQuan Jeffries suggest a team cycling through depth options rather than making pointed competitive upgrades, which quietly undercuts the "playoff contender" framing that Monk's individual narrative depends on. Still, the trend line on public sentiment holds steady at B+, and for a non-All-Star guard whose clutch performances generate genuine headline traction on a lottery-bound roster, that is a genuinely strong standing — Monk has earned the reputation of a player the market respects even when his team's win column gives fans very little to cheer about.
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.