
#13PF · Sacramento Kings
Height
6'8"
Weight
225 lbs
Age
25
College
Iowa
Experience
3 yrs
Grade Keegan Murray
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Keegan Murray grades out as a poor PF for Sacramento Kings (F Impact). That places him 39th of 84 graded power forwards. In his on-court role, the grade is middling (C+ Role), reflecting how he produces relative to others at his position. Against that production, his deal reads as a slight overpay on the Contract Value Index (D-) — the team is paying below what the play would command. The public read is mixed (C+ Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 256 | 14.0 | 5.7 | 1.7 | 1.0 | 1.6 | 42.0% | 36.5% | 80.7% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 23 | 14.0 | 5.7 | 1.7 |
| Season | Team | GP | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 23 | 14.0 | 5.7 | 1.7 | 42.0% | B- B- |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 76 | 12.4 | 6.7 | 1.4 | 44.4% | B- B- |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 77 | 15.2 | 5.5 | 1.7 | 45.4% | B- B- |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 80 | 12.2 | 4.6 | 1.2 | 45.3% | C C |
Grades reflect the player's performance in each season. Header grade shows the current season.
Length
1 year
Total Value
$11.1M
Guaranteed
$35.3M
AAV
$11.1M/yr
Earning a D- Contract Value Index, Keegan Murray's 1-year pact reflects Sacramento's read on rotation impact. At $11.1M AAV, Murray is positioned as a mid-tier contributor on a team in evident flux, yet his 2025-26 season stats—14.0 PPG and 5.7 RPG across 23 games—underscore why the Contract Value Index has trended downward over the last month: he's delivering serviceable-but-unspectacular production for a fourth-year player carrying genuine organizational investment on the books. For a power forward in this salary band, the expectation is typically above-average rim protection and spacing consistency; Murray's current output lands comfortably in solid-starter territory at best, which leaves limited margin for error given the Kings' recent additions of Killian Hayes and active trade exploration around backcourt upgrades. The media narrative centers on a fundamental contradiction—the franchise committed $140 million over five years to signal long-term belief in Murray as a cornerstone player, yet recent surgical procedures and availability concerns have undercut that goodwill and muddied his role within Sacramento's evolving roster construction. With health questions persisting and the team appearing to build around instability rather than reinforcing him as the cornerstone, Murray's single-year CVI grade reflects a franchise hedging its organizational bet while waiting for both durability and consistent on-court performance to justify the extension. The 25-year-old has the physical tools and a proven All-Rookie pedigree from 2023, but until he bridges the gap between promise and production, his contract value remains suppressed by genuine doubt.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the D band — a quick read on where Keegan's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Keegan Murray ranks 39th of 84 graded power forwards by performance. That slots Keegan between Obi Toppin (C-) just ahead and Harrison Barnes (D+) just behind.
Graded higher
Obi ToppinIndiana PacersC-Norchad OmierLos Angeles ClippersD+CJ HuntleyPhoenix SunsD+Graded lower
Harrison BarnesSan Antonio SpursNo transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Keegan Murray is a player in his 3rd NBA season listed at PF for the Sacramento Kings. FanVerdicts covers every NBA player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Keegan Murray, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index D-, Performance D+, Sentiment C+.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NBA game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NBA hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NBA player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 1.0 |
| 1.6 |
| 42.0% |
| 27.7% |
| 77.6% |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 76 | 12.4 | 6.7 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 44.4% | 34.3% | 83.3% |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 77 | 15.2 | 5.5 | 1.7 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 45.4% | 35.8% | 83.1% |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 80 | 12.2 | 4.6 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 45.3% | 41.1% | 76.5% |
Keegan Murray earns a D+ Performance grade, indicating below-average production relative to other NBA power forwards this season. This season, Keegan is putting up 14.0 points, 5.7 rebounds, and 1.7 assists per game across 256 games. Keegan's strongest area is RPG at 5.7, which compares favorably to the power forward median of 5.0. The biggest area for growth is APG at 1.7 (power forward median: 4.0). Among 84 NBA power forwards graded this season, Keegan ranks 39th.
Keegan Murray carries a C+ sentiment grade right now, with NBA media framing his role on Sacramento as one suspended between organizational investment and real-world durability concerns. The dominant narrative centers on a fundamental contradiction: the Kings committed $140 million over five years to signal genuine belief in Murray as a cornerstone power forward, yet recent surgical procedures and availability reports have undercut that goodwill by raising legitimate questions about whether he can stay healthy enough to justify that bet. His 2025-26 season performance — 14.0 PPG and 5.7 RPG across 23 games — lands in serviceable-but-unspectacular territory for a player carrying extension-caliber expectations, and that gap between promise and production sits at the heart of the cautious tone. Sacramento's recent roster additions of Killian Hayes and DaQuan Jeffries, combined with persistent trade chatter around Ja Morant, paint a picture of organizational flux that makes Murray's long-term role feel murkier rather than clearer; the franchise appears to be building around instability rather than reinforcing him as the cornerstone. The public conversation has essentially reset from "can Sacramento win?" to "can Murray prove he's the developmental player this extension assumes?" — and right now, that narrative is steady but guarded, waiting for health and consistency before rewarding the faith the front office already showed.
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.