
#9SF · Washington Wizards
Height
6'6"
Weight
206 lbs
Age
24
College
Pittsburgh
Experience
4 yrs
Wingspan
6'9.5"
Reach
8'8.0"
Hand Size
8.75" × 8.5"
Grade Justin Champagnie
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Justin Champagnie grades out as a middling SF for Washington Wizards (C Impact). That places him 21st of 119 graded small forwards. In his on-court role, the grade is strong (B+ Role), reflecting how he produces relative to others at his position. Against that production, his deal reads as a clear bargain on the Contract Value Index (A+) — the team is paying below what the play would command. The public read is negative (D Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 187 | 8.7 | 5.6 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 50.2% | 34.6% | 75.9% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 69 | 8.7 | 5.6 | 1.2 |
| Season | Team | GP | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 69 | 8.7 | 5.6 | 1.2 | 50.2% | B- B- |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 62 | 8.8 | 5.7 | 1.0 | 51.1% | B- B- |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 15 | 5.9 | 3.5 | 1.3 | 41.0% | C- C- |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 5 | 2.2 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 33.3% | D- D- |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 36 | 2.3 | 2.0 | 0.3 | 46.3% | D D |
Grades reflect the player's performance in each season. Header grade shows the current season.
Length
3 years
Total Value
$8.0M
Guaranteed
$5.0M
AAV
$2.3M/yr
This signing grades out as an excellent deal for the Washington Wizards — the team is getting significantly more on-field production than what they're paying for. Justin's on-field performance ranks in the top 30% among NFL SFs, grading him as an above-average starter at the position. His $2.3M average annual value ranks as bargain money for the SF market. The value equation works strongly in the team's favor — they're getting above-average starter production at bargain cost, which is the kind of financial efficiency that builds roster depth. Justin is still in or near his prime, which adds to the deal's upside — the team should get multiple productive seasons out of this contract. The 3-year, $8.0M contract with $5.0M guaranteed (63%) represents a significant commitment with heavy guarantees.
Justin Champagnie earns a B Performance grade this season — a quality starter-level small forward putting up solid numbers for the Washington Wizards. Through 187 games, Justin is contributing 8.7 points, 5.6 rebounds, and 1.2 assists per game in his role. Justin's strongest area is RPG at 5.6, which compares favorably to the small forward median of 5.0. The biggest area for growth is APG at 1.2 (small forward median: 4.0). Among 119 NBA small forwards graded this season, Justin ranks 21st. At 24, Justin is still developing. The production should improve as he gains experience and a larger role with the Washington Wizards.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the A band — a quick read on where Justin's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Justin Champagnie ranks 21st of 119 graded small forwards by performance. That slots Justin between Saddiq Bey (B+) just ahead and Julian Champagnie (B) just behind.
Graded higher
Saddiq BeyNew Orleans PelicansB+Franz WagnerOrlando MagicB+Keldon JohnsonSan Antonio SpursB+Graded lower
Julian ChampagnieSan Antonio SpursNo transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Justin Champagnie is a player in his 4th NBA season listed at SF for the Washington Wizards. FanVerdicts covers every NBA player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Justin Champagnie, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index A+, Performance B, Sentiment D.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NBA game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NBA hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NBA player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 0.9 |
| 0.6 |
| 50.2% |
| 31.9% |
| 78.4% |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 62 | 8.8 | 5.7 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 51.1% | 38.3% | 68.5% |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 15 | 5.9 | 3.5 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 41.0% | 28.9% | 80.0% |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 5 | 2.2 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 33.3% | 20.0% | 0.0% |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 36 | 2.3 | 2.0 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 46.3% | 35.7% | 100.0% |
Justin Champagnie enters the 2025-26 season with a D-grade public perception that's been severely compromised by disciplinary issues overshadowing his on-court contributions. The fourth-year wing's media footprint is dominated entirely by his one-game suspension for an altercation with Oklahoma City's Ajay Mitchell, with every tracked headline framing the incident as a character failure rather than competitive intensity. As a minimum-contract player in Washington's rebuilding rotation, Champagnie lacks the star equity to absorb negative press cycles, making this disciplinary narrative particularly damaging to his public standing. The media's focus on the suspension has effectively buried his solid underlying metrics—including a PER above 17 and nearly 50% field goal shooting—that demonstrate legitimate NBA value. For a fringe rotation player on a rebuilding team, this kind of negative perception can be career-limiting, as front offices tend to avoid players who generate headlines for the wrong reasons. Champagnie will need an exceptionally clean and productive start to 2025-26 to shift the narrative back toward his playmaking ability and defensive versatility rather than his disciplinary record.
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.