
#20SG · Houston Rockets
Height
6'4"
Weight
213 lbs
Age
27
College
Georgia Tech
Experience
7 yrs
Wingspan
7'0.0"
Reach
8'6.0"
Hand Size
9" × 9.75"
Grade Josh Okogie
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Josh Okogie grades out as a shaky SG for Houston Rockets (D+ Impact). That places him 90th of 147 graded shooting guards. In his on-court role, the grade is middling (C- Role), reflecting how he produces relative to others at his position. Against that production, his deal reads as fairly priced on the Contract Value Index (C+) — the team is paying below what the play would command. The public read is mixed (C- Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 483 | 4.8 | 2.6 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 43.2% | 31.3% | 73.6% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 68 | 4.8 | 2.6 | 0.8 |
| Season | Team | GP | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 68 | 4.8 | 2.6 | 0.8 | 43.2% | D D |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 40 | 7.1 | 2.8 | 0.8 | 44.3% | B- B- |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 4 | 3.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 55.6% | F F |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 10 | 4.1 | 2.1 | 1.3 | 37.8% | D- D- |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | F F |
| 2020-21 | ![]() | 59 | 5.4 | 2.6 | 1.1 | 40.2% | D+ D+ |
| 2019-20 | ![]() | 62 | 8.6 | 4.3 | 1.6 | 42.7% | C+ C+ |
| 2018-19 | ![]() | 74 | 7.7 | 2.9 | 1.2 | 38.6% | C C |
Grades reflect the player's performance in each season. Header grade shows the current season.
| Date | OPP | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG | 3PT | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat, 5/2 | vs LAL | L 78-98 | 13 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 0 |
| Thu, 4/30 | @ LAL | W 99-93 | 18 | 7 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$2.3M
Guaranteed
$7.8M
AAV
$2.3M/yr
Cap-table math on Josh Okogie's contract works out to a C+ Contract Value Index given term and player option structure. At $2.3M AAV on a one-year deal, the contract itself is structurally sound for a bench wing—the salary aligns with his depth-piece status and carries minimal long-term commitment risk—but his 2025-26 production (4.8 PPG, 2.6 RPG, 0.8 APG across 68 games) and D+ performance grade reveal a player operating well below the offensive threshold needed to justify even modest rotation minutes, let alone playoff relevance. The one-year, near-minimum construction signals Houston's front office positioned him as a defensive reserve from inception, and the recent headlines confirming his role contraction validate that conservative read. As an established veteran at age 27 in his eighth season, Okogie lacks either the upside arc or the proven two-way impact that would justify CVI appreciation; his hard-nosed defensive intensity and energy play are roster staples, not rare commodities in the modern NBA. Media sentiment has cooled considerably from early-season optimism to a C-, reflecting the reality that a 4.8-point bench piece struggles to carve meaningful postseason minutes on a competitive 52-30 roster six days from the Finals—the contract is prudent, but the production and role compression leave no margin for error heading into next year's negotiations.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where Josh's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Josh Okogie ranks 90th of 147 graded shooting guards by performance. That slots Josh between A.J. Lawson (D+) just ahead and Amir Coffey (D+) just behind.
Graded higher
A.J. LawsonToronto RaptorsD+Andre Jackson Jr.Milwaukee BucksD+Dalen TerryPhiladelphia SixersD+Graded lower
Amir CoffeyPhoenix SunsAuto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Josh Okogie is a player in his 7th NBA season listed at SG for the Houston Rockets. FanVerdicts covers every NBA player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Josh Okogie, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C+, Performance D+, Sentiment C-.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NBA game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NBA hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NBA player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 0.9 |
| 0.2 |
| 43.2% |
| 39.9% |
| 57.4% |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 40 | 7.1 | 2.8 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 44.3% | 34.8% | 74.1% |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 4 | 3.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 55.6% | 33.3% | 50.0% |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 10 | 4.1 | 2.1 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 37.8% | 14.3% | 84.6% |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 2020-21 | ![]() | 59 | 5.4 | 2.6 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 40.2% | 26.9% | 76.9% |
| 2019-20 | ![]() | 62 | 8.6 | 4.3 | 1.6 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 42.7% | 26.6% | 79.6% |
| 2018-19 | ![]() | 74 | 7.7 | 2.9 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 38.6% | 27.9% | 72.8% |
| 3 |
| 2 |
| 1 |
| 0 |
| 3-6 |
| 1-4 |
| +3 |
| Mon, 4/27 | vs LAL | W 115-96 | 19 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2-5 | 1-2 | +20 |
| Sat, 4/25 | vs LAL | L 108-112 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | -13 |
| Wed, 4/22 | @ LAL | L 94-101 | 24 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3-6 | 1-3 | -4 |
| Sun, 4/19 | @ LAL | L 98-107 | 26 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2-4 | 1-2 | -10 |
| Mon, 4/13 | vs MEM | W 132-101 | 22 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1-6 | 1-3 | +21 |
| Sat, 4/11 | vs MIN | L 132-136 | 27 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0-3 | 0-3 | +1 |
| Fri, 4/10 | vs PHI | W 113-102 | 21 | 9 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4-8 | 1-2 | +4 |
| Wed, 4/8 | @ PHX | W 119-105 | 12 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0-3 | 0-2 | -5 |
Josh Okogie earns a D+ Performance grade, indicating below-average production relative to other NBA shooting guards this season. Through 483 games, Josh is contributing 4.8 points, 2.6 rebounds, and 0.8 assists per game in his role. Josh's best relative area is FG% at 43.2, though it still falls below the shooting guard median of 46.0. The biggest area for growth is APG at 0.8 (shooting guard median: 4.0). Among 147 NBA shooting guards graded this season, Josh ranks 90th.
Coverage volume around Josh Okogie produces a C- sentiment grade in the current window. The narrative driving that grade is fundamentally about role compression: media framed him entering the season as a defensive specialist on a modest one-year deal, a contract structure that immediately signaled depth rather than rotation fixture, and recent headlines confirm his role has contracted as the Rockets' roster has deepened—a story line that directly undermines any optimistic "glue guy" positioning from early-season coverage. His performance aligns uncomfortably with that shrinking role: the 2025-26 season shows 4.8 PPG, 2.6 RPG, and 0.8 APG across 68 games, counting stats that confirm he operates in situational, defensive-only territory rather than as a meaningful offensive contributor. One outlier analyst has characterized him as a "key piece" following his free-agent arrival, but that positive framing has clearly lost traction—the overall sentiment trend has cooled from an initial A-level reception down to C-, a substantial downgrade that reflects the reality of a shrinking role on an increasingly competitive roster. With Houston now sitting at 52-30 as the five-seed heading into playoff basketball, the question of whether a 4.8-point bench piece belongs in a meaningful postseason rotation has become harder for media to ignore, and that pressure is what keeps Okogie in uncomfortable middle territory—respected for his defensive effort, but with a role and production profile that gives neither fans nor analysts much to defend.
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.