
#32PF · Houston Rockets
Height
6'8"
Weight
235 lbs
Age
39
College
Georgetown
Experience
17 yrs
Wingspan
7'1.3"
Reach
8'7.0"
Grade Jeff Green
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Jeff Green grades out as a middling PF for Houston Rockets (C- Impact). That places him 43rd of 84 graded power forwards. In his on-court role, the grade is middling (C+ Role), reflecting how he produces relative to others at his position. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at C, fairly priced. The public read is very positive (A- Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score. With 17+ seasons of track record, these grades rest on a deep sample.
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 1243 | 2.3 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 40.7% | 33.8% | 80.4% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 26 | 2.3 | 0.7 | 0.2 |
| Season | Team | GP | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 26 | 2.3 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 40.7% | F F |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 3 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 33.3% | F F |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 78 | 6.5 | 2.3 | 0.9 | 45.6% | F F |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 20 | 4.1 | 1.6 | 0.7 | 45.2% | F F |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 5 | 3.8 | 3.6 | 0.4 | 35.3% | D- D- |
| 2020-21 | ![]() | 6 | 8.2 | 2.8 | 1.7 | 48.5% | D D |
| 2019-20 | ![]() | 12 | 11.6 | 5.0 | 1.6 | 49.5% | C C |
| 2018-19 | ![]() | 77 | 12.3 | 4.0 | 1.8 | 47.5% | C- C- |
| 2017-18 | ![]() | 22 | 7.7 | 2.4 | 1.5 | 40.8% | D- D- |
| 2016-17 | ![]() | 69 | 9.2 | 3.1 | 1.2 | 39.4% | D- D- |
| 2015-16 | ![]() | 6 | 10.2 | 3.2 | 0.7 | 45.7% | D+ D+ |
| 2014-15 | ![]() | 11 | 8.9 | 4.7 | 1.7 | 33.3% | D D |
| 2013-14 | ![]() | 82 | 16.9 | 4.6 | 1.7 | 41.2% | C+ C+ |
| 2012-13 | ![]() | 6 | 20.3 | 5.3 | 2.3 | 43.5% | C+ C+ |
| 2010-11 | ![]() | 9 | 7.3 | 2.7 | 0.2 | 43.4% | D- D- |
| 2009-10 | ![]() | 6 | 11.8 | 4.7 | 1.7 | 32.9% | C- C- |
| 2008-09 | ![]() | 78 | 16.5 | 6.7 | 2.0 | 44.6% | B- B- |
| 2007-08 | ![]() | 80 | 10.5 | 4.7 | 1.5 | 42.7% | C- C- |
Grades reflect the player's performance in each season. Header grade shows the current season.
| Date | OPP | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG | 3PT | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon, 4/27 | vs LAL | W 115-96 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | -4 |
| Sat, 4/25 | vs LAL | L 108-112 | 8 | 0 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$2.3M
Guaranteed
$2.3M
AAV
$2.3M/yr
Production versus salary tier earns Jeff Green a C Contract Value Index in the NBA market. At $2.3M AAV on a one-year deal, Green occupies that precarious zone where veteran-minimum compensation meets genuinely diminished on-court utility—his 2025-26 season stats of 2.3 PPG and 0.7 RPG across 26 games reflect a role player whose counting production has compressed into the replacement-level range, even as his locker-room standing remains elite. The contract itself is defensible: a one-year, sub-$2.3M commitment to a longtime veteran carries minimal cap risk and allows the Rockets flexibility, but the CVI downgrade from A+ to C over the past month acknowledges a hard truth that sentiment scores obscure—a respected journeyman's intangible value, however real, cannot offset the reality that his on-court availability and statistical contribution are now minimal. At 39 years old and 18 seasons into his career, Green has transcended the typical aging arc by virtue of professionalism and durability, yet even a player of his historical standing cannot paper over the gap between media appreciation (A- sentiment, Teammate of the Year finalist recognition) and actual playing-time opportunity as Houston prioritizes younger talent with a championship window at hand. The one-year structure means zero long-term cap liability, but it also means no runway to rebuild value—every playoff minute not logged or statistical contribution not made further crystallizes that this is a farewell tour for a beloved veteran, not a functional rotation piece. Green's contract works because it costs almost nothing; the tension lies in whether almost-nothing compensation adequately prices a player who is, for the first time in his career, almost nothing on the court.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where Jeff's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Jeff Green ranks 43rd of 84 graded power forwards by performance. That slots Jeff between Harrison Barnes (D+) just ahead and Draymond Green (D+) just behind.
Graded higher
Harrison BarnesSan Antonio SpursD+Joan BeringerMinnesota TimberwolvesD+Kevin LoveUtah JazzD+Graded lower
Draymond GreenGolden State WarriorsNo transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Jeff Green is a veteran in his 17th NBA season listed at PF for the Houston Rockets. FanVerdicts covers every NBA player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Jeff Green, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C, Performance D+, Sentiment A-.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NBA game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NBA hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NBA player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 0.0 |
| 0.0 |
| 40.7% |
| 32.4% |
| 100.0% |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 3 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 33.3% | 100.0% | 0.0% |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 78 | 6.5 | 2.3 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 45.6% | 33.1% | 81.9% |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 20 | 4.1 | 1.6 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 45.2% | 32.1% | 89.5% |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 5 | 3.8 | 3.6 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 35.3% | 37.5% | 80.0% |
| 2020-21 | ![]() | 6 | 8.2 | 2.8 | 1.7 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 48.5% | 55.6% | 87.5% |
| 2019-20 | ![]() | 12 | 11.6 | 5.0 | 1.6 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 49.5% | 42.6% | 82.4% |
| 2018-19 | ![]() | 77 | 12.3 | 4.0 | 1.8 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 47.5% | 34.7% | 88.8% |
| 2017-18 | ![]() | 22 | 7.7 | 2.4 | 1.5 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 40.8% | 30.0% | 71.7% |
| 2016-17 | ![]() | 69 | 9.2 | 3.1 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 39.4% | 27.5% | 86.3% |
| 2015-16 | ![]() | 6 | 10.2 | 3.2 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 45.7% | 40.0% | 60.0% |
| 2014-15 | ![]() | 11 | 8.9 | 4.7 | 1.7 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 33.3% | 22.2% | 84.6% |
| 2013-14 | ![]() | 82 | 16.9 | 4.6 | 1.7 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 41.2% | 34.1% | 79.5% |
| 2012-13 | ![]() | 6 | 20.3 | 5.3 | 2.3 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 43.5% | 45.5% | 84.4% |
| 2010-11 | ![]() | 9 | 7.3 | 2.7 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 43.4% | 43.8% | 72.2% |
| 2009-10 | ![]() | 6 | 11.8 | 4.7 | 1.7 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 32.9% | 29.6% | 85.0% |
| 2008-09 | ![]() | 78 | 16.5 | 6.7 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 44.6% | 38.9% | 78.8% |
| 2007-08 | ![]() | 80 | 10.5 | 4.7 | 1.5 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 42.7% | 27.6% | 74.4% |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0-2 |
| 0-1 |
| -4 |
| Mon, 4/13 | vs MEM | W 132-101 | 24 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2-8 | 0-4 | +7 |
| Wed, 4/8 | @ PHX | W 119-105 | -- | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0 |
Jeff Green earns a D+ Performance grade, indicating below-average production relative to other NBA power forwards this season. Through 1243 games, Jeff is contributing 2.3 points, 0.7 rebounds, and 0.2 assists per game in his role. Jeff's best relative area is FG% at 40.7, though it still falls below the power forward median of 46.0. The biggest area for growth is APG at 0.2 (power forward median: 4.0). Among 84 NBA power forwards graded this season, Jeff ranks 43rd.
How the public sees Jeff Green shakes out to a A- sentiment grade in the rolling 14-day window. The narrative surrounding Green has solidified around genuine respect for his 18 seasons of professional longevity and his status as the second-best journeyman in NBA history—a formal designation that carries real weight across media and fan circles. His public commitment to retire in Houston and suit up for at least two more seasons has resonated as a team-first declaration that plays especially well on a young, ascending Rockets roster, positioning him as a stabilizing locker-room presence rather than a ring-chasing mercenary. That warm framing coexists uncomfortably with his 2025-26 production—2.3 PPG and 0.7 RPG across 26 games—and his recent retreat to the bench as the Rockets (52-30, #5 seed) prioritize younger talent with the NBA Finals 11 days away, which quietly reinforces that his on-court relevance is waning despite the affection directed at his character. The sentiment trend cooling from B to C over the last 30 days reflects that fundamental tension: a beloved veteran's earned respect is running headlong into diminishing opportunity, and without a meaningful uptick in playoff minutes, the narrative will likely continue drifting downward as the postseason deepens. Nothing about his situation feels contentious—no character criticism, no controversy—but the cooling sentiment accurately captures the reality that even the most respected journeyman becomes harder to celebrate when a franchise is fighting for its title window.
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.