
#23SF · Oklahoma City Thunder
Height
6'6"
Weight
230 lbs
Age
24
College
Northwestern
Draft
2025, Rd 2, #14
Experience
0 yrs
Grade Brooks Barnhizer
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Brooks Barnhizer grades out as a middling SF for Oklahoma City Thunder (C+ Impact). That places him 102nd of 119 graded small forwards. In his on-court role, the grade is shaky (D+ Role), reflecting how he produces relative to others at his position. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at C-, fairly priced. The public read is sharply negative (F Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score. As a prospect, expect these grades to move quickly as a real sample builds.
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 35 | 1.3 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 38.0% | 29.4% | 66.7% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 36 | 1.3 | 1.8 | 0.5 |
| Season | Team | GP | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 36 | 1.3 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 38.0% | D- D- |
Grades reflect the player's performance in each season. Header grade shows the current season.
Brooks Barnhizer earns a D- Performance grade, indicating below-average production relative to other NBA small forwards this season. Through 35 games, Brooks is contributing 1.3 points, 1.8 rebounds, and 0.5 assists per game in his role. Brooks's best relative area is FG% at 38.0, though it still falls below the small forward median of 46.0. The biggest area for growth is PPG at 1.3 (small forward median: 15.0). Among 119 NBA small forwards graded this season, Brooks ranks 102nd. At 24, Brooks is still developing. The production should improve as he gains experience and a larger role with the Oklahoma City Thunder.
Barnhizer is a drafted prospect with developmental potential but struggling early production. Media focuses on skill gaps, particularly jump shooting, limiting immediate NBA viability. OKC's investment suggests front office confidence in long-term trajectory and raw tools. Current C- performance and low efficiency metrics create legitimate concerns about NBA fit. Rookie status provides patience, but he must improve significantly to secure rotation minutes.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where Brooks's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Brooks Barnhizer ranks 102nd of 119 graded small forwards by performance. That slots Brooks between MarJon Beauchamp (D-) just ahead and Harrison Ingram (D-) just behind.
Graded higher
MarJon BeauchampPhiladelphia SixersD-Will RileyWashington WizardsD-Khris MiddletonDallas MavericksD-Graded lower
Harrison IngramNo transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Brooks Barnhizer is a player on a rookie-scale contract listed at SF for the Oklahoma City Thunder. FanVerdicts covers every NBA player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Brooks Barnhizer, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C-, Performance D-, Sentiment F.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NBA game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NBA hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NBA player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 0.2 |
| 0.1 |
| 38.0% |
| 29.4% |
| 66.7% |
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.