
#20SG · Milwaukee Bucks
Height
6'4"
Weight
190 lbs
Age
26
College
Northern Iowa
Experience
3 yrs
Grade AJ Green
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, AJ Green grades out as a poor SG for Milwaukee Bucks (F Impact). That places him 145th of 147 graded shooting guards. In his on-court role, the grade is shaky (D+ Role), reflecting how he produces relative to others at his position. Against that production, his deal reads as a slight overpay on the Contract Value Index (D-) — the team is paying below what the play would command. The public read is positive (B+ Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 229 | 9.6 | 2.5 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 41.9% | 41.4% | 83.7% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 67 | 9.6 | 2.5 | 1.8 |
| Season | Team | GP | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 67 | 9.6 | 2.5 | 1.8 | 41.9% | D D |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 5 | 11.0 | 2.8 | 2.0 | 46.2% | D+ D+ |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 6 | 2.8 | 1.5 | 0.3 | 37.5% | D- D- |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 35 | 4.4 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 42.4% | D D |
Grades reflect the player's performance in each season. Header grade shows the current season.
| Date | OPP | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG | 3PT | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun, 4/12 | @ PHI | L 106-126 | 36 | 19 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 7-16 | 5-14 | -23 |
| Sat, 4/11 | vs BKN | W 125-108 | 41 | 35 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$2.3M
Guaranteed
$12.3M
AAV
$2.3M/yr
AJ Green drew a D- on the Contract Value Index — a measured outcome for Milwaukee's SG rotation. The grade reflects a fundamental mismatch: Green signed a four-year, $45 million extension ($11.25M AAV) on the strength of organizational optimism, but his 2025-26 production—9.6 PPG, 2.5 RPG, 1.8 APG across 67 games—marks him as a below-average contributor whose on-court impact falls well short of what that salary tier demands. For a fourth-year player at age 26, this is not a developmental arc bending upward; it's a roster depth piece locked into a mid-tier salary that should be reserved for proven complementary starters. The Bucks' faith in Green as a "reliable rotation piece" (per the extension narrative) has not translated to the court, creating a widening gap between his perceived role and his actual utility. That said, the contract's single-year window in the immediate term and Green's fringe three-and-D archetype mean Milwaukee hasn't crippled its flexibility—but the extension itself represents a misjudgment of his ceiling, rewarding organizational loyalty over demonstrated production at a price the team will feel for years to come.
AJ Green earns a F Performance grade, indicating below-average production relative to other NBA shooting guards this season. Through 229 games, AJ is contributing 9.6 points, 2.5 rebounds, and 1.8 assists per game in his role. AJ's best relative area is FG% at 41.9, though it still falls below the shooting guard median of 46.0. The biggest area for growth is APG at 1.8 (shooting guard median: 4.0). Among 147 NBA shooting guards graded this season, AJ ranks 145th.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the D band — a quick read on where AJ's contract sits relative to comparable money.
AJ Green ranks 145th of 147 graded shooting guards by performance. That slots AJ between Julian Strawther (F) just ahead and Rayan Rupert (F) just behind.
Graded higher
Julian StrawtherDenver NuggetsFGary Trent Jr.Milwaukee BucksFBen SheppardIndiana PacersFGraded lower
Rayan RupertMemphis GrizzliesNo transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
AJ Green is a player in his 3rd NBA season listed at SG for the Milwaukee Bucks. FanVerdicts covers every NBA player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on AJ Green, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index D-, Performance F, Sentiment B+.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NBA game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NBA hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NBA player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 0.5 |
| 0.1 |
| 41.9% |
| 40.8% |
| 80.4% |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 5 | 11.0 | 2.8 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 46.2% | 51.4% | 50.0% |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 6 | 2.8 | 1.5 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 37.5% | 18.2% | 100.0% |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 35 | 4.4 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 42.4% | 41.9% | 100.0% |
| 5 |
| 4 |
| 2 |
| 0 |
| 11-18 |
| 11-16 |
| +29 |
| Wed, 4/8 | @ DET | L 111-137 | 30 | 13 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4-9 | 4-8 | -18 |
| Tue, 4/7 | @ BKN | L 90-96 | 39 | 20 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6-13 | 6-12 | -4 |
| Sun, 4/5 | vs MEM | W 131-115 | 27 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2-7 | 2-7 | 0 |
| Sat, 4/4 | vs BOS | L 101-133 | 31 | 15 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 5-9 | 5-9 | -23 |
Around Milwaukee, the narrative on AJ Green reads as a B+ sentiment grade — measured by recent headlines and fan reactions. The story has been almost entirely shaped by his four-year, $45 million extension, which reframed him overnight from fringe rotation depth into a recognized building-block contributor in the Bucks' long-term plans, with media outlets amplifying the deal as a credible vote of confidence in his three-and-D profile. Yet there's a glaring disconnect between this optimistic public reception and what's actually happening on the court: Green's 2025-26 season shows 9.6 PPG, 2.5 RPG, 1.8 APG across 67 games, production that marks him as a below-average contributor by advanced metrics, far short of the solid complementary player the extension narrative implies. The Bucks' recent roster churn—cutting Cam Thomas and other depth pieces while re-signing Pete Nance—signals organizational comfort with Green as a stable known commodity, which sustains the positive sentiment despite the performance reality. The result is a fourth-year player earning $11.25M annually whose fan and media standing remains meaningfully more generous than his on-court impact justifies, creating a sentiment ceiling that holds even as the team's 32-50 record with 11 days until the Finals underscores just how much ground Milwaukee needs to make up.
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.