
RP · White Sox
Grade Trevor Richards
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Trevor Richards grades out as a middling RP for White Sox (C Performance). That places him 298th of 389 graded relief pitchers. The public read is very positive (A- Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | ERA | W-L | K | WHIP | IP | SV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 303 | 4.596076 | 24-28 | 629 | 1.3416041 | 0.0 | 2 |
| 2026 | ![]() | 2 | 2.08 | 0-0 | 5 | 1.62 | 4.1 | 0 |
| 2026 | ![]() | 10 | 6.08 |
Plate appearances and per-game impact line up to a C performance grade for Trevor Richards. As an established veteran in his ninth season, Richards is operating as a backend relief option — capable enough to hold down innings but without the stuff or track record to function as a high-leverage arm. His 2026 season production is minimal through early exposure: 5 strikeouts across 2 games with no decisions, the kind of limited counting stats you'd expect from a depth reliever in a part-time role. The White Sox are clearly viewing him as a speculative low-risk depth addition to stabilize their bullpen rotation rather than a transformative late-inning piece, and that aligns squarely with his C-grade performance tier — solid enough to eat innings and manage matchups without carrying the burden of high-stakes situations. What's most interesting about Richards is the disconnect between his modest on-field contribution and his surprisingly warm public perception: the A- sentiment grade reflects a narrative of quiet persistence and veteran reliability that has quietly outpaced the procedural roster noise surrounding his move, suggesting fans appreciate his understated ability to carve out big-league opportunities more than the transaction coverage ever indicated they would. With the regular season still stretching 107 days and the White Sox holding the #2 AL Central seed, Richards is unlikely to factor heavily in October plans, but he slots neatly into the kind of organizational depth that contenders rely on to weather injuries and fatigue down the stretch.
Trevor Richards ranks 298th of 389 graded relief pitchers by performance. That slots Trevor between Joey Cantillo (C) just ahead and Keegan Akin (C-) just behind.
Graded higher
Joey CantilloGuardiansCBrad LordNationalsCGrant AndersonBrewersCGraded lower
Keegan AkinOrioles| Date | OPP | Result | AB | H | R | HR | RBI | BB | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun, 6/7 | @ PHI | L 5-9 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |
| Fri, 6/5 | @ PHI | L 6-8 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Trevor Richards is a player on the White Sox roster listed at RP for the White Sox. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Trevor Richards, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Performance C, Sentiment A-.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 0-0 |
| 10 |
| 0.90 |
| 13.1 |
| 0 |
| 2026 | 12 | 5.09 | 0-0 | 15 | 1.08 | 17.2 | 0 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 3 | 12.00 | 0-0 | 2 | 3.00 | 3.0 | 0 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 2 | 3.38 | 0-0 | 3 | 1.50 | 2.2 | 0 |
| 2025 | 5 | 7.94 | 0-0 | 5 | 2.29 | 5.2 | 0 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 45 | 4.64 | 2-1 | 49 | 1.15 | 52.1 | 0 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 10 | 4.15 | 0-1 | 13 | 1.46 | 13.0 | 1 |
| 2024 | 55 | 4.55 | 2-2 | 62 | 1.21 | 65.1 | 1 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 56 | 4.95 | 2-1 | 105 | 1.35 | 72.2 | 0 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 62 | 5.34 | 3-2 | 82 | 1.44 | 64.0 | 0 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 6 | 4.50 | 0-0 | 16 | 1.00 | 12.0 | 1 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 15 | 3.20 | 3-0 | 25 | 1.22 | 19.2 | 0 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 32 | 3.31 | 4-2 | 37 | 0.80 | 32.2 | 0 |
| 2021 | 53 | 3.50 | 7-2 | 78 | 0.96 | 64.1 | 1 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 9 | 5.91 | 0-0 | 27 | 1.72 | 32.0 | 0 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 23 | 4.50 | 3-12 | 103 | 1.38 | 112.0 | 0 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 7 | 1.93 | 3-0 | 24 | 1.20 | 23.1 | 0 |
| 2019 | 30 | 4.06 | 6-12 | 127 | 1.35 | 135.1 | 0 |
| 2018 | ![]() | 25 | 4.42 | 4-9 | 130 | 1.39 | 126.1 | 0 |
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.
| Tue, 6/2 | @ MIN | L 4-6 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |
| Mon, 6/1 | @ MIN | L 6-9 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |
| Sat, 5/30 | vs DET | W 7-1 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |