
#7 1B · Reds
Height
5'9"
Weight
185 lbs
Age
28
College
N/A
Experience
4 yrs
Bats/Throws
R/R
Grade Spencer Steer
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Spencer Steer grades out as a middling 1B for Reds (C Performance). That places him 38th of 57 graded first basemen. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at C, fairly priced. The public read is negative (D+ Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | AVG | HR | RBI | OPS | SB | H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 538 | 0.24574083 | 73 | 279 | 0.7530204 | 50 | 476 |
| 2026 | ![]() | 59 | .278 | 9 | 23 | .817 | 3 | 58 |
| 2025 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$4.0M
Guaranteed
$2.4M
AAV
$4.0M/yr
Among first basemen on the Reds, Spencer Steer's output grades to a C performance level. The 28-year-old five-year veteran is delivering modest but meaningful contributions at the plate, posting a .278 average through 59 games in the 2026 season — a respectable batting line that reflects consistent contact skills in a limited sample. His power stroke remains a notable strength, evidenced by the nine home runs already on his ledger and the recent multihomer performance against Kansas City that drew direct organizational attention. The strikeout rate at 48 K in 59 games tells a different story, however, suggesting swing-and-miss vulnerabilities that cap his ceiling as a pure offensive force. Steer's role is solidly that of a dependable, fan-friendly contributor rather than a franchise cornerstone — the bobblehead promotion and local media coverage underscore his standing within the Cincinnati market as a player the organization values for defensive positioning and timely hitting, even as his broader national profile remains modest. With the Reds actively reshaping their roster through recent signings and acquisitions, Steer's exact alignment in the infield remains in flux, but his veteran presence and proven run-production capacity position him as a functional piece during the stretch run rather than a question mark requiring resolution.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where Spencer's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Spencer Steer ranks 38th of 57 graded first basemen by performance. That slots Spencer between Enrique Hernandez (C+) just ahead and Nick Sogard (C) just behind.
Graded higher
Enrique HernandezDodgersC+Rhys HoskinsGuardiansCCJ KayfusGuardiansCGraded lower
Nick SogardRed Sox| Date | OPP | Result | AB | H | R | HR | RBI | BB | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue, 6/16 | vs NYM | W 5-3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Mon, 6/15 | vs NYM | W 12-0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Spencer Steer is a player in his 4th MLB season listed at 1B for the Reds. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Spencer Steer, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C, Performance C, Sentiment D+.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
![]() |
| 146 |
| .238 |
| 21 |
| 75 |
| .723 |
| 7 |
| 121 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 158 | .225 | 20 | 92 | .721 | 25 | 129 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 156 | .271 | 23 | 86 | .820 | 15 | 158 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 28 | .211 | 2 | 8 | .632 | 0 | 20 |
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.
| Wed, 6/10 | @ SD | L 4-5 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Wed, 6/10 | @ SD | W 5-3 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Tue, 6/9 | @ SD | L 2-6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Sun, 6/7 | @ STL | L 3-5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Sat, 6/6 | @ STL | L 5-6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| Sat, 6/6 | @ STL | L 3-10 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Wed, 6/3 | vs KC | L 2-5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Tue, 6/2 | vs KC | W 4-3 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 |