
#40 RP · Angels
Height
6'1"
Weight
235 lbs
Age
26
College
Miami (OH)
Draft
2021, Rd 1, #9
Experience
2 yrs
Bats/Throws
R/R
Grade SAM Bachman
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, SAM Bachman grades out as an excellent RP for Angels (A+ Performance). That places him 18th of 389 graded relief pitchers. The public read is negative (D+ Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | ERA | W-L | K | WHIP | IP | SV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 52 | 3.8983958 | 3-5 | 57 | 1.3475937 | 0.0 | 1 |
| 2026 | ![]() | 21 | 2.22 | 1-0 | 29 | 1.09 | 28.1 | 0 |
| 2025 |
Length
1 year
AAV
$780K/yr
Sam Bachman's public perception sits in uncomfortable territory right now — a D+ sentiment grade for a player whose on-field production tells a dramatically different story. The media narrative, as it stands, frames him almost entirely through the lens of absence: a former ninth-overall pick in the 2021 draft who missed two years to injury and is now treated as a reclamation project rather than a legitimate bullpen weapon. Beat writers and the Angels organization have offered modest optimism out of spring training, but the coverage is notably bloodless — no breakout buzz, no urgency, just cautious acknowledgment that he appears healthy and refocused. The disconnect between that muted reception and his A performance grade is striking, suggesting the market simply hasn't updated its model on Bachman yet, still weighting the two-year absence more heavily than whatever he's actually doing on the mound. Meanwhile, the Angels have been aggressively shuffling their bullpen inventory — adding Kikuchi, Manoah, Saucedo, Sandlin, Lucchesi, and Joyce in rapid succession — which dilutes the organizational spotlight and makes it harder for Bachman's individual progress to cut through the noise. On a 15-23 club still searching for an identity, new arrivals tend to generate more column inches than a quietly resurgent internal candidate. The bottom line: Bachman's narrative is trending in the wrong direction despite production that warrants genuine attention, and until he logs sustained regular season results that force the conversation, the comeback-kid framing will keep his perception ceiling frustratingly low.
SAM Bachman ranks 18th of 389 graded relief pitchers by performance. That slots SAM between Austin Warren (A+) just ahead and Adrian Morejon (A) just behind.
Graded higher
Austin WarrenMetsA+Ron MarinaccioPadresA+Orion KerkeringPhilliesA+Graded lower
Adrian MorejonPadres| Date | OPP | Result | AB | H | R | HR | RBI | BB | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun, 6/14 | vs TB | L 3-8 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |
| Thu, 6/11 | vs HOU | W 3-2 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
SAM Bachman is a player in his 2nd MLB season listed at RP for the Angels. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on SAM Bachman, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Performance A+, Sentiment D+.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
![]() |
| 23 |
| 6.20 |
| 2-3 |
| 18 |
| 1.57 |
| 20.1 |
| 0 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 11 | 3.18 | 1-2 | 14 | 1.65 | 17.0 | 1 |
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.
| Tue, 6/9 | vs HOU | L 4-5 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |
| Sat, 6/6 | @ LAD | L 0-1 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |