
#5 RF · Padres
Height
5'9"
Weight
203 lbs
Age
31
College
Northeastern Oklahoma A&M (J.C.)
Draft
2014, Rd 16, #466
Experience
8 yrs
Bats/Throws
R/R
Grade Ramon Laureano
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Ramon Laureano grades out as an excellent RF for Padres (A Performance). That places him 12th of 74 graded right fielders. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at A+, a clear bargain. The public read is sharply negative (F Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | AVG | HR | RBI | OPS | SB | H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 788 | 0.25092387 | 111 | 347 | 0.7612066 | 77 | 679 |
| 2026 | ![]() | 53 | .203 | 7 | 21 | .660 | 7 | 37 |
| 2025 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$4.0M
Guaranteed
$2.4M
AAV
$4.0M/yr
Ramon Laureano delivers the kind of production that earns an A performance grade against MLB RF comps. His 2026 season stats of .203 AVG, 7 HR, and 65 K across 53 games paint a picture of a veteran swinging for impact — the home run total shows legitimate power, but the batting average and strikeout rate reveal a high-variance approach that won't generate consistent baseline value. The power stroke is his calling card here; seven homers in 53 games demonstrates the kind of pop that can anchor a corner-outfield contributor even when contact metrics lag. That said, the .203 average is a glaring weakness that limits his floor — it's a reminder that he's not a high-contact player, meaning his value is anchored almost entirely to walk rate, power, and defensive utility rather than hit-tool consistency. The media narrative has latched onto his clutch-hit moments and go-ahead doubles, framing him as a veteran capable of exceeding modest expectations, which aligns with this profile: he's a streaky, power-dependent bat in a lineup-dependent role rather than a cornerstone contributor. At 31 with nine seasons played, Laureano remains capable of meaningful offensive spikes, but that A-grade reflects current performance in a compressed sample — sustainability matters, especially as the Padres enter their mid-season stretch with playoff implications.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the A band — a quick read on where Ramon's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Ramon Laureano ranks 12th of 74 graded right fielders by performance. That slots Ramon between Kyle Tucker (A) just ahead and Daylen Lile (A-) just behind.
Graded higher
Kyle TuckerDodgersADylan CrewsNationalsAChase DeLauterGuardiansAGraded lower
Daylen LileNationalsAuto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Ramon Laureano is a veteran in his 8th MLB season listed at RF for the Padres. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Ramon Laureano, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index A+, Performance A, Sentiment F.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
![]() |
| 82 |
| .290 |
| 15 |
| 46 |
| .884 |
| 4 |
| 75 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 50 | .269 | 9 | 30 | .812 | 3 | 49 |
| 2025 | 132 | .281 | 24 | 76 | .854 | 7 | 124 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 31 | .143 | 1 | 4 | .494 | 3 | 10 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 67 | .296 | 10 | 29 | .832 | 5 | 64 |
| 2024 | 98 | .259 | 11 | 33 | .748 | 8 | 74 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 64 | .213 | 6 | 21 | .644 | 8 | 48 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 41 | .243 | 3 | 14 | .724 | 4 | 33 |
| 2023 | 105 | .224 | 9 | 35 | .675 | 12 | 81 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 94 | .211 | 13 | 34 | .663 | 11 | 73 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 88 | .246 | 14 | 39 | .760 | 12 | 84 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 54 | .213 | 6 | 25 | .704 | 2 | 39 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 123 | .288 | 24 | 67 | .861 | 13 | 125 |
| 2018 | ![]() | 48 | .288 | 5 | 19 | .832 | 7 | 45 |
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.