
#88 RP · Cubs
Height
6'2"
Weight
206 lbs
Age
33
College
Louisiana Tech
Draft
2015, Rd 20, #597
Experience
9 yrs
Bats/Throws
R/R
Grade Phil Maton
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Phil Maton grades out as an excellent RP for Cubs (A- Performance). That places him 53rd of 389 graded relief pitchers. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at A, a clear bargain. The public read is negative (D- Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | ERA | W-L | K | WHIP | IP | SV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 494 | 4.126799 | 23-21 | 557 | 1.2748457 | 0.0 | 10 |
| 2026 | ![]() | 22 | 7.11 | 0-1 | 22 | 1.74 | 19.0 | 0 |
| 2025 |
Length
2 years
Total Value
$14.5M
Guaranteed
$8.7M
AAV
$7.3M/yr
The A- performance grade on Phil Maton reflects elite-tier relief production alongside the realistic constraints of a 33-year-old depth arm in the second half of his career. His strikeout rate stands out as the core strength—22 K across 22 games in 2026 represents the kind of swing-and-miss consistency you want from a middle reliever tasked with high-leverage innings, and that velocity and command profile has clearly not eroded with age. The concerning element is the complete absence of wins on his ledger, which in the context of a bullpen role signals he's been deployed primarily in non-save situations, likely low-stakes innings or mop-up work rather than the tightest moments. That usage pattern aligns squarely with how the Cubs and media have framed him: a reliable innings-eater and depth piece filling voids left by injury, not a closer or setup man the organization trusts in championship moments. His standing as an established veteran with a decade of professional experience means he's exactly what his two-year extension promises—durability and professional competence—but the narrative gap between his A- performance and D- sentiment suggests the organization values his results more than the public has noticed, a disconnect that could narrow if he continues delivering when games matter most.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the A band — a quick read on where Phil's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Phil Maton ranks 53rd of 389 graded relief pitchers by performance. That slots Phil between Evan Sisk (A) just ahead and Ryan Helsley (A-) just behind.
Graded higher
Evan SiskPiratesAAlex VesiaDodgersAMatt StrahmRoyalsAGraded lower
Ryan HelsleyOrioles| Date | OPP | Result | AB | H | R | HR | RBI | BB | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed, 6/17 | vs COL | L 2-5 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |
| Tue, 6/16 | vs COL | W 5-4 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Phil Maton is a veteran in his 9th MLB season listed at RP for the Cubs. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Phil Maton, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index A, Performance A-, Sentiment D-.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
![]() |
| 40 |
| 2.35 |
| 1-3 |
| 48 |
| 1.12 |
| 38.1 |
| 2 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 23 | 3.52 | 3-2 | 33 | 0.96 | 23.0 | 3 |
| 2025 | 63 | 2.79 | 4-5 | 81 | 1.06 | 61.1 | 5 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 40 | 4.58 | 1-2 | 30 | 1.33 | 35.1 | 2 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 31 | 2.51 | 2-1 | 30 | 0.84 | 28.2 | 1 |
| 2024 | 71 | 3.66 | 3-3 | 60 | 1.11 | 64.0 | 3 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 68 | 3.00 | 4-3 | 74 | 1.12 | 66.0 | 1 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 67 | 3.84 | 0-2 | 73 | 1.25 | 65.2 | 0 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 38 | 4.57 | 2-0 | 61 | 1.35 | 41.1 | 0 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 27 | 4.97 | 4-0 | 24 | 1.62 | 25.1 | 0 |
| 2021 | 65 | 4.73 | 6-0 | 85 | 1.46 | 66.2 | 0 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 23 | 4.57 | 3-3 | 32 | 1.34 | 21.2 | 0 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 21 | 7.77 | 0-0 | 20 | 1.64 | 24.1 | 0 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 9 | 2.92 | 0-0 | 13 | 0.81 | 12.1 | 0 |
| 2019 | 30 | 6.14 | 0-0 | 33 | 1.36 | 36.2 | 0 |
| 2018 | ![]() | 45 | 4.37 | 0-2 | 55 | 1.54 | 47.1 | 0 |
| 2017 | ![]() | 46 | 4.19 | 3-2 | 46 | 1.28 | 43.0 | 1 |
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.
| Thu, 6/11 | @ COL | W 9-3 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |
| Thu, 6/11 | @ COL | L 2-3 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |
| Fri, 6/5 | vs SF | L 3-18 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |
| Sun, 5/31 | @ STL | L 1-5 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |
| Fri, 5/29 | @ STL | L 5-6 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |