
#58 RP · Yankees
Height
6'1"
Weight
196 lbs
Age
32
College
N/A
Draft
2012, Rd 1, #56
Experience
9 yrs
Bats/Throws
R/R
Grade Paul Blackburn
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Paul Blackburn grades out as a shaky RP for Yankees (D+ Performance). That places him 332nd of 389 graded relief pitchers. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at D, a slight overpay. The public read is mixed (C Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | ERA | W-L | K | WHIP | IP | SV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 115 | 4.909091 | 24-32 | 376 | 1.4169515 | 0.0 | 1 |
| 2026 | ![]() | 17 | 3.12 | 2-1 | 17 | 1.38 | 26.0 | 0 |
| 2025 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$2.0M
Guaranteed
$1.2M
AAV
$2.0M/yr
The D+ performance grade on Paul Blackburn reflects MVP-caliber peaks alongside cooler stretches. At 32 years old with a decade of professional experience, Blackburn sits solidly in the established-veteran tier—a depth reliever whose on-field production this season hasn't yet justified the optimistic narrative surrounding his re-signing, even accounting for the modest financial commitment. His 2026 season shows 2 wins and 17 strikeouts across 17 games, demonstrating consistent availability but underwhelming volume; the strikeout rate alone signals he's functioning as a low-leverage depth arm rather than a high-velocity shutdown option in pinch moments. The disconnect between sentiment (a cautiously optimistic B) and performance (D+) reflects the reality that media and fans are pricing in organizational confidence and the low-risk profile of a $2M deal, not actual results on the mound. For a Yankees roster sitting 41-26 and positioned as a win-now operation, Blackburn's role is complementary and situational—eat innings when the heavy hitters aren't needed, provide stability without demanding premium touches. His tenure with the club hinges entirely on whether those modest contributions continue; a veteran arm operating at this performance level remains expendable if higher-impact options emerge as the regular season winds toward its final stretch with 107 days remaining.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the D band — a quick read on where Paul's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Paul Blackburn ranks 332nd of 389 graded relief pitchers by performance. That slots Paul between Brandon Eisert (C-) just ahead and Carson Seymour (D+) just behind.
Graded higher
Brandon EisertWhite SoxC-Joel KuhnelBrewersC-Jonathan LoaisigaDiamondbacksC-Graded lower
Carson Seymour| Date | OPP | Result | AB | H | R | HR | RBI | BB | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue, 6/9 | @ CLE | W 3-2 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |
| Mon, 6/8 | @ CLE | W 7-5 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Paul Blackburn is a veteran in his 9th MLB season listed at RP for the Yankees. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Paul Blackburn, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index D, Performance D+, Sentiment C.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
![]() |
| 7 |
| 6.85 |
| 0-3 |
| 18 |
| 1.65 |
| 23.2 |
| 1 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 8 | 5.28 | 0-0 | 16 | 1.30 | 15.1 | 0 |
| 2025 | 15 | 6.23 | 0-3 | 34 | 1.51 | 39.0 | 1 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 9 | 4.41 | 4-2 | 38 | 1.16 | 51.0 | 0 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 5 | 5.18 | 1-2 | 21 | 1.56 | 24.1 | 0 |
| 2024 | 14 | 4.66 | 5-4 | 59 | 1.29 | 75.1 | 0 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 21 | 4.43 | 4-7 | 104 | 1.54 | 103.2 | 0 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 21 | 4.28 | 7-6 | 89 | 1.26 | 111.1 | 0 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 9 | 5.87 | 1-4 | 26 | 1.62 | 38.1 | 0 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 1 | 27.00 | 0-1 | 2 | 3.00 | 2.1 | 0 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 4 | 10.64 | 0-2 | 8 | 2.09 | 11.0 | 0 |
| 2018 | ![]() | 6 | 7.16 | 2-3 | 19 | 1.41 | 27.2 | 0 |
| 2017 | ![]() | 10 | 3.22 | 3-1 | 22 | 1.26 | 58.2 | 0 |
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.
| Fri, 6/5 | vs BOS | L 3-5 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |
| Wed, 6/3 | vs CLE | L 4-5 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |