
3B · Angels
Grade Nick Madrigal
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Nick Madrigal grades out as a strong 3B for Angels (B- Performance). That places him 32nd of 72 graded third basemen. The public read is negative (D- Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | AVG | HR | RBI | OPS | SB | H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 285 | 0.27419356 | 4 | 77 | 0.6674314 | 17 | 238 |
| 2026 | ![]() | 6 | .400 | 0 | 1 | .838 | 0 | 6 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 51 | .221 | 0 |
Per-game impact for Nick Madrigal pencils out to a B- performance grade. The 2026 season stats reveal elite contact skills—a .400 average across 6 games marks precisely the kind of hitting discipline that has defined his profile as a 6-year veteran—but the complete absence of power (0 home runs) and minimal plate appearances (1 strikeout in limited opportunities) underscore why his impact remains capped at a solid-starter tier rather than above-average production. His primary strength is pure hit-tool consistency; his critical weakness is the inability to drive the ball or generate slugging value that modern lineups demand. At this point in the season, Madrigal operates in a depth role with sparse playing time, cycling through the Angels roster as organizational insurance rather than a cornerstone piece. The mediaFraming makes clear that repeated minor-league assignments and contract selections have positioned him as a fungible depth option in a crowded infield, and with the Angels sitting at 25-41 in mid-season, the low expectations surrounding meaningful playing time reflect a broader organizational reality: Madrigal remains a useful but replaceable contributor, unlikely to shift the needle on a struggling roster unless injuries force extended opportunity.
Inside the Angels ecosystem, the take on Nick Madrigal settles at a D- sentiment grade. Media coverage has consistently framed him as a transactional depth piece rather than a meaningful contributor to the club's competitive outlook—a contact-oriented infielder whose limited power and lack of accolades have never positioned him as a roster cornerstone, and the repeated cycle of minor-league assignments, IL call-ups, and contract selections only reinforces that narrative of organizational fungibility. The Angels' recent signing spree at multiple positions (Lugo, Lowe, Joyce, Rodriguez, Saucedo, Martinez across late May) compounds the perception that Madrigal occupies a crowded, uncertain niche in the infield, with little guarantee of meaningful playing time as the team continues to shuffle roster spots. Headlines centered on his designations, IL stints, and contract selections paint a picture of cautious indifference rather than genuine excitement—the kind of coverage reserved for useful but replaceable organizational options. Unless Madrigal seizes a starting role through injury or a breakout spring, the prevailing fan and media sentiment is one of low expectations heading into a 2026 season where the Angels (21-35, #15 AL seed) have shown no hesitation about cycling through depth options to address roster needs.
Nick Madrigal ranks 32nd of 72 graded third basemen by performance. That slots Nick between MAX Schuemann (B-) just ahead and Ronny Mauricio (B-) just behind.
Graded higher
MAX SchuemannYankeesB-Sung-mun SongPadresB-Zack ShortMetsB-Graded lower
Ronny MauricioMets| Date | OPP | Result | AB | H | R | HR | RBI | BB | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed, 6/17 | @ ARI | W 7-0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Sun, 6/14 | vs TB | L 3-8 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Nick Madrigal is a player on the Angels roster listed at 3B for the Angels. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Nick Madrigal, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Performance B-, Sentiment D-.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 10 |
| .536 |
| 1 |
| 19 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 92 | .263 | 2 | 28 | .663 | 10 | 71 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 59 | .249 | 0 | 7 | .587 | 3 | 52 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 54 | .305 | 2 | 21 | .774 | 1 | 61 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 29 | .340 | 0 | 11 | .745 | 2 | 35 |
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.
| Thu, 6/11 | vs HOU | W 3-2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tue, 6/9 | vs HOU | L 4-5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Sun, 6/7 | @ LAD | L 2-9 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat, 6/6 | @ LAD | L 0-1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Thu, 6/4 | vs COL | W 11-4 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Wed, 6/3 | vs COL | L 2-8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tue, 6/2 | vs COL | L 8-9 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |