
#18 RF · Braves
Height
5'10"
Weight
180 lbs
Age
35
College
Vanderbilt
Draft
2013, Rd 14, #429
Experience
7 yrs
Bats/Throws
L/L
Grade Mike Yastrzemski
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Mike Yastrzemski grades out as a strong RF for Braves (B Performance). That places him 34th of 74 graded right fielders. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at B-, good value. The public read is negative (D Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | AVG | HR | RBI | OPS | SB | H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | ![]() | 57 | .245 | 3 | 17 | .702 | 1 | 38 |
| 2025 |
Length
2 years
Total Value
$23.0M
Guaranteed
$13.8M
AAV
$11.5M/yr
Mike Yastrzemski's on-field production earns a B performance grade against RF peers across MLB. The 35-year-old established veteran is delivering solid, above-average contributions in his first season with Atlanta, though the numbers reveal a player operating at a measured, rather than explosive, level — his 2026 season stats show a .245 AVG with 3 HR across 57 games, a modest but functional offensive profile for a depth piece in a win-now window. His strikeout rate of 40 K in limited at-bats points to an approach that prioritizes contact and consistency over power, a trait typical of veteran role players tasked with providing professional at-bats rather than carrying an offense. With 57 games played, Yastrzemski has logged meaningful bench and part-time outfield reps, the kind of durability the Braves clearly factored into their two-year extension calculus heading into the spring. The constructive media narrative around him — built on a strong Spring Training and organizational confidence in his fit — aligns cleanly with this B-tier assessment: he's exactly what an established contender should want in a veteran complementary bat, proven enough to trust but realistic enough not to mistake for a lineup lynchpin. At 35 and eight seasons into his career, Yastrzemski remains a low-risk addition to a Braves team currently sitting atop the NL East, the kind of professional depth move that doesn't generate headlines but quietly anchors playoff-adjacent rosters.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the B band — a quick read on where Mike's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Mike Yastrzemski ranks 34th of 74 graded right fielders by performance. That slots Mike between Troy Johnston (B) just ahead and Will Brennan (B) just behind.
Graded higher
Troy JohnstonRockiesBBrent RookerAthleticsBStuart FairchildGuardiansBGraded lower
Will BrennanGiants| Date | OPP | Result | AB | H | R | HR | RBI | BB | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun, 6/14 | @ NYM | L 1-8 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Sat, 6/6 | vs PIT | W 6-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Mike Yastrzemski is a player in his 7th MLB season listed at RF for the Braves. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Mike Yastrzemski, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index B-, Performance B, Sentiment D.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.

| 97 |
| .231 |
| 8 |
| 28 |
| .685 |
| 6 |
| 74 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 50 | .237 | 9 | 18 | .839 | 1 | 37 |
| 2025 | 147 | .233 | 17 | 46 | .736 | 7 | 111 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 140 | .231 | 18 | 57 | .739 | 3 | 99 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 106 | .233 | 15 | 43 | .775 | 2 | 77 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 148 | .214 | 17 | 57 | .697 | 5 | 104 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 139 | .224 | 25 | 71 | .768 | 4 | 105 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 54 | .297 | 10 | 35 | .968 | 2 | 57 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 107 | .272 | 21 | 55 | .852 | 2 | 101 |
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.
| Fri, 6/5 | vs PIT | W 6-3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Thu, 6/4 | vs TOR | L 2-7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Wed, 6/3 | vs TOR | W 7-3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tue, 6/2 | vs TOR | W 4-3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Sun, 5/31 | @ CIN | L 4-6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat, 5/30 | @ CIN | W 5-2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Fri, 5/29 | @ CIN | W 8-3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Thu, 5/28 | @ BOS | W 10-2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |