
#26 3B · Giants
Height
6'1"
Weight
220 lbs
Age
33
College
Cal State Fullerton
Draft
2014, Rd 1, #25
Experience
10 yrs
Bats/Throws
R/R
Grade Matt Chapman
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Matt Chapman grades out as a strong 3B for Giants (B- Performance). That places him 36th of 72 graded third basemen. The contract is harder to defend: the Contract Value Index calls it a slight overpay (D), with the cost outrunning the output. The public read is mixed (C- Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score. With 10+ seasons of track record, these grades rest on a deep sample.
| Year | Team | GP | AVG | HR | RBI | OPS | SB | H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 1221 | 0.24141824 | 210 | 604 | 0.7865422 | 35 | 1069 |
| 2026 | ![]() | 71 | .261 | 7 | 39 | .762 | 0 | 68 |
| 2025 |
Length
6 years
Total Value
$151.0M
Guaranteed
$90.6M
AAV
$25.2M/yr
Above-replacement production at the 3B pay band earns Matt Chapman a D Contract Value Index. At 33 years old in the established veteran phase of his career, Chapman carries a $25.2M average annual salary across a six-year deal that increasingly looks misaligned with both his age curve and the Giants' organizational direction. His B- performance grade reflects the continued defensive excellence—five Gold Glove awards, most recently in 2024—and legitimate offensive contributions that justify a premium third baseman's baseline, yet that on-field value is being systematically undercut by context: the team is actively shopping its high-priced core at the trade deadline, Chapman was visibly surprised by recent roster moves signaling uncertainty about his long-term fit, and the prevailing media narrative has shifted decisively from celebrating his Gold Glove defense to framing his salary as part of San Francisco's larger financial problem. The CVI grade reflects the fundamental tension between what Chapman produces and what the Giants are paying him relative to their current competitive standing—a mid-season rebuild-in-progress roster with limited margin for albatross contracts. With four years of obligation remaining on this deal, the Giants have created a scenario where a still-competent veteran defender becomes a liability in a cost-cutting environment, a cautionary tale in how acquisition timing and organizational trajectory misalignment can erode even elite-defender value.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the D band — a quick read on where Matt's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Matt Chapman ranks 36th of 72 graded third basemen by performance. That slots Matt between Caleb Durbin (B-) just ahead and Addison Barger (C+) just behind.
Graded higher
Caleb DurbinRed SoxB-Tyler BlackBrewersB-Ronny MauricioMetsB-Graded lower
Addison BargerBlue Jays| Date | OPP | Result | AB | H | R | HR | RBI | BB | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed, 6/10 | vs WAS | W 11-10 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Wed, 6/10 | vs WAS | L 3-6 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Matt Chapman is a veteran in his 10th MLB season listed at 3B for the Giants. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Matt Chapman, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index D, Performance B-, Sentiment C-.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
![]() |
| 128 |
| .231 |
| 21 |
| 61 |
| .770 |
| 9 |
| 105 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 154 | .247 | 27 | 78 | .791 | 15 | 142 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 140 | .240 | 17 | 54 | .754 | 4 | 122 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 155 | .229 | 27 | 76 | .757 | 2 | 123 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 151 | .210 | 27 | 72 | .717 | 3 | 111 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 37 | .232 | 10 | 25 | .811 | 0 | 33 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 156 | .249 | 36 | 91 | .848 | 1 | 145 |
| 2018 | ![]() | 145 | .278 | 24 | 68 | .864 | 1 | 152 |
| 2017 | ![]() | 84 | .234 | 14 | 40 | .785 | 0 | 68 |
The MLB media tone on Matt Chapman pencils out to a C- sentiment grade after weighing recent storylines. The prevailing narrative has shifted away from celebrating his Gold Glove defense—he's won the award five times, most recently in 2024—and toward a story of financial friction and organizational uncertainty. Chapman remains a respected defensive presence at third base with legitimate offensive contributions, as evidenced by moments like his key RBI walk, yet the clubhouse environment has become the dominant frame; his visible surprise at the Patrick Bailey trade signaled a player navigating transition rather than stability. The Giants' $25.2M annual salary commitment to Chapman is now prominently cited as part of the organization's larger spending problem, with trade deadline rumors placing him squarely in the shopping cart despite his on-field B- performance grade. At 33 years old and mid-season on a struggling San Francisco roster (17-24, currently the #13 seed in the NL), Chapman's media standing has cooled considerably—the narrative is one of financial burden and unclear long-term fit rather than veteran anchor, tempering what would otherwise be a strongly positive perception for a player of his caliber.
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.
| Tue, 6/9 | vs WAS | L 3-4 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Mon, 6/8 | @ CHC | W 2-1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Sat, 6/6 | @ CHC | L 2-3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Fri, 6/5 | @ CHC | W 18-3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 1 |
| Thu, 6/4 | @ MIL | W 12-9 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Wed, 6/3 | @ MIL | W 1-0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Tue, 6/2 | @ MIL | L 3-8 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mon, 6/1 | @ MIL | L 2-16 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 |