
LF · Cardinals
Grade LaRs Nootbaar
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, LaRs Nootbaar grades out as a strong LF for Cardinals (B+ Performance). That places him 25th of 75 graded left fielders. The public read is mixed (C Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | AVG | HR | RBI | OPS | SB | H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 528 | 0.24229857 | 58 | 195 | 0.7475387 | 28 | 409 |
| 2026 | ![]() | 2 | .429 | 1 | 3 | 1.500 | 0 | 3 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 135 | .234 |
Among left fielders on the Cardinals, Lars Nootbaar's output grades to a B+ performance level. His 2026 season line of .429 AVG across 2 games represents a sharp, contact-heavy start following his activation from the 60-day injured list, signaling that his offensive stroke remains intact after the injury layoff. The obvious counterweight is the minuscule sample size—two games and a single strikeout cannot sustain a season-long grade—but the early trajectory and lack of whiffs suggest he's not pressing at the plate or showing rust from his absence. As a six-year veteran, Nootbaar's true value rests on his ability to stay available and contribute as a consistent, on-base-oriented outfielder rather than on short bursts of hot hitting; the Cardinals' recent outfield additions underscore that his role is stabilizing depth and defensive versatility, not carrying an offense. The media narrative frames him as a sympathetic, well-liked piece whose return generated genuine goodwill, and that consistency of character aligns with a B+ grade—productive enough to matter in a playoff push, but not a ceiling-raiser. His stretch-run performance will hinge entirely on maintaining availability through September's final sprint; if durability holds, he's a valuable complementary contributor to St. Louis's outfield rotation.
Lars Nootbaar's sentiment grade lands at C, reflecting how the recent storylines have framed him. The narrative around Nootbaar is anchored in cautious optimism rather than explosive enthusiasm—media coverage and fan reaction have been notably warm since his activation from the 60-day injured list, but the tone skews supportive and sympathetic rather than star-making. His immediate offensive contribution upon return, including a multi-hit, RBI performance in his debut game, reinforced perceptions of him as a reliable, health-permitting contributor whose value rests on consistency, defensive versatility, and clubhouse presence rather than marquee accolades. Recent headlines have emphasized both the practical roster boost his return provides and the intangible element of his presence—framing him as a valued piece whose absence created genuine appreciation among the fanbase. The Cardinals' recent roster activity, including moves across the outfield and pitching depth, positions Nootbaar as a stabilizing on-base threat in a lineup managing multiple injury transitions. The C-grade verdict captures this moment precisely: Nootbaar has goodwill, productive momentum, and job security, but his ceiling narrative will hinge entirely on whether he can maintain availability through the stretch run and sustain the offensive flashes that lit up his return.
LaRs Nootbaar ranks 25th of 75 graded left fielders by performance. That slots LaRs between Nick Loftin (B+) just ahead and Kyler Fedko (B+) just behind.
Graded higher
Nick LoftinRoyalsB+Randal GrichukWhite SoxB+Ian HappCubsB+Graded lower
Kyler FedkoTwins| Date | OPP | Result | AB | H | R | HR | RBI | BB | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue, 6/16 | vs SD | W 3-2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Mon, 6/15 | vs SD | W 3-0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
LaRs Nootbaar is a player on the Cardinals roster listed at LF for the Cardinals. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on LaRs Nootbaar, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Performance B+, Sentiment C.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 13 |
| 48 |
| .686 |
| 4 |
| 119 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 109 | .244 | 12 | 45 | .759 | 7 | 85 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 117 | .261 | 14 | 46 | .785 | 11 | 111 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 108 | .228 | 14 | 40 | .788 | 4 | 66 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 58 | .239 | 5 | 15 | .739 | 2 | 26 |
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.
| Thu, 6/11 | @ NYM | L 4-5 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Tue, 6/9 | @ NYM | W 7-0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Sun, 6/7 | vs CIN | W 5-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Sat, 6/6 | vs CIN | W 6-5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Sat, 6/6 | vs CIN | W 10-3 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |