
RP · Angels
Grade Kirby Yates
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Kirby Yates grades out as an excellent RP for Angels (A Performance). That places him 31st of 389 graded relief pitchers. The public read is negative (D+ Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | ERA | W-L | K | WHIP | IP | SV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 480 | 3.3652174 | 30-24 | 633 | 1.1326087 | 0.0 | 99 |
| 2026 | ![]() | 10 | 3.86 | 0-1 | 12 | 1.18 | 9.1 | 1 |
| 2025 |
Despite the Angels sitting at 15-23 and largely treading water in the American League West, Kirby Yates has quietly been one of the more compelling individual stories on this roster, earning a grade that places him among the elite performers at his position regardless of team context. His performance grade stands out as genuinely excellent for a reliever operating in what the media has framed as a measured, low-expectation situation — the kind of production that makes a one-year deal look like a front-office win in hindsight. The catch, of course, is availability: Yates is currently working through a rehab assignment that has been transferred to Triple-A, and without confirmed active-roster production, his elite grade reflects ceiling and recent performance rather than accumulated innings in 2026. The media narrative surrounding him has been explicitly transactional — coverage focuses on procedural rehab steps and roster logistics rather than genuine buzz — and that framing is hard to argue with given the unknowns still attached to his health timeline. His one-year deal was never constructed to be a marquee acquisition, and both the organization and the fanbase seem to understand that his value is tied almost entirely to whether he can stay on the mound consistently. Still, when a reliever of his durability and late-career resilience carries an A performance grade entering the stretch of a difficult season, the Angels have every incentive to be patient — a healthy Yates contributing out of that bullpen is one of the few genuine organizational bright spots worth monitoring here.
Kirby Yates ranks 31st of 389 graded relief pitchers by performance. That slots Kirby between Raisel Iglesias (A) just ahead and Tejay Antone (A) just behind.
Graded higher
Raisel IglesiasBravesAGabe SpeierMarinersAKenley JansenTigersAGraded lower
Tejay AntoneReds| Date | OPP | Result | AB | H | R | HR | RBI | BB | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed, 6/17 | @ ARI | W 7-0 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |
| Tue, 6/9 | vs HOU | L 4-5 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Kirby Yates is a player on the Angels roster listed at RP for the Angels. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Kirby Yates, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Performance A, Sentiment D+.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
![]() |
| 50 |
| 5.23 |
| 4-3 |
| 52 |
| 1.33 |
| 41.1 |
| 3 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 61 | 1.17 | 7-2 | 85 | 0.83 | 61.2 | 33 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 61 | 3.28 | 7-2 | 80 | 1.19 | 60.1 | 5 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 9 | 5.14 | 0-0 | 6 | 1.57 | 7.0 | 0 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 6 | 12.46 | 0-1 | 8 | 2.54 | 4.1 | 2 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 60 | 1.19 | 0-5 | 101 | 0.89 | 60.2 | 41 |
| 2018 | ![]() | 65 | 2.14 | 5-3 | 90 | 0.92 | 63.0 | 12 |
| 2017 | ![]() | 1 | 18.00 | 0-0 | 1 | 2.00 | 1.0 | 0 |
| 2017 | ![]() | 61 | 3.72 | 4-5 | 87 | 1.10 | 55.2 | 1 |
| 2017 | 62 | 3.97 | 4-5 | 88 | 1.11 | 56.2 | 1 |
| 2016 | ![]() | 41 | 5.23 | 2-1 | 50 | 1.45 | 41.1 | 0 |
| 2015 | ![]() | 20 | 7.97 | 1-0 | 21 | 1.48 | 20.1 | 0 |
| 2014 | ![]() | 37 | 3.75 | 0-2 | 42 | 1.33 | 36.0 | 1 |
The media and fan sentiment surrounding Kirby Yates reflects a decidedly lukewarm reception that earns him a D+ grade on the public perception scale. Coverage of the veteran reliever has been largely transactional, focusing on routine rehab assignments and procedural roster moves rather than generating any genuine excitement about his potential impact for the Angels. While the organization's decision to bring him back suggests internal confidence, the broader narrative frames Yates as a depth piece whose value hinges entirely on health rather than any compelling skillset or track record. Angels fans have responded with measured optimism at best, viewing him as a serviceable veteran whose 2026 contribution remains a complete unknown until he proves his durability on the mound. The lack of marquee appeal or significant media attention underscores a player whose reputation rests on past resilience rather than current expectations, leaving him in the forgettable middle tier of reliever signings.
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.
| Sat, 6/6 | @ LAD | L 0-1 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |
| Thu, 6/4 | vs COL | W 11-4 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |
| Tue, 6/2 | vs COL | L 8-9 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |