
#74 RP · Tigers
Height
6'5"
Weight
265 lbs
Age
38
College
N/A
Experience
16 yrs
Bats/Throws
B/R
Grade Kenley Jansen
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Kenley Jansen grades out as an excellent RP for Tigers (A Performance). That places him 27th of 389 graded relief pitchers. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at A-, a clear bargain. The public read is negative (D Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score. With 16+ seasons of track record, these grades rest on a deep sample.
| Year | Team | GP | ERA | W-L | K | WHIP | IP | SV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 951 | 2.6073577 | 55-43 | 1297 | 0.96568805 | 0.0 | 483 |
| 2026 | ![]() | 18 | 4.80 | 1-3 | 19 | 1.20 | 15.0 | 7 |
| 2025 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$11.0M
Guaranteed
$6.6M
AAV
$11.0M/yr
Per-game impact for Kenley Jansen pencils out to a A performance grade. At 38 years old with 17 seasons under his belt, Jansen remains an elite-tier closer despite the noise surrounding his durability—his 2026 season production of 19 strikeouts across 18 games demonstrates that the stuff is still legitimate even if the organizational landscape around him feels uncertain. The strikeout rate is his calling card; that's what separates a high-end reliever from a middling one, and Jansen is delivering there. The durability concern, however, is not theoretical—pelvic inflammation sidelined him mid-season, and at his age, any trip to the IL introduces legitimate questions about whether he can string together a full campaign without setbacks, especially with the Tigers sitting at 29-42 and viewing the stretch run as a stabilization project rather than a push. The gap between his actual on-field performance and the cautious media narrative reflects a franchise in organizational flux; Jansen is executing at an All-Star-caliber level, but the Tigers' recent flurry of roster moves and lack of clarity about their direction has overshadowed what should be a straightforward story about a veteran closer still getting outs when it matters. Until Detroit settles on whether it's building around its core or managing it, Jansen's elite performance will continue to be framed as a question mark rather than an asset.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the A band — a quick read on where Kenley's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Kenley Jansen ranks 27th of 389 graded relief pitchers by performance. That slots Kenley between Brooks Raley (A) just ahead and James Karinchak (A) just behind.
Graded higher
Brooks RaleyMetsAAdrian MorejonPadresATyler RogersBlue JaysAGraded lower
James KarinchakBravesAuto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Kenley Jansen is a veteran in his 16th MLB season listed at RP for the Tigers. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Kenley Jansen, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index A-, Performance A, Sentiment D.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
![]() |
| 62 |
| 2.59 |
| 5-4 |
| 57 |
| 0.95 |
| 59.0 |
| 29 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 54 | 3.29 | 4-2 | 62 | 1.06 | 54.2 | 27 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 51 | 3.63 | 3-6 | 52 | 1.28 | 44.2 | 29 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 65 | 3.38 | 5-2 | 85 | 1.05 | 64.0 | 41 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 69 | 2.22 | 4-4 | 86 | 1.04 | 69.0 | 38 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 27 | 3.33 | 3-1 | 33 | 1.15 | 24.1 | 11 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 62 | 3.71 | 5-3 | 80 | 1.06 | 63.0 | 33 |
| 2018 | ![]() | 69 | 3.01 | 1-5 | 82 | 0.99 | 71.2 | 38 |
| 2017 | ![]() | 65 | 1.32 | 5-0 | 109 | 0.75 | 68.1 | 41 |
| 2016 | ![]() | 71 | 1.83 | 3-2 | 104 | 0.67 | 68.2 | 47 |
| 2015 | ![]() | 54 | 2.41 | 2-1 | 80 | 0.78 | 52.1 | 36 |
| 2014 | ![]() | 68 | 2.76 | 2-3 | 101 | 1.13 | 65.1 | 44 |
| 2013 | ![]() | 75 | 1.88 | 4-3 | 111 | 0.86 | 76.2 | 28 |
| 2012 | ![]() | 65 | 2.35 | 5-3 | 99 | 0.85 | 65.0 | 25 |
| 2011 | ![]() | 51 | 2.85 | 2-1 | 96 | 1.04 | 53.2 | 5 |
| 2010 | ![]() | 25 | 0.67 | 1-0 | 41 | 1.00 | 27.0 | 4 |
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.