
#35 C · Reds
Height
5'9"
Weight
215 lbs
Age
33
College
Oral Roberts
Draft
2014, Rd 6, #186
Experience
8 yrs
Bats/Throws
R/R
Grade Jose Trevino
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Jose Trevino grades out as a middling C for Reds (C+ Performance). That places him 36th of 92 graded catchers. Against that production, his deal reads as good value on the Contract Value Index (B) — the team is paying below what the play would command. The public read is very positive (A- Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | AVG | HR | RBI | OPS | SB | H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | ![]() | 14 | .138 | 0 | 2 | .339 | 0 | 4 |
| 2025 |
Length
2 years
Total Value
$11.5M
Guaranteed
$6.9M
AAV
$5.8M/yr
Jose Trevino delivers the kind of production that earns a C+ performance grade against MLB catcher comps. The headline story here is damage control: a 33-year-old established veteran returning from a significant injury stint, thrust into depth duty for a Reds club sitting at 32-35 and clawing to stay competitive in the National League Central with 107 days remaining in the regular season. His 2026 season numbers—.138 AVG, 0 HR, 5 K across 14 games—paint a picture of a player still finding his footing post-rehab, with an offensive floor that frankly doesn't inspire confidence in meaningful contribution down the stretch. The one tangible asset Trevino carries into this role is his 2022 Gold Glove, evidence of above-average defensive craft behind the plate that can still anchor a backup catcher profile, though at 33 and coming off injury, durability remains a legitimate question mark. Media framing has settled firmly into stopgap territory—Cincinnati's front office has been visibly active elsewhere, signing pitching reinforcements and other position upgrades, which correctly positions Trevino as a low-priority depth piece rather than a solution to the team's larger competitive window. The disconnect between his actual defensive pedigree and the marginal on-field production creates a mismatch that explains why public perception has cooled despite his arrival: he's a solid backup option if healthy, but nothing in his recent performance or the Reds' roster construction suggests he's central to what comes next.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the B band — a quick read on where Jose's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Jose Trevino ranks 36th of 92 graded catchers by performance. That slots Jose between Tyler Heineman (C+) just ahead and Rafael Flores (C+) just behind.
Graded higher
Tyler HeinemanBlue JaysC+Gabriel MorenoDiamondbacksC+Eric HaaseGiantsC+Graded lower
Rafael FloresPiratesAuto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Jose Trevino is a veteran in his 8th MLB season listed at C for the Reds. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Jose Trevino, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index B, Performance C+, Sentiment A-.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
![]() |
| 94 |
| .238 |
| 4 |
| 22 |
| .623 |
| 0 |
| 67 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 74 | .215 | 8 | 28 | .642 | 1 | 45 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 55 | .210 | 4 | 15 | .569 | 0 | 33 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 115 | .248 | 11 | 43 | .671 | 2 | 83 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 89 | .239 | 5 | 30 | .607 | 1 | 68 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 24 | .250 | 2 | 9 | .714 | 0 | 19 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 40 | .258 | 2 | 13 | .655 | 0 | 31 |
| 2018 | ![]() | 3 | .250 | 0 | 3 | .500 | 0 | 2 |
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.