
#12 RF · Angels
Height
6'3"
Weight
235 lbs
Age
34
College
N/A
Experience
12 yrs
Bats/Throws
R/R
Grade Jorge Soler
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Jorge Soler grades out as a shaky RF for Angels (D Performance). That places him 71st of 74 graded right fielders. The contract is harder to defend: the Contract Value Index calls it a significant overpay (F), with the cost outrunning the output. The public read is sharply negative (F Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score. With 12+ seasons of track record, these grades rest on a deep sample.
| Year | Team | GP | AVG | HR | RBI | OPS | SB | H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 1152 | 0.23954183 | 212 | 583 | 0.78150535 | 12 | 962 |
| 2026 | ![]() | 58 | .220 | 9 | 33 | .702 | 0 | 47 |
| 2025 |
Length
3 years
Total Value
$42.0M
Guaranteed
$25.2M
AAV
$14.0M/yr
Production at right field earns Jorge Soler a D performance grade in the current MLB sample. At 34 and in his 13th season, Soler is operating well below the threshold expected from a World Series MVP and reliable middle-of-the-order contributor — his 2026 season numbers (.220 AVG, 9 HR, 76 K across 58 games) reflect a player struggling to generate consistent at-bat value in a lineup desperately starved for run production. The lone bright spot is his power output relative to his limited opportunities, but that's been overshadowed by a strikeout rate that's consuming far too much of his plate appearances and a batting average that borders on replacement-level. He's appeared in just over half the team's games, a volume that combines reduced availability with subpar efficiency — durability has been further complicated by recent hip irritation that forced early exits, signaling age-related durability concerns at a critical juncture when the Angels (29-44, currently in the AL West basement) can't afford bench production masquerading as lineup depth. The mediaFraming acknowledges his pedigree and power upside as a theoretical spark plug, but the on-field reality is that goodwill is rapidly converting into trade speculation; with the Angels aggressively adding pitching arms and complementary position players, the front office's implicit signal is that Soler's window to prove he can stabilize this offense is closing fast, and his value as a movable asset may soon outweigh his utility to Los Angeles.
Jorge Soler ranks 71st of 74 graded right fielders by performance. That slots Jorge between Nathan Lukes (D+) just ahead and Eli White (D) just behind.
Graded higher
Nathan LukesBlue JaysD+Nick CastellanosPadresD+Victor RoblesMarinersD+Graded lower
Eli WhiteBraves| Date | OPP | Result | AB | H | R | HR | RBI | BB | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu, 6/4 | vs COL | W 11-4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Wed, 6/3 | vs COL | L 2-8 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Jorge Soler is a veteran in his 12th MLB season listed at RF for the Angels. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Jorge Soler, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index F, Performance D, Sentiment F.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
![]() |
| 82 |
| .215 |
| 12 |
| 34 |
| .680 |
| 0 |
| 60 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 93 | .240 | 12 | 40 | .749 | 1 | 82 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 49 | .243 | 9 | 24 | .849 | 0 | 37 |
| 2024 | 142 | .241 | 21 | 64 | .780 | 1 | 119 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 137 | .250 | 36 | 75 | .853 | 1 | 126 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 72 | .207 | 13 | 34 | .695 | 0 | 56 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 94 | .192 | 13 | 37 | .658 | 0 | 59 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 55 | .269 | 14 | 33 | .882 | 0 | 56 |
| 2021 | 149 | .223 | 27 | 70 | .748 | 0 | 115 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 43 | .228 | 8 | 24 | .769 | 0 | 34 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 162 | .265 | 48 | 117 | .923 | 3 | 156 |
| 2018 | ![]() | 61 | .265 | 9 | 28 | .820 | 3 | 59 |
| 2017 | ![]() | 35 | .144 | 2 | 6 | .503 | 0 | 14 |
| 2016 | ![]() | 86 | .238 | 12 | 31 | .769 | 0 | 54 |
| 2015 | ![]() | 101 | .262 | 10 | 47 | .723 | 3 | 96 |
| 2014 | ![]() | 24 | .292 | 5 | 20 | .903 | 1 | 26 |
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.
| Tue, 6/2 | vs COL | L 8-9 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |