
#8 1B · Rays
Height
6'0"
Weight
215 lbs
Age
28
College
N/A
Experience
4 yrs
Bats/Throws
L/R
Grade Jonathan Aranda
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Jonathan Aranda grades out as a strong 1B for Rays (B+ Performance). That places him 12th of 57 graded first basemen. The public read is negative (D+ Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | AVG | HR | RBI | OPS | SB | H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 278 | 0.27344632 | 35 | 136 | 0.8089008 | 0 | 242 |
| 2026 | ![]() | 63 | .270 | 11 | 45 | .834 | 0 | 61 |
| 2025 |
Length
1 year
AAV
$780K/yr
Jonathan Aranda has established himself as one of the more compelling first base profiles in the American League, earning a B+ performance grade that has been trending upward over the last 30 days — a trajectory that aligns with the franchise-cornerstone narrative building around him in Tampa Bay. At 27 and in his fourth year, Aranda sits squarely in what should be his physical prime, and the combination of Opening Day power display and All-Star pedigree signals a player who is beginning to fulfill the promise that made him an organizational centerpiece. The performance grade reflects a player operating at a clear above-average level at his position, with his power production standing out as his defining calling card — the kind of authoritative contact that generates legitimate distance conversations and drives the MVP-caliber chatter that has surrounded him entering 2026. Where there is still room for growth is in reaching the truly elite tier that the surrounding narrative has already assigned him; there remains a measurable gap between his current production level and the superstar ceiling his supporters have projected, and closing that gap consistently over a full season is the next benchmark. His modest contract relative to his emerging star status is a significant organizational asset, giving the Rays — who have been actively adding pitching depth through recent roster moves — the kind of budget flexibility that contending teams covet. As a fourth-year player on a team sitting at 15-11 with legitimate playoff positioning in the AL East, Aranda carries the dual burden and opportunity of being the face of a franchise that needs its best position player to mature from above-average to elite in real time.
Jonathan Aranda ranks 12th of 57 graded first basemen by performance. That slots Jonathan between Matt Olson (A-) just ahead and Jared Young (B+) just behind.
Graded higher
Matt OlsonBravesA-Michael BuschCubsA-Nick SolakPadresA-Graded lower
Jared YoungMets| Date | OPP | Result | AB | H | R | HR | RBI | BB | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed, 6/17 | @ LAD | L 0-1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Tue, 6/16 | @ LAD | L 3-4 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Jonathan Aranda is a player in his 4th MLB season listed at 1B for the Rays. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Jonathan Aranda, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Performance B+, Sentiment D+.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
![]() |
| 106 |
| .316 |
| 14 |
| 59 |
| .882 |
| 0 |
| 117 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 44 | .234 | 6 | 14 | .738 | 0 | 30 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 34 | .230 | 2 | 13 | .708 | 0 | 20 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 32 | .192 | 2 | 6 | .597 | 0 | 15 |
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.
| Sun, 6/14 | @ LAA | W 8-3 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Wed, 6/10 | vs BOS | W 7-5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mon, 6/8 | vs BOS | W 3-1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Sun, 6/7 | @ MIA | L 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Sat, 6/6 | @ MIA | L 3-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Fri, 6/5 | @ MIA | W 6-0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| Wed, 6/3 | vs DET | L 2-7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |