
#59 SP · Athletics
Height
6'3"
Weight
218 lbs
Age
33
College
App State
Draft
2015, Rd 30, #888
Experience
8 yrs
Bats/Throws
L/L
Grade Jeffrey Springs
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Jeffrey Springs grades out as a middling SP for Athletics (C+ Performance). That places him 140th of 252 graded starting pitchers. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at C, fairly priced. The public read is negative (D+ Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | ERA | W-L | K | WHIP | IP | SV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 190 | 3.7319713 | 37-29 | 557 | 1.2349759 | 0.0 | 2 |
| 2026 | ![]() | 13 | 4.37 | 3-6 | 60 | 1.24 | 70.0 | 0 |
| 2025 |
Length
4 years
Total Value
$31.0M
Guaranteed
$18.6M
AAV
$7.8M/yr
Jeffrey Springs' on-field production earns a C+ performance grade against SP peers across MLB. The 33-year-old established veteran logged 13 games in the 2026 season with 3 wins and 60 strikeouts, marking a mid-rotation arm capable of flashing competence without sustaining elite consistency—his strikeout total represents his clearest statistical strength this season, showing he still possesses the stuff to miss bats when dialed in. However, the win-loss record and games-played volume reveal the fundamental inconsistency that defines his profile: enough starts to matter in Oakland's rotation, but not enough dominance to anchor it. At this stage of his career, Springs occupies that frustrating middle ground where he can deliver a near no-hitter one outing and stumble through a tough series the next, keeping the Athletics perpetually uncertain whether he's a stabilizing mid-rotation piece or a candidate for eventual replacement. The sentiment around him remains cautiously optimistic at B-, with media and fans appreciating his flashes of brilliance while acknowledging that durability and consistency remain legitimate concerns—with the regular season still 111 days from conclusion and Oakland currently positioned at No. 8 in the AL West, Springs' next stretch of starts will be critical to determining whether he proves himself a trustworthy rotation anchor or forces the front office to keep shopping for upgrades.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where Jeffrey's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Jeffrey Springs ranks 140th of 252 graded starting pitchers by performance. That slots Jeffrey between Cam Schlittler (C+) just ahead and Jameson Taillon (C+) just behind.
Graded higher
Cam SchlittlerYankeesC+LaZaro EstradaBlue JaysC+Hunter DobbinsCardinalsC+Graded lower
Jameson TaillonAuto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Jeffrey Springs is a veteran in his 8th MLB season listed at SP for the Athletics. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Jeffrey Springs, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C, Performance C+, Sentiment D+.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
![]() |
| 32 |
| 4.11 |
| 11-11 |
| 138 |
| 1.21 |
| 171.0 |
| 0 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 7 | 3.27 | 2-2 | 37 | 1.36 | 33.0 | 0 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 3 | 0.56 | 2-0 | 24 | 0.50 | 16.0 | 0 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 33 | 2.46 | 9-5 | 144 | 1.07 | 135.1 | 0 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 43 | 3.43 | 5-1 | 63 | 1.10 | 44.2 | 2 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 16 | 7.08 | 0-2 | 28 | 1.82 | 20.1 | 0 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 25 | 6.40 | 4-1 | 32 | 1.89 | 32.1 | 0 |
| 2018 | ![]() | 18 | 3.38 | 1-1 | 31 | 1.44 | 32.0 | 0 |
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.