
#67 RP · Rangers
Height
6'2"
Weight
185 lbs
Age
30
College
LSU
Experience
4 yrs
Bats/Throws
R/L
Grade Jacob LaTz
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Jacob LaTz grades out as an excellent RP for Rangers (A- Performance). That places him 65th of 389 graded relief pitchers. The public read is positive (B Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | ERA | W-L | K | WHIP | IP | SV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 106 | 2.8700788 | 5-5 | 154 | 1.1751969 | 0.0 | 10 |
| 2026 | ![]() | 23 | 1.86 | 1-1 | 29 | 0.62 | 29.0 | 9 |
| 2025 |
Length
1 year
AAV
$780K/yr
Tape review and advanced metrics converge on an A- performance grade for Jacob Latz. The 30-year-old right-hander has emerged as a genuine organizational asset for the Rangers, delivering the kind of impact reliever production that makes teams competitive down the stretch—and his 2026 season stats (1W, 29 K across 23 appearances) reflect efficient, high-leverage work in a pressure role. His strikeout rate stands as the clearest strength, demonstrating the kind of swing-and-miss stuff that justifies the mounting speculation about rotation consideration. The one limiting factor is win-loss accumulation, which is as much a function of bullpen deployment as anything else, but it's worth noting in the context of his role. What elevates Latz beyond a typical relief contributor is the narrative force behind his ascent—a no-hit start to the season that set a Texas Rangers franchise record has legitimately shifted front-office and media perception, moving him from depth piece to viable starter candidate at a moment when the Rangers are actively reshuffling their roster. At $0.8M, he represents exceptional salary-cap efficiency, giving the organization flexibility to build around him. At this stage of his career and with the window for a rotation opportunity currently open, Latz's performance validates the trajectory the beat writers and team insiders have been tracking.
Jacob LaTz ranks 65th of 389 graded relief pitchers by performance. That slots Jacob between Andrew Wantz (A-) just ahead and Nick Davila (A-) just behind.
Graded higher
Andrew WantzRaysA-Griffin JaxRaysA-Andrew KittredgeOriolesA-Graded lower
Nick DavilaMariners| Date | OPP | Result | AB | H | R | HR | RBI | BB | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun, 6/14 | @ BOS | W 6-4 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |
| Thu, 6/11 | @ KC | W 4-2 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Jacob LaTz is a player in his 4th MLB season listed at RP for the Rangers. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Jacob LaTz, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Performance A-, Sentiment B.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
![]() |
| 33 |
| 2.84 |
| 2-0 |
| 76 |
| 1.24 |
| 85.2 |
| 1 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 46 | 3.71 | 2-3 | 40 | 1.51 | 43.2 | 0 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 3 | 0.00 | 0-0 | 5 | 0.63 | 6.1 | 0 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 1 | 5.79 | 0-1 | 4 | 1.07 | 4.2 | 0 |
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.
| Sat, 6/6 | vs CLE | W 3-2 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |
| Mon, 6/1 | @ STL | W 2-1 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |