Height
6'2"
Weight
185 lbs
Age
30
College
LSU
Experience
4 yrs
Bats/Throws
R/L
Fan Verdict
Grade this player:
Career StatsA-
| Year | Team | GP | ERA | W-L | K | WHIP | IP | SV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 85 | 2.972477 | 4-4 | 128 | 1.2522936 | 0.0 | 1 |
Current Contract
Length
1 year
AAV
$780K/yr
Contract Value Index (CVI)
The Rangers struck gold with Jacob Latz's $780K deal, earning an A+ CVI that represents exceptional value for a reliable bullpen arm. At 30 years old in his fourth MLB season, Latz has emerged as a solid contributor with a B+ performance grade, delivering exactly what Texas needs from a middle-relief option. His recent four scoreless innings and no-hit outings demonstrate the consistency that makes minimum-salary relievers so valuable when they can actually get outs at the big league level. The media coverage has been overwhelmingly positive, with headlines emphasizing his importance to the Rangers' pitching staff and his reliable role in key situations. For a team making roster moves throughout their farm system, locking up proven bullpen depth at league minimum represents smart resource allocation. The one-year term carries zero risk while providing the Rangers with a dependable arm who has clearly found his footing as a major league reliever.
Performance Analysis
Jacob Latz grades as an All-Star caliber performer among MLB relief pitchers, earning a B+ Performance grade. He carries a 3.08 ERA (below the league average of 4.20, a strong mark) and a 1.29 WHIP across 140.1 innings pitched with a 8.0 K/9 rate. His 4-4 record with 1 saves provides context on team support and run prevention. As a prime-age veteran at 29, Jacob is a key contributor for the Rangers.
Recent Games
| Date | OPP | Result | AB | H | R | HR | RBI | BB | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat, 4/11 | @ LAD | L 7-8 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |
| Wed, 4/8 | vs SEA | W 3-2 | - | - | - | 0 | - | - | - |
News & Buzz
Live Discussion
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Discussion
Loading discussion...

